Re: aspell with mutt

2003-12-04 Thread Brian Nelson
Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:41:34PM -0600 or thereabouts, Jacob S. wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 20:39:28 -0500 >> Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Well that's too bad, why now, has the license changed from before? >> > >> > I happen to like Aspell

Re: aspell with mutt

2003-11-26 Thread Stephen
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:41:34PM -0600 or thereabouts, Jacob S. wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 20:39:28 -0500 > Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well that's too bad, why now, has the license changed from before? > > > > I happen to like Aspell much better, so hopefully you can clarify > >

Re: aspell with mutt

2003-11-26 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Jacob S. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031125 21:47]: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 20:39:28 -0500 > Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well that's too bad, why now, has the license changed from before? > > > > I happen to like Aspell much better, so hopefully you can clarify > > what's the issue with the

Re: aspell with mutt

2003-11-25 Thread Jacob S.
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 20:39:28 -0500 Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well that's too bad, why now, has the license changed from before? > > I happen to like Aspell much better, so hopefully you can clarify > what's the issue with the Aspell license. I'm afraid I'm not a wealth of knowledge he

Re: aspell with mutt

2003-11-25 Thread Stephen
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:39:39PM -0800 or thereabouts, Bill Moseley wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:57:22PM -0500, Stephen wrote: > > What's the syntax to use to invoke aspell rather than ispell in ones > > muttrc? I've perused the fine manual, but I can't find an example of the > > syntax fo

Re: aspell with mutt

2003-11-25 Thread Stephen
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 04:52:49PM -0600 or thereabouts, Jacob S. wrote: > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:57:22 -0500 > Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What's the syntax to use to invoke aspell rather than ispell in ones > > muttrc? I've perused the fine manual, but I can't find an example of > >

Re: aspell with mutt

2003-11-25 Thread Bill Moseley
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:57:22PM -0500, Stephen wrote: > What's the syntax to use to invoke aspell rather than ispell in ones > muttrc? I've perused the fine manual, but I can't find an example of the > syntax for this function, as mutt assumes ispell by default. > set ispell="aspell -e -c" --

Re: aspell with mutt

2003-11-25 Thread Jacob S.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:57:22 -0500 Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's the syntax to use to invoke aspell rather than ispell in ones > muttrc? I've perused the fine manual, but I can't find an example of > the syntax for this function, as mutt assumes ispell by default. Why not stick with

aspell with mutt

2003-11-25 Thread Stephen
What's the syntax to use to invoke aspell rather than ispell in ones muttrc? I've perused the fine manual, but I can't find an example of the syntax for this function, as mutt assumes ispell by default. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont