Re: bad NICs vs bad routing question: potato

2000-04-26 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface > 192.168.3.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth2 according to then man-page and a real case in the last few days, this should help: route add -net 192.168.x.0/24 gw 192.168.x.1 eth? (provi

Re: bad NICs vs bad routing question: potato

2000-04-26 Thread Stan Kaufman
Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > > Here's the ifconfig output: > > ... > it looks good. > > > Here's dmesg: > > ... > don't know, what the multicast errors mean, but they should be harmless. > probably you got some dos tool to setup the card - try some options which > seem to have something to do wi

Re: bad NICs vs bad routing question: potato

2000-04-26 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> But I can't ping either of them from other boxes on their networks. I haven't > implemented any type of firewall yet; I'm just trying to connect. The question > is whether there is something wrong with the NICs or if it's something I > haven't > configured right (OK, I admit it--I'm a relative n

bad NICs vs bad routing question: potato

2000-04-25 Thread Stan Kaufman
I'm setting up a gateway box with potato on a scavenged P75 box with one newer Intel EtherExpress 10/100 PCI NIC (eth0) and two older Intel EtherExpress PRO/10 ISA NICs (eth1 and eth2). Target topology is a DMZ network and an internal network, both masqueraded to the outside. However, I've got pro