Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)

2011-03-28 Thread Doug
On 03/27/2011 11:25 PM, Marc Shapiro wrote: On 03/27/11 19:52, Scott Ferguson wrote: And Double-U Double-U - I know that is how it's supposed to be, but I've spent years (delighting in) saying wuh wuh wuh (as in the Magyar w). How about combining all three of them into 'hexa-u? Marc

Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)

2011-03-28 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On 2011-03-27 21:52:29 Scott Ferguson wrote: And Double-U Double-U - I know that is how it's supposed to be, but I've spent years (delighting in) saying wuh wuh wuh (as in the Magyar w). World Wide Web = 3 syllables. www = double-u double-u double-u = 9 syllables. Abbreviation FAIL! -- Boyd

Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)

2011-03-28 Thread Glenn English
On Mar 28, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: World Wide Web = 3 syllables. www = double-u double-u double-u = 9 syllables. 3dub works -- 2 syllables, and less work required from the mouth :-) -- Glenn English g...@slsware.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)

2011-03-28 Thread Tony van der Hoff
On 28/03/11 16:11, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: On 2011-03-27 21:52:29 Scott Ferguson wrote: And Double-U Double-U - I know that is how it's supposed to be, but I've spent years (delighting in) saying wuh wuh wuh (as in the Magyar w). World Wide Web = 3 syllables. www = double-u double-u

You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)

2011-03-27 Thread Ron Johnson
On 03/27/2011 08:35 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote: An apt-get update for Squeeze gives the following error message:- dpkg: syntax error in file triggers file `/var/lib/dpkg/triggers//File' E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2) The machine is a fairly standard KDE Squeeze i386 -

Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)

2011-03-27 Thread Nate Bargmann
* On 2011 27 Mar 21:13 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: That's a double *slash*. The backslash (on my US small Enter kb) is under the pipe. We know this because typewriter keyboards only had one such key and so Lower Left To Upper Right became the slash key. When IBM added another key, that

Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)(is now OOT)

2011-03-27 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 28/03/11 13:12, Ron Johnson wrote: You touched one of my pet peeves Thanks - I assure you it was unintentional, I have now washed my hands and disinfected the keyboard. :-) On 03/27/2011 08:35 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote: snipped Is the double backslashes a clue? That's a double

Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)

2011-03-27 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 28/03/11 13:26, Nate Bargmann wrote: * On 2011 27 Mar 21:13 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: That's a double *slash*. The backslash (on my US small Enter kb) is under the pipe. We know this because typewriter keyboards only had one such key and so Lower Left To Upper Right became the slash

Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)

2011-03-27 Thread Marc Shapiro
On 03/27/11 19:52, Scott Ferguson wrote: And Double-U Double-U - I know that is how it's supposed to be, but I've spent years (delighting in) saying wuh wuh wuh (as in the Magyar w). How about combining all three of them into 'hexa-u? Marc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to