On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:03:53 +0100
Angus Hedger wrote:
Hello Angus,
> > I'm in the UK too, using http://ft.uk.debian.org.
Typo; should be http://ftp.uk.debian.org, of course.
> speed from this server is pretty low! Thanks!
YW, Angus.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:21:06 +0100
Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:28:40 +0100
> AG wrote:
>
> Hello AG,
>
> > That's quite possible - hadn't considered that. However, the UK
> > must still be on the British summer holidays because this has been
> > several
>
> I'm in the UK too
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:28:40 +0100
AG wrote:
Hello AG,
> That's quite possible - hadn't considered that. However, the UK must
> still be on the British summer holidays because this has been several
I'm in the UK too, using http://ft.uk.debian.org.
> I'm selfishly relieved that it wasn't som
On 09/09/10 21:55, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:51:56 +0100
AG wrote:
Hello AG,
So in addition to the grave bugs in apt there are hash sum errors in
qt4-X11 files? How do I sidestep these bugs and try to maintain an
otherwise up-to-date system?
I waited for a day, and
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:51:56 +0100
AG wrote:
Hello AG,
> So in addition to the grave bugs in apt there are hash sum errors in
> qt4-X11 files? How do I sidestep these bugs and try to maintain an
> otherwise up-to-date system?
I waited for a day, and then retried. The files with the hash mis
Greetings all
Has anyone else come across this when upgrading testing using Update
Manager? I'm using Gnome, but suspect that that doesn't matter too much
given this is system-wide rather than DE-specific.
Updates have been backed up for several days now due to some errors with
apt and qt4-
6 matches
Mail list logo
