Re: [WARNING] libc6 upgrade from 2.17.97 to 2.18.1 (unstable) fails -now segfaults on apt-get etc.

2014-02-24 Thread Darac Marjal
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 01:52:27AM +, Robin wrote: > **This of course may apply only to my PC but just in case it is not**: > > Just done dist-upgrade 01:30 22/02/2014 and upgrade fails whilst > updating libc6. Applications that were open are still functioning but > everything else segfaults.

Re: [WARNING] libc6 upgrade from 2.17.97 to 2.18.1 (unstable) fails -now segfaults on apt-get etc.

2014-02-24 Thread Robin
On 22 February 2014 01:52, Robin wrote: > **This of course may apply only to my PC but just in case it is not**: > > Just done dist-upgrade 01:30 22/02/2014 and upgrade fails whilst > updating libc6. Applications that were open are still functioning but > everything else segfaults. > Looks like a

Re: [WARNING] libc6 upgrade from 2.17.97 to 2.18.1 (unstable) fails -now segfaults on apt-get etc.

2014-02-22 Thread Robin
On 22 February 2014 07:59, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Sb, 22 feb 14, 01:52:27, Robin wrote: >> **This of course may apply only to my PC but just in case it is not**: >> >> Just done dist-upgrade 01:30 22/02/2014 and upgrade fails whilst >> updating libc6. Applications that were open are still func

Re: [WARNING] libc6 upgrade from 2.17.97 to 2.18.1 (unstable) fails -now segfaults on apt-get etc.

2014-02-21 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Sb, 22 feb 14, 01:52:27, Robin wrote: > **This of course may apply only to my PC but just in case it is not**: > > Just done dist-upgrade 01:30 22/02/2014 and upgrade fails whilst > updating libc6. Applications that were open are still functioning but > everything else segfaults. > Looks like a

[WARNING] libc6 upgrade from 2.17.97 to 2.18.1 (unstable) fails -now segfaults on apt-get etc.

2014-02-21 Thread Robin
**This of course may apply only to my PC but just in case it is not**: Just done dist-upgrade 01:30 22/02/2014 and upgrade fails whilst updating libc6. Applications that were open are still functioning but everything else segfaults. Looks like a reinstall -- rob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de

Re: dpkg/apt-get/etc. option to verify installed files again checksums?

2008-09-02 Thread Barclay, Daniel
I wrote: > (I have been having trouble with file corruption when copying files. It > seems > be on the write side rather than the read side, but now a file I've only > been > reading (/usr/bin/tail) seems be corrupt.) Never mind. It seems to be a memory failure. (Before rebooting, running ta

Re: dpkg/apt-get/etc. option to verify installed files again checksums?

2008-09-02 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Barclay, Daniel wrote: > What is the command or command option in dpkg/apt-get/etc. to verify the > current checksums of installed files again the checksums in the corresponding > package (.deb) file? > > (I have been having trouble with file corruption when copying files. It se

dpkg/apt-get/etc. option to verify installed files again checksums?

2008-09-02 Thread Barclay, Daniel
What is the command or command option in dpkg/apt-get/etc. to verify the current checksums of installed files again the checksums in the corresponding package (.deb) file? (I have been having trouble with file corruption when copying files. It seems be on the write side rather than the read side

apt-get & /etc/apt/preferences oddities

2002-03-16 Thread Julian Mehnle
Hi all! On a system, I'm running Debian Linux Testing (AKA Woody). I also have some IPv6-enabled packages installed via some additional lines in my /etc/apt/sources.list, which is: | # Main Debian Sources: | deb http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib | deb http://ft

Re: apt-get etc

2001-04-26 Thread Mike
Keith O'Connell wrote: > Hi, > > I am using stable. and periodically use the "apt-get update;apt-get > dist-upgrade" option to stay current. I have noticed that the programs > terminate normally and all appears to be in order except that I get > told that; > > The following packages have bee

Re: apt-get etc

2001-04-26 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 10:20:59AM +0100, Keith O'Connell wrote: > The following packages have been kept back > communicator navigator netscape > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not > upgraded > > My Netscape instalation went from 4.76 to 4.77 at the recent ch

apt-get etc

2001-04-26 Thread Keith O'Connell
Hi, I am using stable. and periodically use the "apt-get update;apt-get dist-upgrade" option to stay current. I have noticed that the programs terminate normally and all appears to be in order except that I get told that; The following packages have been kept back communicator navigator