Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
astrid jurgensen wrote:
I recently tried to download and install software using apt-get
install. The process was aborted because apt-get install tried to
remove the kernel. See details below:
apt-get install –no-remove xcdroast
13 upgraded, 13 newly installed, 2
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 10:48:12PM -0500, Mark Fletcher wrote:
...
> That would be my guess too. Looks to me like xcdroast needs a newer
> kernel than you have. I am somewhat surprised that the package would be
> set up to conflict with the older kernel version, and even more
> surprised that ap
astrid jurgensen wrote:
I recently tried to download and install software using apt-get install. The
process was aborted because apt-get install tried to remove the kernel. See
details below:
apt-get install –no-remove xcdroast
13 upgraded, 13 newly installed, 2 to remove and 500 not upgraded
On 2005-12-13, Mark Fletcher penned:
>
> How sure are we that this problem is related to xcdroast? Try
> installing something else, something harmless like an X-based game
> or something, to see if it tries to do the same thing. apt-get may
> just have got into a mess on your machine. I'm surprised
Michael Marsh wrote:
On 12/12/05, Joris Hooijberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2005/12/12, Michael Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Really? Nothing in what Astrid posted seemed to indicate that to me.
The only "kernel-image" that appears is the one that's presumably
going to be removed.
On 12/12/05, Joris Hooijberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2005/12/12, Michael Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Really? Nothing in what Astrid posted seemed to indicate that to me.
> > The only "kernel-image" that appears is the one that's presumably
> > going to be removed.
> >
> True. but I'm sure
besides, I don't know if you copy-pasted the command you posted here, but the command
apt-get install –no-remove xcdroast
gives me a "E: Command line option 'n' [from -no-remove] is not known." because the right command should be
apt-get install --no-remove xcdroast (with double minus-sign)
True. but I'm sure that
A. Apt-get's dependency-checking is designed to check upward
dependencies as well (i.e. when I remove Gimp , X.org will not be
removed, although Gimp depends on X.org).
B. there's no program at all that even can think of removing a kernel without replacing it or something
On 12/12/05, Joris Hooijberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you'll get a new kernel in return
Really? Nothing in what Astrid posted seemed to indicate that to me.
The only "kernel-image" that appears is the one that's presumably
going to be removed.
--
Michael A. Marsh
http://www.umiacs.u
I think you'll get a new kernel in return2005/12/12, astrid jurgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I recently tried to download and install software using apt-get install. The process was aborted because apt-get install tried to remove the kernel. See details below:apt-get install –no-remove xcdroast
Readi
I recently tried to download and install software using apt-get install. The
process was aborted because apt-get install tried to remove the kernel. See
details below:
apt-get install no-remove xcdroast
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following extra packages will be
11 matches
Mail list logo