Lista,
estoy intentando un apt-get update y obtengo este error:
W: GPG error http://http.us.debian.org stable Release: Error desconocido
ejecutando gpgv
alguna idea?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 08 July 2007 22:26, Alvaro wrote:
gpgv
Tenía la fecha mal, ahora funciona bien.
Witam
Jak uruchomie apt-get update wszystko jest ok jak zrobie to samo ale
przy uzyciu aptitue update dostaje wynik jak ponizej
W: Nie udało się wykonać operacji stat na liście pakietów źródłowych
http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists
Hi, when using 'apt-get update' I keep getting
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://www.mclean.net.nz stable Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
available: NO_PUBKEY 1AF1A20A4CC00851
W: GPG error: http://www.debian-multimedia.org
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:13:50AM +1200, alan bonard wrote:
Hi, when using 'apt-get update' I keep getting
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://www.mclean.net.nz stable Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
available: NO_PUBKEY
Le mercredi 23 mai 2007 à 06:34 +0200, Michel Grentzinger a écrit :
Bonjour,
Bonjour,
Avec Synaptic depuis quelques temps, je n'ai plus besoin de cliquer
sur Recharger pour actualiser la base des paquets.
C'est comme si un apt-get update était exécuté de manière automatique avant
même
Michel Grentzinger wrote:
Bonjour,
Avec Synaptic depuis quelques temps, je n'ai plus besoin de cliquer
sur Recharger pour actualiser la base des paquets.
C'est comme si un apt-get update était exécuté de manière automatique avant
même le lancement du logiciel.
D'où vient ce comportement
Le mercredi 23 mai 2007 09:06, Christophe Alonso a écrit :
Avec Synaptic depuis quelques temps, je n'ai plus besoin de cliquer
sur Recharger pour actualiser la base des paquets.
C'est comme si un apt-get update était exécuté de manière automatique
avant même le lancement du logiciel
Le mercredi 23 mai 2007 12:42, Daniel Caillibaud a écrit :
Avec Synaptic depuis quelques temps, je n'ai plus besoin de cliquer
sur Recharger pour actualiser la base des paquets.
C'est comme si un apt-get update était exécuté de manière automatique
avant même le lancement du logiciel
Bonjour,
Avec Synaptic depuis quelques temps, je n'ai plus besoin de cliquer
sur Recharger pour actualiser la base des paquets.
C'est comme si un apt-get update était exécuté de manière automatique avant
même le lancement du logiciel.
D'où vient ce comportement ?
--
Michel Grentzinger
Le ven 27 avr 2007 00:30:40 CEST, Pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Toujours suite à la migration Sarge Etch, j'obtiens le message suivant
lorsque je lance un apt-get update:
W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release: Les
signatures suivantes n'ont pas pu être
Le 27 avr. 07 à 08:20, Frédéric BOITEUX a écrit :
Le ven 27 avr 2007 00:30:40 CEST, Pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Toujours suite à la migration Sarge Etch, j'obtiens le message
suivant
lorsque je lance un apt-get update:
W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release
Franck Joncourt, vendredi 27 avril 2007, 01:09:10 CEST
[...]
L'exemple est fonctionnel mais n'a plus d'interet a ce jour puisqu'il
semble que la clef necessaire soit passee dans le package
*debian-multimedia-keyring*
Au passage, quelqu'un pourrait-il m'indiquer ou se trouve se package ?
Pierre a écrit :
Toujours suite à la migration Sarge Etch, j'obtiens le message suivant
lorsque je lance un apt-get update:
W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release: Les
signatures suivantes n'ont pas pu être véifiées car la clé publique
n'est pas disponible: NO_PUBKEY
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:30:40AM +0200, Pierre wrote:
Toujours suite à la migration Sarge Etch, j'obtiens le message suivant
lorsque je lance un apt-get update:
W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release: Les
signatures suivantes n'ont pas pu être véifiées car la clé
the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B907
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
¯¯¯
le run apt-get update to correct these problems n'a rien arrangé...
une idée ?
