On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:10:30 +, T o n g wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:36:57 +, Camaleón wrote:
Camaleón, I read all your posts, and agree to them all. But I have to
say I don't agree with you on this one.
No problem. I value most a good argumentation (being positive or
negative)
Hal Vaughan wrote:
I retired at 45, thanks to my business, which was based on my own custom
software. The first program I released to run on my clients' computers
was in Java, within 6 months after I learned Java and OOP. In the next 18
months that version was in use, I had fewer than 5 bug
On Tue January 18 2011 05:06:52 Camaleón wrote:
Finally, he decided to give it another role → gnome-core as metapackage
for a GNOME DE that fits into a CD.
Good or bad decision? Dunno, it's just a decision and as such can be
enhanced, revoked, confirmed... as anything in this life :-)
Dear
I took a moment this morning to compare the differences between the
two packages mentioned thus far in this thread, gnome-core and
gnome-session.
gnome-core contains 524 packages
gnome-session contains 368 packages
There is a 367MB difference between the installed sizes of gnome-core
and
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 06:36:57PM +, Camaleón wrote:
Yes, I care about it. I usually run Debian for headless systems that
don't use X or a DE, but when I'm using a GUI on Debian, and need to use
a Gnome program, there's much more sense to it requiring and installing
the bare minimum
Chris Bannister wrote:
Hmmm, I've got postgreSQL running on this machine. I have never
installed mysql, and in fact don't want it, and yet:
...
libaprutil1 depends on libmysqlclient15off ( 5.0.51a).
This has been fixed for Squeeze circa May 2009.
See:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:53:34PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Chris Bannister wrote:
Hmmm, I've got postgreSQL running on this machine. I have never
installed mysql, and in fact don't want it, and yet:
...
libaprutil1 depends on libmysqlclient15off ( 5.0.51a).
This has been fixed for
On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 13:08:36 -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
I'm running Debian Squeeze, and I have only gnome-core installed so
that I would not have Evolution or Epiphany installed since I do not
use them.
Me too.
Basically because gnome-desktop-environment is too big to fit on CD 1.
See bug
On Jan 17, 2011, at 12:16 PM, T o n g wrote:
On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 13:08:36 -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
I'm running Debian Squeeze, and I have only gnome-core installed so
that I would not have Evolution or Epiphany installed since I do not
use them.
Me too.
Basically because
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:26:17PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
This is an example of why I've been moving away from FOSS. Someone makes
a good point in a bug report and the programmer/developer/maintainer
throws it back in his face, which allows the bug to be closed out quickly.
I think
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:26:17 -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
(I'm going to play here the role of the devil's advocate... oh, well)
This is an example of why I've been moving away from FOSS. Someone
makes a good point in a bug report and the
programmer/developer/maintainer throws it back in his
On Jan 17, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Carl Fink wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:26:17PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
This is an example of why I've been moving away from FOSS. Someone makes
a good point in a bug report and the programmer/developer/maintainer
throws it back in his face, which
On Mon January 17 2011 09:26:17 Hal Vaughan wrote:
This is an example of why I've been moving away from FOSS. Someone makes a
good point in a bug report and the programmer/developer/maintainer throws
it back in his face, which allows the bug to be closed out quickly.
Ill-considered decisions
On Mon January 17 2011 10:36:57 Camaleón wrote:
* gnome-core = GNOME installation designed to fit on one CD
That is a CHANGE to the definition of gnome-core, which affects
many users who have gnome-core installed but not gnome-desktop-
-environment.
Here is the Lenny definition of the
T o n g wrote:
That seems to me an absurd reason.
Here is the actual reason, from http://bugs.debian.org/608098#31
| in squeeze, the gnome-session package now
| depends on the basic components that are actually needed for running a
| GNOME session. Since this change was made, I hadn’t known
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:36:57 +, Camaleón wrote:
(note that everybody can reopen a bug)
Camaleón, I read all your posts, and agree to them all. But I have to say
I don't agree with you on this one.
For *this specific case*, I *do* consider the DD's reply being
pointlessly abrasive,
On Sat January 1 2011 03:50:54 Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-01-01 12:26 +0100, Daniel Andersson wrote:
I'm running Debian Squeeze, and I have only gnome-core installed so
that I would not have Evolution or Epiphany installed since I do not
use them.
But it seems that both Evolution and
Hi
I'm running Debian Squeeze, and I have only gnome-core installed so that
I would not have Evolution or Epiphany installed since I do not use them.
But it seems that both Evolution and Epiphany has been moved from
gnome-desktop-environment to gnome-core. They were not a part of
gnome-core
On 2011-01-01 12:26 +0100, Daniel Andersson wrote:
I'm running Debian Squeeze, and I have only gnome-core installed so
that I would not have Evolution or Epiphany installed since I do not
use them.
But it seems that both Evolution and Epiphany has been moved from
gnome-desktop-environment
19 matches
Mail list logo
