On 11 April 2011 09:31, Enno Gröper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 11.04.2011 09:55, schrieb Frank Van Damme:
>> 2011/4/7 Carlos Miranda Molina (Mstaaravin) :
>>>
>>> http://www.redmine.org/
>>>
>>> Integrate issues, wiki, etc.
>>
>> Very practical piece of software indeed, I have also used Trac which
>> has
Hi,
Am 11.04.2011 09:55, schrieb Frank Van Damme:
> 2011/4/7 Carlos Miranda Molina (Mstaaravin) :
>>
>> http://www.redmine.org/
>>
>> Integrate issues, wiki, etc.
>
> Very practical piece of software indeed, I have also used Trac which
> has more or less the same basic set of features (integratio
2011/4/7 Carlos Miranda Molina (Mstaaravin) :
>
> http://www.redmine.org/
>
> Integrate issues, wiki, etc.
Very practical piece of software indeed, I have also used Trac which
has more or less the same basic set of features (integration
bugtracking-wiki-project management etc) and I consider Trac
On 7 April 2011 21:06, Carlos Miranda Molina (Mstaaravin)
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Jason Hsu wrote:
>> I need a bug tracking system for Swift Linux (www.swiftlinux.org).
I submit that this is somewhat OT for debian-user and should be marked
as such or discussed
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Carlos Miranda Molina (Mstaaravin)
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Jason Hsu wrote:
>> I need a bug tracking system for Swift Linux (www.swiftlinux.org).
>>
>> I have no prior experience with bug tracking systems, so I have NO idea
On 04/07/2011 02:20 PM, Jason Hsu wrote:
> I need a bug tracking system for Swift Linux (www.swiftlinux.org).
>
> I have no prior experience with bug tracking systems, so I have NO idea what
> to look for. What do you like and dislike about the various bug tracking
> systems?
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Jason Hsu wrote:
> I need a bug tracking system for Swift Linux (www.swiftlinux.org).
>
> I have no prior experience with bug tracking systems, so I have NO idea what
> to look for. What do you like and dislike about the various bug tracking
>
I need a bug tracking system for Swift Linux (www.swiftlinux.org).
I have no prior experience with bug tracking systems, so I have NO idea what to
look for. What do you like and dislike about the various bug tracking systems?
I'd especially like to hear your opinions on Bugzilla (us
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:30:22 +0100
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2010-02-24 09:00:40, schrieb Celejar:
> > and I've never heard of the problems you claim. Can you provide bug
> > reports? Corroborating documentation?
>
> For what? Nobody is interested into! And if you think, I use this crap
>
ow's something going to change when you don;t tell about your
problems?
In previous posts you also claim that mysql is insecure. Sure when using
myisam tables mysql is not acid compliant (is that important for a bug
tracking system?) However, you can choose to use innodb and then it is.
Wha
Am 2010-02-24 09:00:40, schrieb Celejar:
> and I've never heard of the problems you claim. Can you provide bug
> reports? Corroborating documentation?
For what? Nobody is interested into! And if you think, I use this crap
of Mozilla-Forum to post bugs, forget it. Reporting bugs per web is the
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:58:28 +0100
Michelle Konzack wrote:
...
> If sqlite crashs, you have to reconstruct the database by hand.
>
> Firefox is using SQlite and if I do no backup the whole Firefox
> directory a least two times a day I would be fucked 2-3 times a week by
> crashes of F
Hello Jon,
Am 2010-02-24 10:18:28, schrieb Jon Dowland:
> I would have suggested roundup-tracker, right up to
>
> > 3) Without Database like pgsql, mysql or sqlite
>
> That really kills all your options right there.
