Re: apt-get upgrade broke apache

2000-09-29 Thread Jürgen A. Erhard
> "George" == George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Is this just par for the course when running woody stuff? Occasionally stuff >> breaks for a while? I do not know what mod_rewrite.so does, but I commented it >> out and the server came up. Any ideas on what to

Re: apt-get upgrade broke apache

2000-09-27 Thread George Bonser
> > Is this just par for the course when running woody stuff? Occasionally stuff > breaks for a while? I do not know what mod_rewrite.so does, but I commented > it > out and the server came up. Any ideas on what to do to find out what broke > and how to fix it? Yeah, I never take a libc upgra

RE: apt-get upgrade broke apache

2000-09-27 Thread Jeremy L. Gaddis
- Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Original Message- From: William Jensen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 1:24 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject:apt-get upgrade broke apache After a apt-get upgrade I see: Syntax error o

RE: apt-get upgrade broke apache

2000-09-27 Thread Pollywog
It's like someone said a while ago; it is called "unstable" for a reason. I usually don't upgrade packages that might break the system, but I forgot my own rule this evening :( -- Andrew On 27-Sep-2000 William Jensen wrote: > After a apt-get upgrade I see: > > Syntax error on line 221 of /etc/a

apt-get upgrade broke apache

2000-09-27 Thread William Jensen
After a apt-get upgrade I see: Syntax error on line 221 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_rewrite.so into server: symbol dbm_close, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libdb.so.3 with link time reference /usr/sbin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started Is this