On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:25:03PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
I see it just fine, but then I am sighted. I don't know how blind
Debians access the list, but they do. I suppose they have something
that does text to voice, or text to braille. Whatever it is, I doubt
that it can handle figlet to
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:04:14PM -0400, ScruLoose wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:13:11PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 05:32:57PM -0700, Steve C. Lamb wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:17:42PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Why would anybody read an inheirently
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 8:13 pm, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:25:03PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
I see it just fine, but then I am sighted. I don't know how blind
Debians access the list, but they do. I suppose they have something
that does text to voice, or text to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:13:08AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I know of a couple of Debian developers who are blind, or close to it.
I've met one of them. Those that I know of all make tremendously useful
contributions, more than many sighted
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 12:44:25PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:13:08AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I know of a couple of Debian developers who are blind, or close to it.
I've met one of them. Those that I know of all make tremendously useful
contributions, more than
-Original Message-
From: Paul Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 11:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: anti-spam idea for this list
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 03:17:48AM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
I will give up my keyboard and text mode interface
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:08:41PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
How about using ASCII art instead (a la figlet or somesuch)?
See also: Warlording.
http://ursine.ca/jargon/html/W/warlording.html
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:08:41PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
How about using ASCII art instead (a la figlet or somesuch)?
it's machine parsable, defeats the purpose
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 12:08, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
How about using ASCII art instead (a la figlet or somesuch)?
$ figlet -w 72 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Makes perfect sense to a human eye, but should foil spam harvester
bots.
try it without a monospace font.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:08:41PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Paul Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 11:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: anti-spam idea for this list
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 03:17
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:50:16PM -0500, Ray wrote:
try it without a monospace font.
Why would anybody read an inheirently monospace medium in anything but
a monospaced font?
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :
`. `'`
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:17:42 -0700
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try it without a monospace font.
Why would anybody read an inheirently monospace medium in anything but
a monospaced font?
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian admin
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:17:42PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Why would anybody read an inheirently monospace medium in anything but
a monospaced font?
The web is a monospaced medium? Since when?
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 05:32:57PM -0700, Steve C. Lamb wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:17:42PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Why would anybody read an inheirently monospace medium in anything but
a monospaced font?
The web is a monospaced
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:13:11PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 05:32:57PM -0700, Steve C. Lamb wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:17:42PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Why would anybody read an inheirently monospace medium in anything but
a monospaced font?
Would it be too difficult to use fuzzy images of the mail addresses instead of
the text of the addresses itself to prevent programs from massively
collecting address from the web archives of this list?
I think that this method works because yahoo mail use it to prevent programs
from creating
Alfredo writes:
Would it be too difficult to use fuzzy images of the mail addresses
instead of the text of the addresses itself to prevent programs from
massively collecting address from the web archives of this list?
I think that this method works because yahoo mail use it to prevent
On Monday 20 October 2003 12:23 pm, John Hasler wrote:
Would it be too difficult to use fuzzy images of the mail addresses
instead of the text of the addresses itself to prevent programs from
massively collecting address from the web archives of this list?
I think that this method works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:01:12PM -0400, Alfredo Valles wrote:
At least yahoo care about making life easier to their users.
Your idea of easier does not reflect that of the open source
community, apparently.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:01:12PM -0400, Alfredo Valles wrote:
On Monday 20 October 2003 12:23 pm, John Hasler wrote:
Would it be too difficult to use fuzzy images of the mail addresses
instead of the text of the addresses itself to prevent programs from
massively collecting address
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Tom wrote:
For the blind, link to a CGI which generates the email as a WAV.
And the blind and deaf? ...
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:41:38PM -0400, Mike Dresser wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Tom wrote:
For the blind, link to a CGI which generates the email as a WAV.
And the blind and deaf? ...
Mike
I'm stumped; they would *have* to have machine-encodable information.
I can think of only
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:16 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Your idea of easier does not reflect that of the open source
community, apparently.
What does open source have to do with storing email addresses in
archives in a format that is easily harvested by spam-bots?
Does open source == no privacy?
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:50:52AM -0400, Alfredo Valles wrote:
Would it be too difficult to use fuzzy images of the mail addresses instead of
the text of the addresses itself to prevent programs from massively
collecting address from the web archives of this list?
I will give up my keyboard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 03:17:48AM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
I will give up my keyboard and text mode interface when they pry it
from my cold dead fingers...
I'm with you, there.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :
`. `'`
25 matches
Mail list logo