si ça a voir avec http
:
NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B907
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
¯¯¯
le run apt-get update to correct these problems n'a rien arrangé...
une idée ?
si ça a voir avec http://keyring.debian.org/;
et ben, merci
: http://debian-multimedia.org etch Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B907
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
¯¯¯
(À mettre dans
lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://debian-multimedia.org etch Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B907
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
Failed to fetch ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/Release.gpg Data
socket timed out [IP: 128.101.240.212 21]
Reading package lists... Done
W: Conflicting distribution: http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release
(expected stable but got etch)
W: You may want to run apt-get
(expected stable but got etch)
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
etch is stable? I didn't think that would ever happen.
You've obviously have not been around long, Sarge was fo'ever in
Testing, about 3 years.
Yes Etch was released Yesterday (April 8th 2007, 9:15AM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Hyslop escribió:
Hi, all
The more I learn, the less I know :-)
I've seen several people on this list recommending that we run 'apt-get
update' and 'apt-get upgrade' on a regular basis. What are your thoughts
on setting up a cron job to do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, all
The more I learn, the less I know :-)
I've seen several people on this list recommending that we run 'apt-get
update' and 'apt-get upgrade' on a regular basis. What are your thoughts
on setting up a cron job to do it automatically, say once
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:27:41PM -0400, Jim Hyslop wrote:
Hi, all
The more I learn, the less I know :-)
I've seen several people on this list recommending that we run 'apt-get
update' and 'apt-get upgrade' on a regular basis. What are your thoughts
on setting up a cron job to do
Jim Hyslop wrote:
I've seen several people on this list recommending that we run 'apt-get
update' and 'apt-get upgrade' on a regular basis. What are your thoughts
on setting up a cron job to do it automatically, say once a month or
once a week?
You might be safe to do that on a stable system
a little on the kinds of things that might go wrong? I must
admit that when I do run apt-get update/upgrade, I don't always look
over things thoroughly.
The machine, by the way, is mostly for experimental use, so I can learn
about the GNU/Linux world (having spent most of my computer days
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:27:41PM -0400, Jim Hyslop wrote:
[automating apt-get]
cron-apt
Oh, cool. See? I know even less now! Isn't that wonderful? :-)
- --
Jim Hyslop
Dreampossible: Better software. Simply.
of things that might go wrong? I must
admit that when I do run apt-get update/upgrade, I don't always look
over things thoroughly.
Fer 'xample:
I just pulled an old box out of mothballs (having just had a mobo die on
me in my regular box), and ran aptitude update on it. Here's the results
Kent West wrote:
Jim Hyslop wrote:
Kent West wrote:
[...]
In short, there's too much that can go wrong if you don't pay
attention,
so I personally would not go the route of automation. Others may
disagree.
I was wondering if there would be any issues like that. Can you
elaborate a
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:32:54 -0500
Kent West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Hyslop wrote:
I've seen several people on this list recommending that we run 'apt-get
update' and 'apt-get upgrade' on a regular basis. What are your thoughts
on setting up a cron job to do it automatically, say once
es así, cómo encuentro esta lista de
paquete? y sobre todo como la restauro?
Espero puedas ayudarme amigo. Gracias.
From: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Error de lectura en apt-get update.
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:33:44 -0600
Spanish debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Error de lectura en apt-get update.
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:01:22 -0500
El lun, 12-03-2007 a las 20:51 +, David Primero Segundo escribió:
bueno amigos, comprobé el disco con fsck y la verdad no me proporciona
mucha
información, vaya
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:35:32AM +, David Primero Segundo wrote:
Bueno gracias por contestar y preocuparte amigo, pero sigo sin resolver el
problema, ya intenté varias veces lo que me propusistes, es decir, borrar
los *.deb e actualizar de nuevo, pero que va sigo sin poder hacer apt-get
Hola David,
Am 2007-03-08 10:44:53, schrieb David Primero Segundo:
linex-inWpyZ:/var/lib/dpkg# apt-get update
Des:1 http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Packages [491kB]
Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages
Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Release
Obj http
actualizar
paquetes, este error es:
http://pastebin.ca/392151
por favor si puedes o podeis sacarme de este problema estaría muy
agradecido. gracias.
