On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:33:20PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Regid Ichira wrote:
I didn't get response for a similar post on
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2013/06/msg01262.html. Is it
because the answers are too obvious?
Probably because debian-kernel is overwhelmed with the
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 08:14:40 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
1. What exactly are you concerned about that we can do something
about on the users list? Has bc been dropped from being a default
part of the most basic install?
bc is priority standard. Doesn't that mean that there are Debian
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Regid Ichira regi...@nt1.in wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 08:14:40 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
1. What exactly are you concerned about that we can do something
about on the users list? Has bc been dropped from being a default
part of the most basic install?
Regid Ichira wrote:
I didn't get response for a similar post on
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2013/06/msg01262.html. Is it
because the answers are too obvious?
Probably because debian-kernel is overwhelmed with the daily grind of
urgent bug reports. What you are asking about is
I didn't get response for a similar post on
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2013/06/msg01262.html. Is it
because the answers are too obvious?
bc, an arbitrary precision calculator language, is a kernel build
dependency since a long time ago. Should it be added to:
1. The
bc is a great shell calculator gadget!
It also needs to be completely re-written. Re-designed, too, which probably
factored into the motivations for writing Python and Ruby.
Heh. bc is one of those tools you want to fix, but aren't sure how, and so
you keep using it and keep ignoring that you
6 matches
Mail list logo
