On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 08:27:11PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> Apt-get, which worked so well when I went from 2.0 -> 2.1, is being a royal
> grade "A" bastard (pardon my French!) now. Maybe I'm missing something
> obvious:
>
> - The sources file is set up for
> deb h
just a FYI, about a week or 2 ago, the stable branch changed to 2.2 so
you were actually trying to go from 2.0 -> 2.2.
nate
Nick Cook wrote:
>
> FWIW, I fixed my apt-get problem by following the old adage: when in
> doubt, blow it out.
>
> I purged apt from my system, manually ftp'ed (if that's
FWIW, I fixed my apt-get problem by following the old adage: when in
doubt, blow it out.
I purged apt from my system, manually ftp'ed (if that's a verb!) apt from
the slink/admin directory, and re-installed via dpkg.
Apt-get now goes online, gets the potato stable lists with no problem, and
star
Subject: apt-get won't play
Date: Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 08:27:11PM -0700
In reply to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> WARNING: Please push yourself back from the monitor for on
On 21-Aug-00 Nate Bargmann wrote:
> Maybe it is your DNS. Dose nslookup give you an address when you give it
> a site name like http.us.debian.org?
>
> At a loss myself...
nslookup responded with my IP address and a bunch of http.us.debian.org
addresses...
---
- Nick -
[EMAIL PRO
On 21-Aug-00 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> Sounds like your DNS is foobar, unless you made a spelling error.
At my ISP? I'm not having any other trouble with Net stuff, and I can FTP into
the Debian locales with no problem (other than "too many users").
---
- Nick -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - apt-get update complains it can't resolve the above address, complains it
> can't run a stats on the earlier packages on the system, then suggests I run
> apt-get update!
Sounds like your DNS is foobar, unless you made a spelling error.
Jason
WARNING: Please push yourself back from the monitor for one second.
AAH!
Thank you.
Apt-get, which worked so well when I went from 2.0 -> 2.1, is being a royal
grade "A" bastard (pardon my French!) now. Maybe I'm missing
8 matches
Mail list logo