From: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Error de lectura en apt-get update.
Date
El lun, 12-03-2007 a las 20:51 +, David Primero Segundo escribió:
bueno amigos, comprobé el disco con fsck y la verdad no me proporciona mucha
información, vaya salida que tiene más escueta y ridícula, parece que le
cuesta al desarrollador escribiri unas palabras joder. Bueno la salida es
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 08:51:19PM +, David Primero Segundo wrote:
bueno amigos, comprobé el disco con fsck y la verdad no me proporciona
mucha información, vaya salida que tiene más escueta y ridícula, parece
que le cuesta al desarrollador escribiri unas palabras joder. Bueno la
salida
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 08:51:19PM +, David Primero Segundo wrote:
bueno amigos, comprobé el disco con fsck y la verdad no me proporciona
mucha información, vaya salida que tiene más escueta y ridícula, parece que
le cuesta al desarrollador escribiri unas palabras joder. Bueno la salida
opciones ejecutarlo por ejemplo, gracias.
From: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Primero Segundo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Error de lectura en apt-get update.
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:21:45 -0600
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 06:59
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 11:37:54AM +, David Primero Segundo wrote:
From: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ese sistema de archivos está dañado. Pasate *inmediatamente* a modo
monousuario y revisalo con fsck.
Hola amigo, sigo con el problema, ahora me encuentro en modo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
El 09/03/07 23:06, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz escribió:
En todo caso: Sí, necesitas desmontar el disco
umount /dev/hda2
o pasarlo a modo solo lectura:
mount /dev/hda2 -oremount,ro
No. Esto sería así:
mount /dev/hda2 -o remount,ro
Y luego,
buenas, el problema es que al hace un apt-get update obtengo el siguiente
error:
linex-inWpyZ:/var/lib/dpkg# apt-get update
Des:1 http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Packages [491kB]
Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages
Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Release
Obj http
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:20:57AM +, David Primero Segundo wrote:
buenas, el problema es que al hace un apt-get update obtengo el siguiente
error:
linex-inWpyZ:/var/lib/dpkg# apt-get update
...
E: Error de lectura - read (5 Error de entrada/salida)
...
Lo unico que he detectado que
.old
(cambiando la extensión old por supuesto) y luego hice de nuevo todo el
repertorio de comandos aconsejados en estos casos:
apt-get clean
apt-get autoclean
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
pero de nuevo en apt-get upgrade me dice que:
linex-inWpyZ:/home/david# apt-get update
Obj http
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 06:59:51PM +, David Primero Segundo wrote:
hola amigo, gracias por contestar, pues sí tengo respaldo, en el directorio
var/lib/dpkg/ exiten los archivos available.old y status.old que no están
corrompidos o si lo están por lo menos no dan el error de lectura
hi, my problem is the next:
when i run apt-get update, debian says me:
linex-inWpyZ:/var/lib/dpkg# apt-get update
Des:1 http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Packages [491kB]
Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages
Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Release
Obj http
Hellol David.
David Primero Segundo, 08.03.2007 11:44:
hi, my problem is the next:
when i run apt-get update, debian says me:
linex-inWpyZ:/var/lib/dpkg# apt-get update
Des:1 http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Packages [491kB]
Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages
Obj http
Hi,
hi, my problem is the next:
when i run apt-get update, debian says me:
...
E: Error de lectura - read (5 Error de entrada/salida)
E: No se pudieron analizar o abrir las listas de paquetes o el
archivo de estado.
my sourcelist is this:
deb http://apt.linex.org/linex2006 sarge
update, but i don't get luck.
From: Cédric Lucantis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: problems with apt-get update
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:14:32 +0100
Hi,
hi, my problem is the next:
when i run apt-get update, debian says me:
...