If I use my servers at hoem, it would be no problem, but I am ongoing to
move
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 03:31:48PM +0100, Michelle Konzack
wrote:
> I am searching for a small Bug Tracking System like the
> Debian BTS, but more lite. I need exactly
snip
I would have suggested roundup-tracker, right up to
> 3) Without Database like pgsql, mysql or sqlite
That rea
Hello Geeks,
I am searching for a small Bug Tracking System like the Debian BTS, but
more lite. I need exactly
1) must work with a catchall mailaccount
2a) must work with courier-mta using the dot-courier like curier-mlm
or
2b) integration into procmail with a .courier-default and
NN_il_Confusionario on 14/04/08 11:55, wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:27:02AM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
NN_il_Confusionario on 13/04/08 17:11, wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 01:16:37PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402
Tags: moreinfo;
I don't
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:27:02AM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> NN_il_Confusionario on 13/04/08 17:11, wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 01:16:37PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> >>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402
> > Tags: moreinfo;
> I don't see how you know this person is the m
Sven Joachim on 14/04/08 10:51, wrote:
On 2008-04-14 11:19 +0200, Adam Hardy wrote:
Paul Johnson on 13/04/08 18:43, wrote:
On Sunday 13 April 2008 05:16:37 am Adam Hardy wrote:
How do I do that - where do I look?
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That gives me the following reply:
<[EMAIL PROTEC
On 2008-04-14 11:19 +0200, Adam Hardy wrote:
> Paul Johnson on 13/04/08 18:43, wrote:
>> On Sunday 13 April 2008 05:16:37 am Adam Hardy wrote:
>>
>>> How do I do that - where do I look?
>>
>> Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
> That gives me the following reply:
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> SMTP error
NN_il_Confusionario on 13/04/08 17:11, wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 01:16:37PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402
From that page:
Tags: moreinfo;
[snip]
Works for me.
[snip]
Of course, if we *do* find out which package is at fault w
Paul Johnson on 13/04/08 18:43, wrote:
On Sunday 13 April 2008 05:16:37 am Adam Hardy wrote:
How do I do that - where do I look?
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That gives me the following reply:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SMTP error from remote server after RCPT command:
host bugs.debian.org[140.211
On Sunday 13 April 2008 05:16:37 am Adam Hardy wrote:
> How do I do that - where do I look?
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Adam Hardy wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402
>
> I can do bugreport emails, but I really would like to find out more about
> this bug in openoffice, mainly whether it's fixed.
>
> How do I do that - where do I look?
Look at the picture on the right hand side which
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 01:16:37PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402
>From that page:
Tags: moreinfo;
[snip]
Works for me.
[snip]
Of course, if we *do* find out which package is at fault we should fix
OOos dependencies, but...
Which m
At this moment I have one big blind spot regarding debian, and that is the
system for bugs.
For instance, I'm trying to work out what the situation is with a bug in
openoffice.org-calc:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464402
Now I'm laboring under the Java-dev
Our virus checker has found potentially malicious code in a mail from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) addressed to you. Delivery has been
stopped. For further
questions, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message has been quarantined as 4048f1a7-7a53.
CLAM Anti Virus found
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:56:58PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 02:06:25AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > I've now received the acknowledgement.
>
> In my case, the bugs didn't show up when I looked for bug reports on
> the package.
Oh, yes, the package indexes were bust
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:56:58PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 02:06:25AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2003-12-04 06:03:33 +0900, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > Yes, at least partially. But I have the same problem as you: I didn't
> > > receive the acknowledgments, tho
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 02:06:25AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2003-12-04 06:03:33 +0900, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Yes, at least partially. But I have the same problem as you: I didn't
> > receive the acknowledgments, though I've just seen that they were
> > sent, e.g. on
> >
> > http:/
On 2003-12-04 06:03:33 +0900, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Yes, at least partially. But I have the same problem as you: I didn't
> receive the acknowledgments, though I've just seen that they were
> sent, e.g. on
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=222530&msg=2
>
> for one of my bu
On 2003-12-02 17:05:21 -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I submitted a couple of bugs days ago (Nov 29) and never got a
> confirmation. I figured the BTS was down because of the breach, but
> the latest DWN doesn't mention it.
>
> Is the BTS working at the moment?
Yes, at least partially. But I have t
I submitted a couple of bugs days ago (Nov 29) and never got a
confirmation. I figured the BTS was down because of the breach, but
the latest DWN doesn't mention it.
Is the BTS working at the moment?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
[trivial
> > hack] before you get it to work".
>
> If it is such a trivial hack to fix it, why didn't you submit
> the fix to the debian bug tracking system and to the upstream
> project maintainers (if you think it's a problem with the
> project rather than th
ts
> "Yyyou moron, that's a feature not a bug!" I might still
> continuing recommending the package, but I'd qualify the
> recommendation with "You need to do this [trivial hack] before
> you get it to work".
