Re: Why doesn't ... -- time lag exist

2011-05-19 Thread Charles Kroeger
The political aspects of the non-free debate are regrettable like Bolshevik committees discussing some point of thought everyone has to accept. The current Debian policy of choice seems best. If I'm not shaken down for money on a regular basis like Windows users, that's fine with me. It might

Re: Why doesn't ... -- time lag exist

2011-05-03 Thread Jon Dowland
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 04:47:01PM +0100, Lisi wrote: > And "What is this crap" was helpful in what way?? And he should be grateful > for such a response because... ? Indeed. sdc's original post could be considered to be a carefully-constructed flame, but his subsequent reply clearly shows this

Re: Why doesn't ... -- time lag exist

2011-05-03 Thread Lisi
On Tuesday 03 May 2011 16:20:29 Osamu Aoki wrote: > Please be kind to the people spending time to respond to you and > thankful to them.  Please also understand there are some time lag on > mailing list communication. > > At least to me, you (=sdc) are the one started with sensational words in > ti

Re: Why doesn't ... -- time lag exist

2011-05-03 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:10:08AM +0300, sdc wrote: > Michelle Konzack, don't know why you are replying since the problem has been > solved. Read the thread, if you are looking for flame, flame elsewhere. By > the way, is there an option to mark this mail as a solved so others will > (hopeful