On 15/01/16 08:47, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 04:50:04PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> ;-)
>>
>> And please, no group "hugs" among strangers. ;-)
> I remember a 'poster' I had years ago which read "There are no strangers
> here, only friends we haven't met." ;-)
What a good
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 14:36:24 +, you wrote:
>:-) O.K. Please, no group "hugs" among friends I haven't met yet. ;-) Let's
>wait until we know each other better. ;-)
My arms are at my sides where they belong. :-)
On Friday 15 January 2016 11:47:32 Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 04:50:04PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > ;-)
> >
> > And please, no group "hugs" among strangers. ;-)
>
> I remember a 'poster' I had years ago which read "There are no strangers
> here, only friends we haven't met."
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 04:50:04PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> ;-)
>
> And please, no group "hugs" among strangers. ;-)
I remember a 'poster' I had years ago which read "There are no strangers
here, only friends we haven't met." ;-)
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating
On Thursday 14 January 2016 16:07:56 Steve Matzura wrote:
> Whoa folks, let's apply the brakes.
>
> The fact is, if you think about it, Lisi is quite correct, but for a
> reason she may not even realize. Visually impaired people, at least
> those of us whose visual impairment is to the point where
Whoa folks, let's apply the brakes.
The fact is, if you think about it, Lisi is quite correct, but for a
reason she may not even realize. Visually impaired people, at least
those of us whose visual impairment is to the point where we don't use
print at all, don't hear in paragraphs, but anybody wh
On Thursday 14 January 2016 11:01:22 Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> On 13/01/16 19:08, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 January 2016 09:38:12 Steve Matzura wrote:
> >> And once again, I ask you to hand me the spatula so's I can scrape the
> >> egg off my face. I completely forgot I needed to `mkdir -
On 13/01/16 19:08, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 January 2016 09:38:12 Steve Matzura wrote:
>> And once again, I ask you to hand me the spatula so's I can scrape the
>> egg off my face. I completely forgot I needed to `mkdir -p' the mount
>> point directory! IT WORKS! Didn't I say I was mis
Jonathan,
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:07:47 +, you wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 04:38:12AM -0500, Steve Matzura wrote:
>> Now to look up the syntax for putting it into fstab to make it
>> permanent. THANK YOU AGAIN EVER SO MUCH!
>
>The syntax is
> /olddir /newdir none bind
On Thursday 14 January 2016 10:09:30 Steve Matzura wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 22:08:02 +, Lisi wrote:
> >On Wednesday 13 January 2016 09:38:12 Steve Matzura wrote:
> >> And once again, I ask you to hand me the spatula so's I can scrape the
> >> egg off my face. I completely forgot I needed to
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 22:08:02 +, Lisi wrote:
>On Wednesday 13 January 2016 09:38:12 Steve Matzura wrote:
>> And once again, I ask you to hand me the spatula so's I can scrape the
>> egg off my face. I completely forgot I needed to `mkdir -p' the mount
>> point directory! IT WORKS! Didn't I say
On Wednesday 13 January 2016 09:38:12 Steve Matzura wrote:
> And once again, I ask you to hand me the spatula so's I can scrape the
> egg off my face. I completely forgot I needed to `mkdir -p' the mount
> point directory! IT WORKS! Didn't I say I was missing something
> stupid? :-)
>
> Now to look
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 04:38:12AM -0500, Steve Matzura wrote:
> Now to look up the syntax for putting it into fstab to make it
> permanent. THANK YOU AGAIN EVER SO MUCH!
The syntax is
/olddir /newdir none bind
You must put this after the /olddir (/mnt/nas) and /newdir (/hom
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:01:03 +0300, you wrote:
>strace is used for tracing system calls, it does not influence your
>problem per se. Please install it first, run mount via strace second.
In between your message and now, my mount problem was solved, but I
installed strace anyway for future use. Th
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 23:49:02 -0500, you wrote:
>On 12/01/16 10:23 PM, Steve Matzura wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 18:12:11 -0300, Daniel wrote:
>>
>>> M... I used the following syntax:
>>>
>>> mount --bind /mnt/nas/doc /home/steve/doc
>>>
>>>
>>> That works for you?
>> Sorry ...
>>
>> mount: m
Hi.
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:30:03 -0500
Steve Matzura wrote:
> Reco:
>
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:21:19 +0300, you wrote:
>
> >Please post the output of:
> >
> >strace mount -B /mnt/nas/doc /home/steve/doc
>
> I *knew* I was missing something. I get 'command not found".
strace is used
On 12/01/16 10:41 PM, Steve Matzura wrote:
Gary:
I just tried something similar with an NFS share and was able to do it.
My situation was I have ///mnt mounted in ~/mnt. I was then
able to (as root) mount -o bind ./mnt/archives ./mnt1 while in my normal
~ folder.
You could also try mounting th
On 12/01/16 10:23 PM, Steve Matzura wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 18:12:11 -0300, Daniel wrote:
M... I used the following syntax:
mount --bind /mnt/nas/doc /home/steve/doc
That works for you?
