Re: bind worm

2001-03-24 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 06:17:07PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote: I do run unstable, but apt-cache show bind reports this (irrelevant parts snipped): Package: bind Version: 1:8.2.3-4 Package: bind Version: 1:8.2.3-0.potato.1 Right - 1:8.2.3-4 is available from the main stable archive and

bind worm

2001-03-23 Thread John Cuson
forwarded sans alert ... john cuson ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast. Alice, in Alice In

Re: bind worm

2001-03-23 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 12:53:59PM -0500, John Cuson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: forwarded sans alert ... john cuson ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast. Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:39:47 -0700 (MST)

Re: bind worm

2001-03-23 Thread Bill White
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 02:23:16PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote: on Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 12:53:59PM -0500, John Cuson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: forwarded sans alert ... john cuson ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible

Re: bind worm

2001-03-23 Thread Bill White
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:39:14PM -0500, Bill White wrote: This is very confusing to me. It looks to me as if the version of bind in stable is 8.2.2p7-1. It looks to me as if you have to go to unstable to get 8.2.3-4. So, when you say we should run our updates, does that means we should

Re: bind worm

2001-03-23 Thread Hall Stevenson
* Bill White ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010323 17:45]: Note that Package: bind Version: 1:8.2.3-4 This is very confusing to me. It looks to me as if the version of bind in stable is 8.2.2p7-1. It looks to me as if you have to go to unstable to get 8.2.3-4. So, when you say

Re: bind worm

2001-03-23 Thread Erik Steffl
Bill White wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 02:23:16PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote: on Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 12:53:59PM -0500, John Cuson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: forwarded sans alert ... john cuson ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Why, sometimes I've believed as

Re: bind worm

2001-03-23 Thread Bill White
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 03:20:49PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote: Bill White wrote: you might want to check the archives of security but AFAIK the security problems are released for potato as well. So I guess if it was fixed in testing/unstable it was also fixed in stable... Well, actually I

security.debian.org in sources.list (was Re: bind worm)

2001-03-23 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 06:13:27PM -0500, Bill White ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:39:14PM -0500, Bill White wrote: This is very confusing to me. It looks to me as if the version of bind in stable is 8.2.2p7-1. It looks to me as if you have to go to unstable to