Or, you could check this out:
http://arachne.cz/
(Arachne WWW browser for DOS+Linux / Webhosting / MP3streaming)
Cheers,
Jason.
>
> besides gzilla (www.gzilla.com ?), there is also
> mnemonic (www.mnemonic.org). It requires multi-threading, so you need
> to have glibc 2.1.x (potato)
>
> try
kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 06:46:07PM +0200, Atila Nemet wrote:
> > AN> Unfortunately I have only an old 486 PC on 120MHz. Is there
> > AN> window manager which is low on system resources so I
> > AN> could set up X on this 486?
> >
> > From, the help I've got, it seem
> On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 11:03, Sven Burgener wrote:
> >
> > Apropos 486 and firewall: what requirements are there for a firewall /
> > masq. gateway to serve a LAN of approx. 20 - 50 clients?
> > I mean, I have seen a 486 25sx w/z a cable modem serve up to 5 clients
> > completely fine. It has I
On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 11:03, Sven Burgener wrote:
>
> Apropos 486 and firewall: what requirements are there for a firewall /
> masq. gateway to serve a LAN of approx. 20 - 50 clients?
> I mean, I have seen a 486 25sx w/z a cable modem serve up to 5 clients
> completely fine. It has IIRC 48 mbs o
>Don't throw your 486 away when you eventually get a faster machine.
One day
>it will make a fine firewall.
Apropos 486 and firewall: what requirements are there for a firewall /
masq. gateway to serve a LAN of approx. 20 - 50 clients?
I mean, I have seen a 486 25sx w/z a cable modem serve up to 5
Without knowing how much memory your machine has, I would say you certainly
need more than the standard amount supplied in a 486. Mine had 64 Mb in it,
but had 32 at one stage which was okay. More is definitely better when it
come to memory.
Don't throw your 486 away when you eventually get
Try IceWM or WindowMaker. I used to use Windowmaker on a 486/75.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Ich fuhle, Luft von anderen Planeten"
Note: No Microsoft programs were used in the
creation or distribution of this message.
If you are using a Microsoft program to view this messa
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 06:46:07PM +0200, Atila Nemet wrote:
> AN> Unfortunately I have only an old 486 PC on 120MHz. Is there
> AN> window manager which is low on system resources so I
> AN> could set up X on this 486?
>
> From, the help I've got, it seems that the problem is not with the
> windo
Atila,
I believe you are correct re: Netscape being the time/mem culprit. I
have a 486DX66 w/24Mb RAM Debian test box and use fvwm2 (a.k.a. fvwm
now) quite nicely. I installed Netscape6 and, yes, it worked but like
molasses in January.
I opted for removing Netscape completely and using a very nic
> Is there window manager which is low on system resources so I could set up X
> on this 486?
Allô,
It is a shame that olvwm has not evolved to be more competitive on the wm's
list. I have set up a 486DX2-66, with 16MB RAM and low mem Trident
VLB video card, on top of which I run olvwm. Works
Atila Nemet wrote:
>
> AN> Unfortunately I have only an old 486 PC on 120MHz. Is there
> AN> window manager which is low on system resources so I
> AN> could set up X on this 486?
>
> From, the help I've got, it seems that the problem is not with the
> window manager itself (since there are peopl
AN> Unfortunately I have only an old 486 PC on 120MHz. Is there
AN> window manager which is low on system resources so I
AN> could set up X on this 486?
From, the help I've got, it seems that the problem is not with the
window manager itself (since there are people who are using X with various
win
Atila Nemet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> Unfortunately I have only an old 486 PC on 120MHz. Is there
> window manager which is low on system resources so I
> could set up X on this 486?
other than those already mentioned, there is icewm.
its advantage is IMHO that it is fast but still i
At 18.07 29/5/00 +0800, Corey Popelier ha escrit:
>Windowmaker runs fine on my 486DX2-66 with 12Mb RAM. :)
WindowMaker runs quite decently with the same machine as you, Corey, but w/
20 MB of short (in cm) RAM slots and w/ an ISA video card.
Atila, try to find somewhere in the /usr/X11, usr/doc
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 05:24:50 Atila Nemet wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Unfortunately I have only an old 486 PC on 120MHz. Is there
> window manager which is low on system resources so I
> could set up X on this 486?
I used to run KDE on a 486 Dx4/100 with 12 meg of ram ! But that was a bit
extreme, there ar
Windowmaker runs fine on my 486DX2-66 with 12Mb RAM. :)
Cheers,
Corey Popelier
http://members.dingoblue.net.au/~pancreas
Work Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Atila Nemet wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Unfortunately I have only an old 486 PC on 120MHz. Is there
> window manager which is low o
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 07:24:50PM +0200, Atila Nemet wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Unfortunately I have only an old 486 PC on 120MHz. Is there
> window manager which is low on system resources so I
> could set up X on this 486?
In addition to the others mentioned: flwm is very light-weight, but not
too confi
Atila Nemet wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Unfortunately I have only an old 486 PC on 120MHz. Is there
> window manager which is low on system resources so I
> could set up X on this 486?
>
> Attila
I've tried most of them and on my machine the ones that use the least are
fvwm95,
blackbox and olvwm. I find fv
Atila Nemet wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Unfortunately I have only an old 486 PC on 120MHz. Is there
> window manager which is low on system resources so I
> could set up X on this 486?
I'd suggest blackbox. Of the ones I've tried - which include Window
Maker, blackbox, Enlightenment, Sawmill (and its desce
Hi!
Unfortunately I have only an old 486 PC on 120MHz. Is there
window manager which is low on system resources so I
could set up X on this 486?
Attila
20 matches
Mail list logo
