On Wed 25 Jun 2014 at 10:41:24 -0400, Doug wrote:
> On 06/25/2014 03:55 AM, Curt wrote:
> >On 2014-06-24, Brian wrote:
> >>Yes?
> >No.
>
> Most interesting message on the list:
If only such penetrating insight was applied to other posts this list
would be transformed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 2014-06-25, Doug wrote:
> Most interesting message on the list:
>
> On 06/25/2014 03:55 AM, Curt wrote:
>> On 2014-06-24, Brian wrote:
>>> Yes?
>> No.
>>
This business is well ended.
My liege and madam, to expostulate
What majesty should be, what duty is,
Why day is day, night night, and
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:41:24 -0400
Doug wrote:
> Most interesting message on the list:
>
> On 06/25/2014 03:55 AM, Curt wrote:
> > On 2014-06-24, Brian wrote:
> >> Yes?
> > No.
May be.
--
He: "If I made love to you, would you yell?"
She:"What do you want me to yell?"
-- Benny Hill
Most interesting message on the list:
On 06/25/2014 03:55 AM, Curt wrote:
On 2014-06-24, Brian wrote:
Yes?
No.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.or
On 2014-06-24, Brian wrote:
>
> Yes?
No.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnlql03m.2cv.cu...@einstein.electron.org
On Tue 24 Jun 2014 at 15:56:48 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2014-06-24, Doug wrote:
> > On 06/24/2014 05:46 AM, Curt wrote:
> >> On 2014-06-24, Darac Marjal wrote:
> >>> Are you saying that rootkits don't exist on "modern" Linux?
> >>>
> >> I believe he's saying chrootkit is unlikely to find one.
> >
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:09:50 +0100
Tom Furie wrote:
> To be fair, I think it would be far easier to detect a pink
> elephant at the bottom of your garden (or anywhere else, for that
> matter) than a rootkit, with or without specialist equipment. :)
I wouldn't be so categorical 'cos there's signi
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 05:33:38PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> I'll add that I generally resist buying devices to detect pink elephants
> at the the bottom of my garden. But not because I don't think elephants
> don't exist.
To be fair, I think it would be far easier to detect a pink elephant at
the bo
Op Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:03:30 +0200 schreef François Patte
:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I get this alert message (concerning lightdm) from chkrootkit
! RUID PID TTYCMD
! root 3153 tty7 /usr/bin/X :0 -seat seat0 -auth
/var/run/lightdm/root/:0
On Tue 24 Jun 2014 at 11:08:49 -0400, Doug wrote:
> On 06/24/2014 05:46 AM, Curt wrote:
> >On 2014-06-24, Darac Marjal wrote:
> >>Are you saying that rootkits don't exist on "modern" Linux?
> >>
> >I believe he's saying chrootkit is unlikely to find one.
> >
> >
> That begs the question. Is it un
On 2014-06-24, Doug wrote:
> On 06/24/2014 05:46 AM, Curt wrote:
>> On 2014-06-24, Darac Marjal wrote:
>>> Are you saying that rootkits don't exist on "modern" Linux?
>>>
>> I believe he's saying chrootkit is unlikely to find one.
>>
>>
> That begs the question. Is it unlikely to find one because
On 06/24/2014 05:46 AM, Curt wrote:
On 2014-06-24, Darac Marjal wrote:
Are you saying that rootkits don't exist on "modern" Linux?
I believe he's saying chrootkit is unlikely to find one.
That begs the question. Is it unlikely to find one because nobody tries
to implement a rootkit on Linu
On Tue 24 Jun 2014 at 09:46:04 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2014-06-24, Darac Marjal wrote:
> >
> > Are you saying that rootkits don't exist on "modern" Linux?
> >
>
> I believe he's saying chrootkit is unlikely to find one.
Close.
If I, in my guise as a medical doctor, insisted on inoculating you
On 2014-06-24, Darac Marjal wrote:
>
> Are you saying that rootkits don't exist on "modern" Linux?
>
I believe he's saying chrootkit is unlikely to find one.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 07:28:15PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 23 Jun 2014 at 19:56:15 +0400, Reco wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:03:30AM +0200, François Patte wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Bonjour,
> > >
> > > I get this alert message (co
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 07:28:15PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> There is no well-documented case of chrootkit ever giving a true
> positive; false positives are its stock in trade. What do you expect of
> a program which searches for things which do not exist or which have no
> relevance (if they ever had
On Mon 23 Jun 2014 at 19:56:15 +0400, Reco wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:03:30AM +0200, François Patte wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Bonjour,
> >
> > I get this alert message (concerning lightdm) from chkrootkit
> >
> > ! RUID PID TTYCMD
Hi.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:03:30AM +0200, François Patte wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bonjour,
>
> I get this alert message (concerning lightdm) from chkrootkit
>
> ! RUID PID TTYCMD
> ! root 3153 tty7 /usr/bin/X :0 -seat seat0 -auth
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I get this alert message (concerning lightdm) from chkrootkit
! RUID PID TTYCMD
! root 3153 tty7 /usr/bin/X :0 -seat seat0 -auth
/var/run/lightdm/root/:0 -nolisten tcp vt7 -novtswitch
What does it mean?
- --
Françoi
19 matches
Mail list logo
