[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 17, 2004, at 5:51 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004 Oct 16 21:56 -0500]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone suggest how else to learn more about aptitude's problem
with these "kept back" packages?
Thanks!
Which packages are you referring to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 17, 2004, at 5:51 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004 Oct 16 21:56 -0500]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone suggest how else to learn more about aptitude's problem
with these "kept back" packages?
Thanks!
Which packages are you referring to
On Oct 17, 2004, at 5:51 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004 Oct 16 21:56 -0500]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone suggest how else to learn more about aptitude's problem
with these "kept back" packages?
Thanks!
Which packages are you referring to exactly?
Regards,
The li
--- rds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The thing is I install all my packages using aptitude. If I use apt-get, I
> believe the aptitude database will be out of synch and I'd like to avoid
> that.
>
> I tried "aptitude dist-upgrade bind9 dnsutils --simulate" but that offers me
> to
> install 626 NE
--- robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try apt-get install one of the packages and check the output.
> Robin
The thing is I install all my packages using aptitude. If I use apt-get, I
believe the aptitude database will be out of synch and I'd like to avoid that.
I tried "aptitude dist-upgrade bin
rds wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ran "aptitude upgrade --show-versions" today and got
the following. Can anyone
> shed some light on why these packages are kept back?
And what should I do about
> it (I'd like to keep the system in synch with
testing)?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
rds wrote:
Hi,
Ran "aptitude upgrade --show-versions" today and got the following. Can anyone
shed some light on why these packages are kept back? And what should I do about
it (I'd like to keep the system in synch with testing)?
Thanks in advance
--
Checking
Hi,
Ran "aptitude upgrade --show-versions" today and got the following. Can anyone
shed some light on why these packages are kept back? And what should I do about
it (I'd like to keep the system in synch with testing)?
Thanks in advance
--
Checking if the
* Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004 Oct 16 21:56 -0500]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Can anyone suggest how else to learn more about aptitude's problem
> >with these "kept back" packages?
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> Which packages are you referring to exactly?
> Regards,
This seems to be a new featu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone suggest how else to learn more about aptitude's problem
with these "kept back" packages?
Thanks!
Which packages are you referring to exactly?
Regards,
David.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On (16/10/04 16:05), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?
> Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 16:05:35 -0700
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME
> au
On Oct 7, 2004, at 3:59 AM, robin wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please explain why some packages might be "kept back", or
how I might find out?
I guess what I'd like to know is how to get more information about why
aptitude is concluding that these couple packages should be "kep
Brian Pack wrote:
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 13:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2004, at 1:11 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please explain why some packages might be "kept back", or
how I might find out?
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 13:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2004, at 1:11 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Can someone please explain why some packages might be "kept back", or
> >> how I might find out?
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=
On Oct 2, 2004, at 1:11 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please explain why some packages might be "kept back", or
how I might find out?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=aptitude
Enjoy.
Thanks for the tip, Thomas, but did you mean this problem has alr
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can someone please explain why some packages might be "kept back", or
> how I might find out?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=aptitude
Enjoy.
-- Thomas Adam
=
"The Linux Weekend Mechanic" -- http://linuxgazette.net
"TAG Editor"
I'm a long time apt-get user, trying to make sense of aptitude.
I really like aptitude's automatic dependancy tracking; but it keeps
"keeping packages back" whenever I run "aptitude dist-upgrade".
"apt-get dist-upgrade" doesn't keep packages back.
Examining these "kept back" packages in aptitude
17 matches
Mail list logo