E: Error de lectura - read (5
no friend, the error continues, i try this:
linex-inWpyZ:/etc/apt# cat apt.conf
APT
{
APT::Cache-Limit 1;
CDROM
{
NoMount True;
};
};
hmm, not sure about it, but maybe APT::Cache-Limit inside APT{} is redundant
and not understood
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:11:24 +0100
Florian Kulzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Install the package debian-archive-keyring; it has the key that you
need:
Thanks!
It works now without any error messages!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática escribió:
Bueno, hoy traté de actualizar los servidores del trabajo y en 2 de
ellos recibí ese mensaje:
Des:1 http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release.gpg [189B]
Obj http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release
Des:2 http://ftp.br.debian.org
On 3/6/07, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática escribió:
Bueno, hoy traté de actualizar los servidores del trabajo y en 2 de
ellos recibí ese mensaje:
Des:1 http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release.gpg [189B]
Obj
Carlos Zuniga wrote:
On 3/5/07, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bueno, hoy traté de actualizar los servidores del trabajo y en 2 de
ellos recibí ese mensaje:
Des:1 http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release.gpg [189B]
Obj http://security.debian.org
On 3/5/07, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bueno, hoy traté de actualizar los servidores del trabajo y en 2 de
ellos recibí ese mensaje:
Des:1 http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release.gpg [189B]
Obj http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release
Des:2
Bueno, hoy traté de actualizar los servidores del trabajo y en 2 de
ellos recibí ese mensaje:
Des:1 http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release.gpg [189B]
Obj http://security.debian.org etch/updates Release
Des:2 http://ftp.br.debian.org etch Release.gpg [189B]
Obj http://ftp.br.debian.org
Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática escribió:
Hola, instala el debian-archive-keyring para que te instale las llaves
firmadas de Debian.
Saludos
Ya está instalado.y según apt-get está en su versión más reciente.
Saludos
A mi me sucedió algo parecido(pero con la llave GPG) y no sólo
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:02:18AM -0200, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de
Matemática wrote:
http://security.debian.org/dists/etch/updates/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
La suma MD5 difiere
Eso quiere decir que el Packages.gz que descargaste está
corrupto. Quizá es por que te tocó hacer la descarga
Alejandro Garrido Mota escribió:
Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática escribió:
Hola, instala el debian-archive-keyring para que te instale las llaves
firmadas de Debian.
Saludos
Ya está instalado.y según apt-get está en su versión más reciente.
Saludos
A mi me sucedió algo
Hello,
At the end of the 'apt-get update' I get the follow output:
Fetched 74.6kB in 6s (11.3kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org testing Release: The following
signatures
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:03:02PM +0100, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
Hello,
At the end of the 'apt-get update' I get the follow output:
Fetched 74.6kB in 6s (11.3kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 13:03:02 +0100, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
Hello,
At the end of the 'apt-get update' I get the follow output:
Fetched 74.6kB in 6s (11.3kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error
Jonas Geiregat:
Hello,
At the end of the 'apt-get update' I get the follow output:
Fetched 74.6kB in 6s (11.3kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org testing Release
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 11:53:42 -0800
Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:03:02PM +0100, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
At the end of the 'apt-get update' I get the follow output:
Fetched 74.6kB in 6s
(11.3kB/s) Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error
Frank McCormick wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 11:53:42 -0800
Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:03:02PM +0100, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
At the end of the 'apt-get update' I get the follow output:
Fetched 74.6kB in 6s
(11.3kB/s) Reading package
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 20:19:29 -0500
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
Funny but I get the exact same error everytime I run aptitude
update - but the second time I run it I get no error. And yes
debian-archive-keyring is on my machine. Weird.
:
At the end of the 'apt-get update' I get the follow output:
Fetched 74.6kB in 6s
(11.3kB/s) Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org testing Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY
Tom Allison wrote:
I am running into this repeatedly on one machine in particular.
I don't have a memory problem (apt::cache or hardware).
I've been able to run apt-get update on other boxes in the same network
and it works OK. But this keeps stopping at 99% and appears to hang
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 05:16:27PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
I am running into this repeatedly on one machine in particular.