If it is such a trivial hack to fix it, why didn&#x
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 08:29:42AM +0800, csj wrote:
> At Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:18:39 +0100,
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > That's entirely up to the maintainer of the package and/or any
> > other random people who happen to look at it. Forget policy
> > here, it's a matter of people having time and inter
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 08:29:42AM +0800, csj wrote:
> At Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:18:39 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> >
> > That's entirely up to the maintainer of the package and/or any
> > other random people who happen to look at it. Forget policy
> > here, it's a matter of people having time and in
At Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:18:39 +0100,
Colin Watson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 04:02:11PM +0800, csj wrote:
> > I'm just curious about Debian's "bug" policy.
> >
> > I know that some bugs aren't fixable (because either they're
> > too expensive to fix or upstream thinks they're a "feature").
At Fri, 12 Sep 2003 20:38:20 -0400,
Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 04:02, csj wrote:
> > I'm just curious about Debian's "bug" policy.
> >
> > I know that some bugs aren't fixable (because either they're
> > too expensive to fix or upstream thinks they're a "feature").
> >
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 04:02, csj wrote:
> I'm just curious about Debian's "bug" policy.
>
> I know that some bugs aren't fixable (because either they're too
> expensive to fix or upstream thinks they're a "feature"). But
> how are bug reports resolved in the Debian bug system? I just
> checked m
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 04:02:11PM +0800, csj wrote:
> I'm just curious about Debian's "bug" policy.
>
> I know that some bugs aren't fixable (because either they're too
> expensive to fix or upstream thinks they're a "feature"). But
> how are bug reports resolved in the Debian bug system? I jus
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 04:02:11PM +0800, csj wrote:
> I'm just curious about Debian's "bug" policy.
>
> I know that some bugs aren't fixable (because either they're too
> expensive to fix or upstream thinks they're a "feature"). But
> how are bug reports resolved in the Debian bug system? I jus
I'm just curious about Debian's "bug" policy.
I know that some bugs aren't fixable (because either they're too
expensive to fix or upstream thinks they're a "feature"). But
how are bug reports resolved in the Debian bug system? I just
checked my favorite bug, and it's still under the heading
"ou
Richard Hector said:
> Other unixes seem to manage to dump to the swap partition - is there some
> significant difference that make this impractical/more dangerous for
> Linux?
even better, I've had my solaris boxes able to panic and dump their
"oops" messages to a syslog server before rebooting!
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 22:17, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 03:03:59PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 21:36, Rob Weir wrote:
> > >
> > > When the kernel crashes, there's no way for it to be able to know that
> > > it's state is consistent. Because of this, it's
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 03:03:59PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 21:36, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> > When the kernel crashes, there's no way for it to be able to know that
> > it's state is consistent. Because of this, it's not safe for it to try
> > to write to disks (since it
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 21:36, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> When the kernel crashes, there's no way for it to be able to know that
> it's state is consistent. Because of this, it's not safe for it to try
> to write to disks (since it could easily destroy everything on the
> disks).
>
> The best it can mana
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:17:41PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
^^^
Maybe you could have something
a little more friendly as your
Hi,
I have an issue that I believe is at the kernel module level (K 2.4.18,
module opl3sa2). I compiled the kernel with debugging enabled
. When the kernel freezes I get no "core" file and
can't seem to get anything from /var/log/daemon.log, kern.log, or
messages. What can I do to get furth
this?
>
> AC
>
I see that someone else has reported this today to bug tracking.
AC
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|| http://www.acampbell.org.uk
using Linux GNU/Debian || for book reviews, electronic
Windows-free zone || books and skeptical articles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 08:45:13PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Let's say I saw some behavior in one of programs, namely XMMS, and
> wanted to file a bug. Trying to not overload our hardworking maintainers,
> I dutifully first checked with bugview xmms to see if someone had
> already filed a bug
Hello all,
Let's say I saw some behavior in one of programs, namely XMMS, and
wanted to file a bug. Trying to not overload our hardworking maintainers,
I dutifully first checked with bugview xmms to see if someone had
already filed a bug on this behavior. It turns out that someone in
fact has.
on Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:54:37PM +0100, Josef Dalcolmo ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I know I am supposed to check first if a bug has already been
> registered, before submitting a new message. But how does one do that,
> if one cannot search the bug reports by content? I cannot know the
> number
%% Josef Dalcolmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jd> I know I am supposed to check first if a bug has already been
jd> registered, before submitting a new message. But how does one do
jd> that, if one cannot search the bug reports by content? I cannot
jd> know the number, or author of a bug r
I know I am supposed to check first if a bug has already been
registered, before submitting a new message. But how does one do that,
if one cannot search the bug reports by content? I cannot know the
number, or author of a bug report, if I know only the symptoms.
