Hans wrote:
> Yes, and this behavior appears also from the beginning on. It is annoying.
> I had the hope, that it will be fixed some day. But it is not, even after
> years. I do not want to blame someone, as I respect the time and efforts,
> the developers give for the community. But when it is n
Hi Mark,
> Hans,
>
> I'm running KMail version 5.5.2. From what you report, it sounds to me like
> you are running an older version. The version I run allows me to select
No, I don't. Mine is version 5.7.3 (debian/testing). But that is not the
point. The point is, that akonadi is slow from the
On Thursday, June 7, 2018 3:18:01 PM EDT Hans wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> just a little feedback. IMO akonadi in kmail should be either really
> improved or dropped.
>
> I do not want to mourne, as I know, there is lots of work done in free time,
> but akonadi at the moment (better since the change to
On Thu, 07 Jun 2018 21:18:01 +0200
Hans wrote:
Hello Hans,
>just a little feedback. IMO akonadi in kmail should be either really
>improved or dropped.
That's a kmail/akonadi issue, not specifically a Debian one. The
relevant Debian packaging team(s) are probably not involved directly in
develo
Hans wrote:
> Don't know if anyone got into the same trouble, but IMO akonadi should be
> improved.
yes long time ago. I think it was 2008. Since then I use TDE which is old
KDE3. I am not advertising, but KDE >= 4 is PITA in itself.
regards
Hi folks,
just a little feedback. IMO akonadi in kmail should be either really improved
or dropped.
I do not want to mourne, as I know, there is lots of work done in free time,
but akonadi at the moment (better since the change to akonadi in kmail) is
pita.
Akonadi is slow, really slow. If y
6 matches
Mail list logo