I don't have a memory problem (apt::cache or hardware).
I've been able to run apt-get update on other boxes in the same network and
it works OK. But this keeps
I am running into this repeatedly on one machine in particular.
I don't have a memory problem (apt::cache or hardware).
I've been able to run apt-get update on other boxes in the same network and it
works OK. But this keeps stopping at 99% and appears to hang.
And while apt-get update
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 05:37:38PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 05:16:27PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
I am running into this repeatedly on one machine in particular.
I don't have a memory problem (apt::cache or hardware).
I've been able to run apt-get update
Ishwar Rattan:
Just saw this:
W: GPG error: http://ftp.us.debian.org testing Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY A70DAF536070D3A1
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
#
How do I fix
Hola a todos,
Tengo un problema cuando ejecuto apt-get update en mi Etch:
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
W: GPG error: http://mirrors.kernel.org etch Release: Las siguientes
firms fueron inválidas: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian Archive Automatic
Signing Key (2006) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W
://wiki.debian.org/SecureApt *
W: Tal vez quiera ejecutar 'apt-get update' para corregir estos problemas
Ignora este mensaje. Apt lo imprime siempre que hay cualquier problema
en el update, por que la mayoría de ellos son errores transitorios en
la red que efectivamente se solucionan repitiendo la
El mar, 14-11-2006 a las 11:54 -0600, Carlos Velásquez escribió:
Hola a todos,
Tengo un problema cuando ejecuto apt-get update en mi Etch:
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
W: GPG error: http://mirrors.kernel.org etch Release: Las siguientes
firms fueron inválidas: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F
Hallo Ihr!
Bevor sich alle wundern:
Auf einer anderen Liste (Postfix) wurde es schon diskutiert,
momentan (11:00) gibt es wohl ein Routingproblem (Loop):.
tracepath ftp.debian.de
27: 141.30.1.157 (141.30.1.157) asymm 10 16.658ms
28: 141.30.1.158 (141.30.1.158)
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:01:21 +0200 Matthias Haegele wrote:
Bevor sich alle wundern:
Auf einer anderen Liste (Postfix) wurde es schon diskutiert,
momentan (11:00) gibt es wohl ein Routingproblem (Loop):.
Um die Info zu erweitern:
ftp.de.debian.org zieht derzeit um, im selben RZ, aber in einen
Evgeni Golov schrieb:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:01:21 +0200 Matthias Haegele wrote:
Bevor sich alle wundern:
Auf einer anderen Liste (Postfix) wurde es schon diskutiert,
momentan (11:00) gibt es wohl ein Routingproblem (Loop):.
Um die Info zu erweitern:
ftp.de.debian.org zieht derzeit um, im
When I run apt-get update, I get this error, after having gotten an error
because it couldn't
find a file in /var/lib/apt/lists/partial, which I touch'd to make exist.
W: GPG error: ftp://debian.lcs.mit.edu testing Release: Unknown error executing
gpgv
W: You may want to run apt-get update
aladdin wrote:
When I run apt-get update, I get this error, after having gotten an error
because it couldn't find a file in /var/lib/apt/lists/partial, which I
touch'd to make exist.
W: GPG error: ftp://debian.lcs.mit.edu testing Release: Unknown error
executing gpgv W: You may want to run
main contrib
non-free
, then did
# apt-get update
# apt-get install kmobiletools
, but the output was:
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation
, then did
# apt-get update
# apt-get install kmobiletools
, but the output was:
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution
-free
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib
non-free
Note the mismatch above. You are getting binary packages from testing
and source packages from unstable.
, then did
# apt-get update
# apt-get install kmobiletools
, but the output was:
Reading Package
://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib
non-free
Note the mismatch above. You are getting binary packages from testing
and source packages from unstable.