Best regards --
Josef Dalcolmo
Dear Wayne!
Now conclusions are fine :-)
I'd appreciate information on how your class is doing in
buglist-review project sometime.
My former reply was btw not addressed to you alone/primarily
but to users / maybe-users of debian in general. I'd think
statements on debian philosophy help understa
Subject: Re: Q: on Debian Bug-Tracking system
Date: Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 11:42:28AM +0200
In reply to:Bernd Worsch
Quoting Bernd Worsch([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 02:25:36PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> > Would someone know if the bugs listed on d
Subject: Re: Q: on Debian Bug-Tracking system
Date: Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 11:38:40AM +0900
In reply to:Olaf Meeuwissen
Quoting Olaf Meeuwissen([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Would someone know if the bugs listed on debia
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 02:25:36PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> Would someone know if the bugs listed on debian.org/Bugs
> are the 'current' outstanding bugs or just of all the bugs ever
> posted?
>
> In working up a course outline for an up-coming class, I found
> a bunch of 'inconsistencies' i
Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would someone know if the bugs listed on debian.org/Bugs are the
> 'current' outstanding bugs or just of all the bugs ever posted?
It lists the all the bugs filed that the maintainer has not yet
closed, which is likely someway between current outstanding
Would someone know if the bugs listed on debian.org/Bugs
are the 'current' outstanding bugs or just of all the bugs ever
posted?
In working up a course outline for an up-coming class, I found
a bunch of 'inconsistencies' in the doc packages (doc-base, dhelp,
dwww). I decides to report them an
Since I've reported a bug myself I've looked a little bit throught the
Bug Tracking System. In my view the list of bugs is much to large.
Something has to be done to get rid of bugs, especially old ones. So I
suggest the following:
1. Anyone who ever reported a bug should check i
Anyone know if the bug-tracking system is having problems? I submitted
a bug report on xserver-3dlabs (from potato) on Sunday, and it still
doesn't appear to have been registered. I don't seem to be having any
problems with my email, and I haven't received any delivery-failure
no
On Sun, Jan 18, 1998 at 06:34:41PM +0059, Toens Bueker wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 06:51:24PM -0800, Obi wrote:
> > does anyone know of a good bug-tracking software?
>
> Have you had a look at 'jitterbug'? Its from Andrew Tridgell - the father
> of samba ..
On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 06:51:24PM -0800, Obi wrote:
> does anyone know of a good bug-tracking software?
Have you had a look at 'jitterbug'? Its from Andrew
Tridgell - the father of samba ...
By
Töns
--
_o)
/\\ pgp fingerprint: 9B AC A5 CB C8 CC FC DC 25 B5 26 9A 5D 28 C0 3D
On 11 Jan, Obi wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> does anyone know of a good bug-tracking software?
>
Yes, I remember having seen Ian Jackson announce on packaging his DBTS
(Debian Bug Tracking System) which is the one debian use at
bugs.debian.org, but at this moment I'm not able t
Hi all,
does anyone know of a good bug-tracking software?
thanks,
graziano
--
Nessuna cosa è che più c'inganni che 'l nostro giudizio. Leonardo da Vinci
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
On Apr 12, Francesco Tapparo wrote
> Hi all,
> I have a proble with the Debian bug tracking system.
> I have found a minor bugs in some packages, and I have used "bug" to
> report the error. But I have not received the automatical answer from the
> bug tracking system.
Hi all,
I have a proble with the Debian bug tracking system.
I have found a minor bugs in some packages, and I have used "bug" to
report the error. But I have not received the automatical answer from the
bug tracking system. I like to know what's is wrong, and if the message has
68 matches
Mail list logo