Sorry ...
mount: mount point docs does not exist
That error would indicate that /home/steve/doc
Gary:
>I just tried something similar with an NFS share and was able to do it.
>My situation was I have ///mnt mounted in ~/mnt. I was then
>able to (as root) mount -o bind ./mnt/archives ./mnt1 while in my normal
>~ folder.
>
>You could also try mounting the share locally or sharing the "doc"
Reco:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:21:19 +0300, you wrote:
>Please post the output of:
>
>strace mount -B /mnt/nas/doc /home/steve/doc
I *knew* I was missing something. I get 'command not found".
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:56:28 +0100, you wrote:
>Le 12/01/2016 22:12, Daniel Bareiro a écrit :
>
>> mount --bind /mnt/nas/doc /home/steve/doc
>>
>>
>> That works for you?
>
>I use such syntax failry often
>
>jdd
Even on a virtual filesystem like a Windows share or NAS volume? Am I
maybe missing a
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 18:12:11 -0300, Daniel wrote:
>M... I used the following syntax:
>
>mount --bind /mnt/nas/doc /home/steve/doc
>
>
>That works for you?
Sorry ...
mount: mount point docs does not exist
p /mnt/nas
# mount.cifs //ds1/vol1 /mnt/nas -o [various options]
When I 'ls -l /mnt/nas', I see all the directories at the top level of
//ds1/vol1. Fine.
Now, according to everything I've read about bind mount, I should be
able to:
# mount -o bind /mnt/nas/doc /home/steve/doc
where `do
Le 12/01/2016 22:12, Daniel Bareiro a écrit :
mount --bind /mnt/nas/doc /home/steve/doc
That works for you?
I use such syntax failry often
jdd
rooted
> elsewhere, thus:
>
> # mkdir -p /mnt/nas
> # mount.cifs //ds1/vol1 /mnt/nas -o [various options]
>
> When I 'ls -l /mnt/nas', I see all the directories at the top level of
> //ds1/vol1. Fine.
>
> Now, according to everything I've read about bin
On 12/01/16 18:12, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Now I see why I used mount with bind instead of hard links as saying in
> a previous email :)
I'm sorry. I meant to symlinks.
Best regards,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
vol1. Fine.
Good.
> Now, according to everything I've read about bind mount, I should be
> able to:
>
> # mount -o bind /mnt/nas/doc /home/steve/doc
>
> where `doc' is a directory on /mnt/nas as described above, and
> `/home/steve/doc' is where I want it to app
us options]
When I 'ls -l /mnt/nas', I see all the directories at the top level of
//ds1/vol1. Fine.
Now, according to everything I've read about bind mount, I should be
able to:
# mount -o bind /mnt/nas/doc /home/steve/doc
where `doc' is a directory on /mnt/nas as describ
s a
> solution?
Oops; sorry. An ext filesystem allows a link. A FAT f.s. doesn't but a
directory
where the target is bind mounted is a useable substitute. Inconvenient
that the bind mount requires root.
Regards, ... Peter E.
--
123456789 1234567
s a
> solution?
Oops; sorry. An ext filesystem allows a link. A FAT f.s. doesn't but a
directory
where the target is bind mounted is a useable substitute. Inconvenient
that the bind mount requires root.
Regards, ... Peter E.
--
123456789 1234567
From: Andrei POPESCU
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 22:51:47 +0200
> What are you trying to accomplish?
Mount a directory on a directory. Scroll down to "--bind".
http://linux.die.net/man/8/mount
Seems odd that ordinary mounts are available to users but "bind" is
only for root.
Thanks,
On 12/23/2014 at 11:38 AM, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> From: Andrei POPESCU Date: Mon, 22 Dec
> 2014 22:51:47 +0200
>> What are you trying to accomplish?
>
> Mount a directory on a directory. Scroll down to "--bind".
> http://linux.die.net/man/8/mount
I think what Andrei meant is asking what y
On Lu, 22 dec 14, 11:03:07, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> This line in /etc/fstab allows bind mounting, except that
> the user option has no effect.
> /usr/bin/aos /home/usr/.aoshome none bind,user
>
> There is no simple way to allow a user?
What are you trying to accomplish?
Kind regards,
Andrei
This line in /etc/fstab allows bind mounting, except that
the user option has no effect.
/usr/bin/aos /home/usr/.aoshome none bind,user
There is no simple way to allow a user?
Thanks,... Peter E.
--
123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12
Tel
only way.
Yes, I am trying to change the default permissions of *newly
created* files. That is why I tried umask, but it doesn't work
with a bind mount.
> You would have to change the original mount point options in
> order to do this. The directory would need to be on its own
t I cannot change the umask when mounting
> with --bind.
Correct.
> Any ideas on how to achieve my goal?
You would have to change the original mount point options in order to
do this. The directory would need to be on its own filesystem. You
could create a filesystem specific for this purpo
I tried mounting a directory like so:
mount --bind -o umask=0117 /home/files /home/glen/files
What I am shooting for, is that all files created in
/home/glen/files will have the permissions 660. But the above
command seems to have no effect on permissions of created files.
I have also tried
37 matches
Mail list logo
