Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
I highly recommend giving aptitude a whirl. It handles this setup much
better than dselect.
Very nice tool - thanks for the pointer! If I understand correctly
what it was telling me last night, it looks like mozilla-browser 1.2.1
depends on libc6, which
Jeff Cours wrote:
I generally manage packages using dselect. I'm running testing, but
would like to pick up a package or two from unstable (namely, Mozilla
1.2.1, rather than the 1.0.0 that's in stable). However, I'd still like
the machine to be mostly based on testing and stable. Is there a w
* Jeff Cours ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021209 11:01]:
> I generally manage packages using dselect. I'm running testing, but
> would like to pick up a package or two from unstable (namely, Mozilla
> 1.2.1, rather than the 1.0.0 that's in stable). However, I'd still
> like the machine to be mostly base
Ron Johnson wrote:
From "apt-cache showpkg mozilla-browser":
sid: 1.2-1
sarge: 1.1-1
woody: 1.0.0-0.woody.1
I get something a little different with a fresh update this morning:
Package: mozilla-browser
Versions:
2:1.2.1-2(/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binar
4 matches
Mail list logo
