On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:20:38PM -0700, John Conover wrote:
Running apt-get update on one of my machines gives:
W: Failed to fetch
Darac Marjal writes:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:20:38PM -0700, John Conover wrote:
Running apt-get update on one of my machines gives:
W: Failed to fetch
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:20:38PM -0700, John Conover wrote:
Running apt-get update on one of my machines gives:
W: Failed to fetch
Running apt-get update on one of my machines gives:
W: Failed to fetch
copy:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/Debian%20GNU_Linux%207%20%5fWheezy%5f%20-%20Official%20Snapshot%20i386%20LIVE_INSTALL%20Binary%2020140723-18:32_dists_wheezy_main_binary-i386_Packages
Failed to stat - stat (2: No such
Hello,
We have 2 (of out many) machines that will not do a apt-get update
properly (since the 4.0 upgrade a couple days ago). These 2 machine are
old but have working just fine. The message I get on both of these
machines are:
Get:5 http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Sources
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:42:34AM -0700, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
Hello,
We have 2 (of out many) machines that will not do a apt-get update
properly (since the 4.0 upgrade a couple days ago). These 2 machine are
old but have working just fine. The message I get on both of
Hi,
habe heute in meine sources.list folgenden Server eingetragen:
http://www.debian-multimedia.org
Seit dem tritt bei apt-get update dieser Fehler auf:
W: GPG error: http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
Peter Jordan schrieb:
W: GPG error: http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
available: NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B90
Jemand ne Idee wie ich das zu beheben ist?
http://www.gestreift.net/content/view/29/27/
Gruß
Stefan Bauer schrieb:
Peter Jordan schrieb:
W: GPG error: http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
available: NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B90
Jemand ne Idee wie ich das zu beheben ist?
Am Freitag, den 21.07.2006, 09:17 +0200 schrieb Stefan Bauer:
Peter Jordan schrieb:
W: GPG error: http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
available: NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B90
Jemand ne Idee wie ich das zu
Hey List,
I did KNOPPIX 4.0.2 HD installation. the problem is that I could not get apt-get
to install or remove any package. When I tried apt-get update I got the
following message.
###
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib/apt/lists# apt-get update
E: Could not get lock /var/lib/apt/lists/lock - open (11
Pessoal,
seguinte, alguém já viu este erro no apt-get
update
there are no public key available for the following
key ids
é uma máquina nova e seu primeiro apt-get update...
mas está apresentando este erro...
alguém sabe do que se trata?
Harlei
Em Seg 09 Jan 2006 12:48, Harlei escreveu:
Pessoal,
seguinte, alguém já viu este erro no apt-get update
there are no public key available for the following key ids
é uma máquina nova e seu primeiro apt-get update... mas está apresentando
este erro...
alguém sabe do que se trata?
Harlei
@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: apt-get update problem
Em Seg 09 Jan 2006 12:48, Harlei escreveu:
Pessoal,
seguinte, alguém já viu este erro no apt-get update
there are no public key available for the following key ids
é uma máquina nova e seu primeiro
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:48:55 -0300
Harlei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there are no public key available for the following key ids
# gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 010908312D230C5F
# gpg --armor --export 2D230C5F | apt-key add -
--
Savio Martins Ramos - Arquiteto
Rio de Janeiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: apt-get update problem
Em Seg 09 Jan 2006 12:48, Harlei escreveu:
Pessoal,
seguinte, alguém já viu este erro no apt-get update
there are no public key available
Hello.
I added entries to my sources.list, but i can't get the related packages :
my sources.list
--
deb ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
deb-src ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
deb
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:10:12 +0200
Hubert Mercier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I added entries to my sources.list, but i can't get the related packages
:
my sources.list
--
deb ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
deb-src
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
ich erhalte folgenden Fehler beim Versuch eines apt-get update.
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing nntpcache (NewVersion1)
E: Problem with MergeList
Moin Jan!
Jan Hill schrieb am Thursday, den 23. January 2003:
Hallo,
ich erhalte folgenden Fehler beim Versuch eines apt-get update.
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing nntpcache (NewVersion1)
Am Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2003 15:52 schrieb Jan Hill:
Hallo,
ich erhalte folgenden Fehler beim Versuch eines apt-get update.
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing nntpcache (NewVersion1)
E:
Hallom Jan,
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:52:07PM +0100, Jan Hill wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
ich erhalte folgenden Fehler beim Versuch eines apt-get update.
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E:
Am Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2003 18:47 schrieb Ruediger Pretzlaff:
Hi Ruediger,
sorry für die pm, kriegs net gebacken mit dem raschen klicki-bunti
Das letzte Upgrade auf 3.0r1 hat noch geklappt.
Hatte ich gestern auch. Habe für einen durchlauf alle einträge mit
nonfree und unstable aus der
Hallo Jörg-Thomas,
* Jörg-Thomas Krug schrieb [23-01-03 18:43]:
Am Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2003 15:52 schrieb Jan Hill:
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
Googlen mit Dynamic MMap ran out of room
Soviel zum Thema: Wie lange soll man suchen, bevor man hier
fragt...
