Another opinion, worth what you're paying for it:
I actually switched from E to sawmill and then back to E. Why? Part of
it was the eye candy, I really like the real-time ripples on the bottom
of the screen using just 2% of cpu (Celeron 333), translucent drag is
dead cool, tooltips are classic,
E.L. Meijer Eric" hat gesagt: // E.L. Meijer Eric" wrote:
> Does the current incarnation of E already have a desktop pager with the
> same functionality as fvwm2? Some time ago it didn't, and for me it is
> one of the features I like most (and use heavily) about fvwm2.
Yup, that was one of the r
I'll second (or third) the "I like E, but now I'm using sawmill"
senitment. I had no clear reason for moving from E to sawmill other
than the fact that sawmill seemed a little more minimalist which is what
I like in a window manager. If you like to hack your window manager and
you're addicted to
"E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does the current incarnation of E already have a desktop pager with the
> same functionality as fvwm2? Some time ago it didn't, and for me it is
> one of the features I like most (and use heavily) about fvwm2.
I can't give a real answer, since
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 11:33:29AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
[...]
> Enlightenment seems to be as fast as any other window manager on my
> P133/80Meg machine, and E is a quite a bit more attractive than any
> other WM I've seen (I should perhaps phrase this as `most of the other
> WMs I've seen are
i agree ..it looks great..if your willing to sacrafice the speed..for some
its worth it ..its always nice to have the choice. i for use chose
afterstep, and it flies. kde is a DOG compared to it..i havent tried E for
a couple years back then it was pretty slow ..but was useable..never
figured out
"David J. Kanter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am I the only one who finds Enlightenment bloated, too busy and too hard to
> read? I'm willing to listen to those who use it; but after trying it out
> last night, I'm not too willing to switch from my speedy and trusty fvwm2 or
> window maker.
It's
OK, I'll bite.
I mean, didn't the Trolls spout this back during E 0.14? Admittedly, I gave up
on E recently for Sawmill, but E was always a good window manager. If it
wasn't, why would it be as popular as it is? You said it yourself, you don't
have to use it. Then don't.
There's nothing fo
On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 07:21:28AM -0600, David J. Kanter wrote:
> Am I the only one who finds Enlightenment bloated, too busy and too hard to
> read? I'm willing to listen to those who use it; but after trying it out
> last night, I'm not too willing to switch from my speedy and trusty fvwm2 or
>
Am I the only one who finds Enlightenment bloated, too busy and too hard to
read? I'm willing to listen to those who use it; but after trying it out
last night, I'm not too willing to switch from my speedy and trusty fvwm2 or
window maker.
--
David J. Kanter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Humans have an inna
10 matches
Mail list logo
