Re: X is painful + GPLed solution

1996-11-19 Thread Martin Konold
On Fri, 15 Nov 1996, Bill Bumgarner wrote: > > # Have look at the kde project. > > The problem with kde is that they use qt, which has a very > restrictive license that makes it non-free software (in > particular, they do not allow any modified version of the > library to be distributed). Rememb

Re: X is painful + GPLed solution

1996-11-18 Thread Bill Bumgarner
rbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Core X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; Linux 2.1.9 i586) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: X is painful + GPLed solution Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Bill Bumgarner wrote: > > # Have look at the kde

Re: X is painful + GPLed solution

1996-11-18 Thread Herbert Xu
Bill Bumgarner wrote: > > # Have look at the kde project. > > I will-- and if it is as cool as you make it sound, I'll happily put > together the debian packaging information... The problem with kde is that they use qt, which has a very restrictive license that makes it non-free software (in par

Re: X is painful + GPLed solution

1996-11-15 Thread Bill Bumgarner
Actually-- I thought it was appropriate for the devel list since it may affect future development of debian at the user interface level. Regardless, my followup is to debian-user only. > There is no inter-application communication or awareness to speak of. # This can be handelt via sockets,