David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Bob Proulx (b...@proulx.com):
> > When the program looks up the ftp.us.debian.org name it will get all
> > three of the above in some order. If your system is IPv6 capable it
> >...
>
> Thanks for that clear exposition. I myself have had no problem with
> these differ
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Brian wrote:
A comparison of the outputs from 'apt-config dump' on both laptops might
give something.
alas no!
after copying the /etc/apt directory from laptop2 to my laptop, the only
difference is
==> diff apt-config_dump.ch8 apt-config_dump.mynb
132c132
On Fri 15 May 2015 at 22:03:59 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Bob Proulx (b...@proulx.com):
>
> > When the program looks up the ftp.us.debian.org name it will get all
> > three of the above in some order. If your system is IPv6 capable it
> > will prefer the IPv6 address and always use it.
Quoting Bob Proulx (b...@proulx.com):
> When the program looks up the ftp.us.debian.org name it will get all
> three of the above in some order. If your system is IPv6 capable it
> will prefer the IPv6 address and always use it. If not then it will
> select one of the two IPv4 addresses and use
David Wright wrote:
> I noticed that on repeating the former, I got a very different file,
> and this might be because ftp.us.debian.org had resolved to a different
> IPv4 address (but IPv6 was the same).
$ host ftp.us.debian.org
ftp.us.debian.org has address 128.61.240.89
ftp.us.debian.org
Quoting Pierre Frenkiel (pierre.frenk...@gmail.com):
> hi David,
> At least for that problem I found the explanation, and was able to
> reproduce it on
> my personal web server. I imported the index.html from the us and fr sites,
> and the
> 3 files, Just try
>
> wget http://frenki
Brian wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > You are currently using:
> >
> > deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian jessie main
> >
> > That is okay. Good! But for the purpose of this task change that to
> > a different but still valid mirror. This would be a good time to try
> > out the new http redi
On Thu, 14 May 2015, David Wright wrote:
. . .
$ wget http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie/main/binary-amd64/Packages
--2015-05-14 11:28:30--
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie/main/binary-amd64/Packages
Resolving ftp.us.debian.org (ftp.us.debian.org)... 128.61.240.89,
64.50
Quoting Pierre Frenkiel (pierre.frenk...@gmail.com):
> On Wed, 13 May 2015, David Wright wrote:
>
> >What happens if you perform this sort of conversation:
> >. . .
> >~ $ wget
> >http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie/main/binary-amd64/Packages
> >~ $ md5sum Packages
> >~ $ wget http://ftp
On Wed 13 May 2015 at 12:55:16 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> You are currently using:
>
> deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian jessie main
>
> That is okay. Good! But for the purpose of this task change that to
> a different but still valid mirror. This would be a good time to try
> out the new
On Thu 14 May 2015 at 14:33:49 +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2015, Brian wrote:
>
> >Do we assume the problem laptop and laptop2 have the same versions of
> >apt? 'dpkg -l apt' for that.
>
> yes: 0.9.7.9+deb7u7
> It's the 1st thing I checked when I found this difference of b
Quoting Pierre Frenkiel (pierre.frenk...@gmail.com):
> On Wed, 13 May 2015, David Wright wrote:
>
> >What happens if you perform this sort of conversation:
> >. . .
> >~ $ wget
> >http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie/main/binary-amd64/Packages
> >~ $ md5sum Packages
> >~ $ wget http://ftp
On Thu, 14 May 2015, Brian wrote:
Do we assume the problem laptop and laptop2 have the same versions of
apt? 'dpkg -l apt' for that.
yes: 0.9.7.9+deb7u7
It's the 1st thing I checked when I found this difference of behaviuor.
I may-be forgot to say that the problem occurs with apt-get as
On Thu 14 May 2015 at 08:54:00 +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2015, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> >That is okay. Good! But for the purpose of this task change that to
> >a different but still valid mirror. This would be a good time to try
> >out the new http redirector which has just r
On Wed, 13 May 2015, David Wright wrote:
What happens if you perform this sort of conversation:
. . .
~ $ wget http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie/main/binary-amd64/Packages
~ $ md5sum Packages
~ $ wget http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie/InRelease
~ $ grep 854af4d1ea9bce473bd8
On Thu, 14 May 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
. . .
Good point. If the redirector is not permanently available, what is the point
of it? One is surely better off with a fast, near, high availability mirror?
I suppose the answer is that newer mirrors might be even faster.
But it might be worth having
On Thursday 14 May 2015 10:20:23 Brian wrote:
> On Thu 14 May 2015 at 00:24:19 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 May 2015 00:05:44 Brian wrote:
> > > To clarify my second comment:
> > >
> > > choose-mirror (2.62) unstable; urgency=medium
> > > * Update Mirrors.masterlist
> > > *
On Thu 14 May 2015 at 00:24:19 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 14 May 2015 00:05:44 Brian wrote:
> >
> > To clarify my second comment:
> >
> > choose-mirror (2.62) unstable; urgency=medium
> > * Update Mirrors.masterlist
> > * This update includes adding httpredir.debian.org, whic
On Thursday 14 May 2015 00:51:38 Paul E Condon wrote:
> On 20150513_2054+0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 May 2015 19:55:16 Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> > > > I have still the same problem with "Hash Sum mismatch"
> > > > Do you have any idea on how to fix it?
