On 6/14/23 04:22, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 09:08:05PM +0200, CL wrote:
I use Brave as browser and want to set here the dark mode.
But it seems that Brave doesn't remember the setting. After every switch off
/ switch on of the system the browser forget the dark setting.
* On 2023 14 Jun 03:24 -0500, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-06-13 13:41:23 -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > I have always chickened out on that option. Looking at the ucf man page
> > and the description of the three-way merge it looks like the user would
> > have a yes or no option but no edit
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:32:51 +0200
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-06-12 18:00:58 +0100, Joe wrote:
> > Yes. I run a fairly customised exim4, and during one upgrade, I
> > think either to or from etch, I kept my configuration, and it broke
> > the exim4 installation. Exim4 was unconfigured, so
On 2023-06-13 13:41:23 -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> I have always chickened out on that option. Looking at the ucf man page
> and the description of the three-way merge it looks like the user would
> have a yes or no option but no edit option.
One can always run an editor from a shell.
--
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 09:08:05PM +0200, CL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after two days usage I found a little issue.
>
> I use Brave as browser and want to set here the dark mode.
>
> But it seems that Brave doesn't remember the setting. After every switch off
> / switch on of the system the browser
Hello,
after two days usage I found a little issue.
I use Brave as browser and want to set here the dark mode.
But it seems that Brave doesn't remember the setting. After every switch
off / switch on of the system the browser forget the dark setting.
Not a big issue but a little bit
Hello,
Docker might be different. I don't use it yet - Not enough knowledge and
a little bit afraid ;-)
I use a direct installation. Therfore this issue.
But as I already said no problem after the "downgrade".
---
mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
**Christian Lorenz**
* On 2023 13 Jun 10:01 -0500, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-06-13 06:41:41 -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > I've been experimenting with Arch Linux for some time and one thing I
> > like about its pacman package management system is that it has a tool
> > available named 'pacdiff'. The details
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:46:36 +0200
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-06-12 13:33:02 -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > Often, but apparently not always. For example, on one of my upgrades,
> > the old sshd_config had:
> >
> > **
> > # Change to yes to enable challenge-response passwords (beware
On 2023-06-13 06:41:41 -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> I've been experimenting with Arch Linux for some time and one thing I
> like about its pacman package management system is that it has a tool
> available named 'pacdiff'. The details are off topic but in a nutshell
> what it does is identify a
On 2023-06-12 13:33:02 -0400, Celejar wrote:
> Often, but apparently not always. For example, on one of my upgrades,
> the old sshd_config had:
>
> **
> # Change to yes to enable challenge-response passwords (beware issues with
> # some PAM modules and threads)
>
On 2023-06-12 18:00:58 +0100, Joe wrote:
> Yes. I run a fairly customised exim4, and during one upgrade, I think
> either to or from etch, I kept my configuration, and it broke the exim4
> installation. Exim4 was unconfigured, so it wouldn't run, but
> dpkg-reconfigure couldn't work either. Even a
* On 2023 12 Jun 07:51 -0500, Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 12:31:31 -0400
> Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Everything's working. In the end, I didn't make any config
> > changes (left everything as "keep current config").
>
> This is the part that always stresses me out; I often have changes in
>
On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 21:05:32 +0200
CL wrote:
...
> Only topic was the restart of the Nextcloud. They don't wanted the
> standard PHP 8.2.
> Solution was a downgrade to PHP8.0
That's unusual - Debian Stable having too *recent* software :|
FWIW, I upgraded my Debian Stable Nextcloud (26.02
On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 18:02:13 +0100
Brian wrote:
> On Mon 12 Jun 2023 at 08:50:54 -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 12:31:31 -0400
> > Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > The machine I am typing on has been upgraded from bullseye to
> > > bookworm. TL;DR: boring, which is good.
>
On Mon 12 Jun 2023 at 08:50:54 -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 12:31:31 -0400
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> >
> > The machine I am typing on has been upgraded from bullseye to
> > bookworm. TL;DR: boring, which is good.
>
> ...
>
> > I read the release notes.
> >
> > Changed
On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:50:54 -0400
Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 12:31:31 -0400
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> >
> > The machine I am typing on has been upgraded from bullseye to
> > bookworm. TL;DR: boring, which is good.
>
> ...
>
> > I read the release notes.
> >
> > Changed
On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:50:54 -0400
Celejar wrote:
> This is the part that always stresses me out; I often have changes in
> the default config files that I don't want to lose, but I'm also
> worried about not getting the latest versions of the config files. I
> usually try to accept the new
On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 12:31:31 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> The machine I am typing on has been upgraded from bullseye to
> bookworm. TL;DR: boring, which is good.
...
> I read the release notes.
>
> Changed sources.list entries.
>
> Ran apt update.
>
> I ran apt upgrade --without-new-pkgs
Hello,
can confirm the statement of Dan.
Just did an upgrade Bullseye -> Bookworm at two computer.
1. Lenovo V340-17IWL
XFCE Desktop
used as daily driver
2. NUC Kit DC53427HYE
XFCE Desktop
but used as server for a Nextcloud instance
general connetion via ssh
Both upgrades run smoothly
The machine I am typing on has been upgraded from bullseye to
bookworm. TL;DR: boring, which is good.
Hardware:
AMD 5 3600 (6c12t)
32 GB RAM
one NVMe SSD, ext4
MSI MS-7C95 B550M PRO-VDH WIFI motherboard
Peripherals:
Blue Yeti microphone
X-Bows KNIGHT keyboard
Logitech C920 webcam
Logitech
21 matches
Mail list logo