, then did
# apt-get update
# apt-get install
Bonjour,
Sur un de mes serveurs en Etch, j'ai fait un apt-get update qui m'a sorti
d'étranges lignes. En plus des lignes que je vois habituellement genre :
Get:2 http://ftp.fr.debian.org etch Release [35.4kB]
J'ai une centaines de lignes de ce genre :
Get:29 2006-06-23-1348.02
Slackwave wrote:
Bonjour,
Sur un de mes serveurs en Etch, j'ai fait un apt-get update qui m'a sorti
d'étranges lignes. En plus des lignes que je vois habituellement genre :
Get:2 http://ftp.fr.debian.org etch Release [35.4kB]
J'ai une centaines de lignes de ce genre
Le Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 01:53:06PM +0200, D. Soulayrol a écrit :
Slackwave wrote:
J'ai une centaines de lignes de ce genre :
Get:29 2006-06-23-1348.02.pdiff [14.7kB]
Get:30 2006-06-23-1348.02.pdiff [8147B]
Get:31 2006-06-23-1348.02.pdiff [8147B]
Get:32 2006-06-23-1348.02.pdiff
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 01:53:06PM +0200, D. Soulayrol a écrit :
Slackwave wrote:
J'ai une centaines de lignes de ce genre :
Get:29 2006-06-23-1348.02.pdiff [14.7kB]
Get:30 2006-06-23-1348.02.pdiff [8147B]
Get:31 2006-06-23-1348.02.pdiff [8147B]
Get:32
.
Dans ce cas, on peut demander à apt de ne pas utiliser cette nouvelle
fonctionnalité en ajoutant :
Acquire::Pdiffs { false; };
dans apt.conf.
Ou encore sans utiliser le fichier apt.conf :
apt-get update -o Acquire::Pdiffs=false
Fred
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question
Hi,
habe heute in meine sources.list folgenden Server eingetragen:
http://www.debian-multimedia.org
Seit dem tritt bei apt-get update dieser Fehler auf:
W: GPG error: http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key
Peter Jordan schrieb:
W: GPG error: http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
available: NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B90
Jemand ne Idee wie ich das zu beheben ist?
http://www.gestreift.net/content/view/29/27/
Gruß
Stefan Bauer schrieb:
Peter Jordan schrieb:
W: GPG error: http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
available: NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B90
Jemand ne Idee wie ich das zu beheben ist?
Am Freitag, den 21.07.2006, 09:17 +0200 schrieb Stefan Bauer:
Peter Jordan schrieb:
W: GPG error: http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
available: NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B90
Jemand ne Idee wie ich das zu
/security.debian.org_dists_etch_updates_contrib_binary-i386_Packages)
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
)
W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://security.debian.org
etch/updates/contrib Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_etch_updates_contrib_binary-i386_Packages)
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
:
deb http://debian.ethz.ch/debian/ stable main non-free
deb-src http://debian.ethz.ch/debian/ stable main non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main non-free
deb file:/home/samuel debs/
4)
# apt-get update
Ign file: debs/ Release
OK http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main
-scanpackages . /dev/null Packages
3)
Meine source.list:
deb http://debian.ethz.ch/debian/ stable main non-free
deb-src http://debian.ethz.ch/debian/ stable main non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main non-free
deb file:/home/samuel debs/
4)
# apt-get update
Ign file: debs
On 06.07.06 23:54:45, Samuel Bächler wrote:
Hallo Leute
Ign file: debs/ Release
5)
Meine Frage: Wieso bringt dieser Schlingel Ign file: debs/ Release
Gegenfrage: Hast du eine Release Datei angelegt? ;-)
BTW: apt-ftparchive finde ich einfacher zu benutzen als
dpkg-scanpackages.
Andreas
--
source.list:
deb http://debian.ethz.ch/debian/ stable main non-free
deb-src http://debian.ethz.ch/debian/ stable main non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main non-free
deb file:/home/samuel debs/
4)
# apt-get update
Ign file: debs/ Release
OK http://security.debian.org stable
2006/7/1, Marco Rist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hallo *,
seit einiger Zeit scheitern bei mir einfache Aufrufe eines 'aptitude
update' bzw. 'apt-get update' mit folgender Ausgabe:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package
501 - 600 of 1680 matches
Mail list logo