> >
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Bob Proulx wrote:
That is okay. Good! But for the purpose of this task change that to
a different but still valid mirror. This would be a good time to try
out the new http redirector which has just recently become an official
Debian resource.[1]
deb http://httpredir.deb
Quoting Brian (a...@cityscape.co.uk):
> On Wed 13 May 2015 at 20:54:52 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > We need to be offered this during a netinstall. I did a netinstall
> > yesterday,
> > and as usual was offered my bhoice of mirror in the UK. I chose my usual
> > because over the years it has
On 20150513_2054+0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 May 2015 19:55:16 Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> > > I have still the same problem with "Hash Sum mismatch"
> > > Do you have any idea on how to fix it?
> >
> > Is your system behind a proxy cache of some sort? This pro
On Thursday 14 May 2015 00:05:44 Brian wrote:
> On Wed 13 May 2015 at 23:30:27 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 May 2015 23:15:36 Brian wrote:
> > > On Wed 13 May 2015 at 20:54:52 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > > We need to be offered this during a netinstall. I did a netinstall
> > >
On Wed 13 May 2015 at 23:30:27 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 May 2015 23:15:36 Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 13 May 2015 at 20:54:52 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > > We need to be offered this during a netinstall. I did a netinstall
> > > yesterday, and as usual was offered my bhoice of m
On Wednesday 13 May 2015 23:15:36 Brian wrote:
> On Wed 13 May 2015 at 20:54:52 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > We need to be offered this during a netinstall. I did a netinstall
> > yesterday, and as usual was offered my bhoice of mirror in the UK. I
> > chose my usual because over the years it ha
On Wed 13 May 2015 at 20:54:52 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 May 2015 19:55:16 Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> > > I have still the same problem with "Hash Sum mismatch"
> > > Do you have any idea on how to fix it?
> >
> > Is your system behind a proxy cache of some
Quoting Pierre Frenkiel (pierre.frenk...@gmail.com):
> On Wed, 13 May 2015, David Wright wrote:
>
> >After you've tried the usual things like clearing /var/lib/apt/lists
> >and trying, say, ftp.uk.debian.org in your sources.list, I'd be
> >interested whether you still get the problem if you substi
On Wednesday 13 May 2015 19:55:16 Bob Proulx wrote:
> Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> > I have still the same problem with "Hash Sum mismatch"
> > Do you have any idea on how to fix it?
>
> Is your system behind a proxy cache of some sort? This problem is one
> sometimes seen when files of different
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/13/2015 05:15 AM, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
[snip]
> Anyway, I removed them, and after that the reference to wheezy in
> apt-get update disappeared, but I have still the same problem with
> "Hash Sum mismatch" Do you have any idea on how to fix i
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> I have still the same problem with "Hash Sum mismatch"
> Do you have any idea on how to fix it?
Is your system behind a proxy cache of some sort? This problem is one
sometimes seen when files of different ages are cached and served
causing the entire set of files to b
On Wed, 13 May 2015, David Wright wrote:
After you've tried the usual things like clearing /var/lib/apt/lists
and trying, say, ftp.uk.debian.org in your sources.list, I'd be
interested whether you still get the problem if you substitute
http: ftp: in sources.list.
I already tried all the u
Quoting Pierre Frenkiel (pierre.frenk...@gmail.com):
> Anyway, I removed them, and after that the reference to wheezy in
> apt-get update disappeared, but I have still the same problem
> with "Hash Sum mismatch"
> Do you have any idea on how to fix it?
After you've tried the usual things
On Tue, 12 May 2015, Bob Proulx wrote:
Check for additional configuration files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
which I expect you to find a file referencing linux.dropbox.com
wheezy.
At a guess I expect that file to be owned by a package. *If* there is a
file there *then* this will say what pack
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> Get: 11 http://linux.dropbox.com wheezy/main i386 Packages [1,150 B]
>
> why these references to wheezy?
Check for additional configuration files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
which I expect you to find a file referencing linux.dropbox.com
wheezy.
At a guess I expect that
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
(unless the problem
comes from my laptop config, but I don't see how, as I have no problem with
the Wheezy sources.list)
It seems I was wrong, as I tried "apt-get update" with a jessie sources.list
on an other amd64 laptop, and I got no error.
hi everybody,
I tried to upgrade my amd64 laptop to jessie, and still have the same problem
already reported 1 month ago.
I expected that it will be fixed when Jessie became the stable release (unless
the problem
comes from my laptop config, but I don't see how, as I have no problem with the
Wh
36 matches
Mail list logo