Gruss Udo
--
Alkohol
On 23.Jan 2003 - 18:47:44, Ruediger Pretzlaff wrote:
Hallom Jan,
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:52:07PM +0100, Jan Hill wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
ich erhalte folgenden Fehler beim Versuch eines apt-get update.
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E:
Hallo alle...
Ein (noch) kleines Problem, das wahrscheinlich auf die Dauer störend
wirken könnte...
apt-get mag nimmer, und ich weiß nicht, was sich dagegen machen ließe.
So sieht das aus (das ganze als root, auch wenn's in meinem home
Verzeichnis war) :
debian-p166:/home/norbert# apt-get
On Wednesday 06 November 2002 12:29, Norbert Bottlaender-Prier wrote:
Hallo alle...
apt-get mag nimmer, und ich weiß nicht, was sich dagegen machen
ließe. So sieht das aus (das ganze als root, auch wenn's in meinem
home Verzeichnis war) :
debian-p166:/home/norbert# apt-get update
(.)
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 07:28:09PM -0400, Jerome Acks Jr wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:41:36AM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Hello,
did an apt-get update upgrade on my sid box (after two weeks) and I
got an error. When I redo the upgrade part I get this:
Reading Package Lists...
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:07:09AM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Setting up binutils (2.12.90.0.1-2) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/binutils.config: dpkg-architecture: command not found
This is bug #142744.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello,
did an apt-get update upgrade on my sid box (after two weeks) and I
got an error. When I redo the upgrade part I get this:
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back
gettext links scrollkeeper
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:41:36AM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Hello,
did an apt-get update upgrade on my sid box (after two weeks) and I
got an error. When I redo the upgrade part I get this:
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages have
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:21:53 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Hallo Andreas,
erstmal Danke für die Infos. Das System habe ich jetz kapiert, welche
Versionnummer ich nehmen muß auch.
Eine Verständnisfrage bleibt noch offen:
Wonach wurde bei meinen identischen Versionen entschieden, welche Version
Reinhard Foerster schrieb:
auch über die apt/sources.list zugänglich machen. Trotzdem gewinnt
immer das original von Debian. Woher weiß apt, welches Paket das
Original ist?
apt-get versucht Pakete mit identischer Bezeichung immer in der
Reihenfolge zu beziehen, wie die Quellen in
Hi!,
I am trying to upgrade my system (potato 2.2.r5 + ximian gnome). After typing
apt-get update
I get the following error message:
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Malformed provides line
E: Error occured while processing gnumeric (NewVersion1)
E: Problem with
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
apt-get update
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Malformed provides line
E: Error occured while processing gnumeric (NewVersion1)
E: Problem with MergeList
/var/state/apt/lists/red-carpet.ximian.com_debian_dists_stable_main_binary-i386_Packages
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:10:01 -0200, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
I am trying to upgrade my system (potato 2.2.r5 + ximian gnome). After typing
apt-get update
I get the following error message:
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Malformed provides line
Hi Erik,
thank you very much, your suggestion worked perfectly.
By the way, I've noted that in the last upgrades of ximian-gnome, several
problems arises. I wonder if the ximian people is careful enough, as least
with respect to the debian distribution...
Regards,
Marcelo
On Wed, Feb 06,
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:36:48AM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
Happened to me to this morning. It seems that the Ximian people
introduced a version number in brackets after the line:
Provides: ximian-gnumeric
in the file you mention under Gnumeric section.
They did *what*? Surely
Hi all
I'm doing a simple basic apt-get update and it produces no available file. This
used to work ok but for some reason no new available file is created anymore.
I got rid of the old one with dpkg --clear-avail but it did not help. The system
is potato on intel hw. Some error message should
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 12:44:43PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I'm doing a simple basic apt-get update and it produces no available
file. This used to work ok but for some reason no new available file is
created anymore. I got rid of the old one with dpkg --clear-avail but it
Hi everybody!
I've been quite happily running Debian GNU/Linux woody since a while.
But yesterday I installed large amount of new debs (I didn't update for
time reasons since july or so) and now apt-get behaves strange and I
don't know why. It has worked with the same /etc/apt/apt.conf and the
every few days i run apt-get update and apt-get upgrade to keep my 'potato'
system up to date. today I see the following:
stimpy:~# apt-get update
Hit http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages
Get:1 http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/main Packages [14.4kB]
Get:2
I've even went into /var/state/lists and wacked all of the 'old' ones in
there
and then rebuilt using apt-get update again.
you might be hitting a mirror that is unhappy, or one that is updating.
- Original Message -
From: William Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 5:19 PM
Subject: sudden apt-get update problem
I had the very same exact thing happen to me today also, with the same
output as you have shown...
I'll try
Me again!
Apropos update/upgrade capabilities. Recently my modem-ppp connection
broke, while apt-get update was in progress. Since then there seems
to be a problem with apt-get update, it says:
Hit http://security.debian.org potato/updates/main Packages
Hit http://security.debian.org
45 matches
Mail list logo