Le 24/08/2022 à 18:21, Gabriel Moreau a écrit :
À ma connaissance, sous Linux, le chmod u+s sur un dossier ne sers à
rien ! Ce qui sers sur un dossier est
chmod g+s
chmod o+t
Le premier affecte tout nouveau fichier au groupe du dossier (pratique
dans un partage puisque les personnes ne
Le 24/08/2022 à 18:12, Gabriel Moreau a écrit :
Cela ne fonctionne que pour les exécutables binaires. Cela ne
fonctionne pas pour les scripts. C'est une sécurité car un script est
trop facilement modifiable.
C'est la raison pour laquelle il y avait il y a longtemps perlsuid...
et ainsi de
Sauf que je ne comprends pas ce que ça implique sur un dossier, en tout
cas je n'arrive pas à appliquer ça pour m'en rendre compte.
À ma connaissance, sous Linux, le chmod u+s sur un dossier ne sers à
rien ! Ce qui sers sur un dossier est
chmod g+s
chmod o+t
Le premier affecte tout
- Dans le cas d'un fichier, peut-être qu'un script bash ne permet pas
d'appliquer mais changer son propriétaire et le chmod u+s ne m'a pas
permis d'avoir les droits de l'utilisateur propriétaire.
Cela ne fonctionne que pour les exécutables binaires. Cela ne fonctionne
pas pour les scripts
Merci à tous pour vos réponses.
J'ai bien lu, en tout cas la page man de chmod.
Sauf que je ne comprends pas ce que ça implique sur un dossier, en tout
cas je n'arrive pas à appliquer ça pour m'en rendre compte.
Pire encore, je n'arrive même pas à appliquer ça pour un fichier.
Du coup, en
(\_))
`-'(. .)`-'
\_/
From: Patrick ZAJDA
Sent: mercredi 24 août 2022 15:10
To: Debian user french
Subject: chmod u+s
Hello, Quelqu'un pourrait-il, en des mots simple, m'expliquer à quoi sert le
mode s pour un dossier ? Je le remarque entre autre sur le dossier download de
transmission-remote
/linux/man-pages/man7/inode.7.html
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/chmod.1.html
C'est en effet un bon réflexe de commencer par lire par lire la page du
manuel...
J'en profite pour signaler que depuis 2020, l'équipe de traduction en
français de Debian s'investit avec une forte intensité pour
Bonjour,
Le 24/08/2022 à 16:43, Belaïd a écrit :
Bonjour,
Il me semble que c'est le sticky bit (chmod +t) qui fait ce que tu as
expliqué et non u+s
Le mer. 24 août 2022 à 16:35, Sébastien NOBILI
<mailto:s-liste-debian-user-fre...@pipoprods.org>> a écrit :
Bonjour,
Le 2
/man1/chmod.1.html
et je cherche toujours des partenaires intéressés par RefPerSys
<http://refpersys.org/>.
Merci.
--
Basile Starynkevitch
(only mine opinions / les opinions sont miennes uniquement)
92340 Bourg-la-Reine, France
web page: starynkevitch.net/Basile/
Le 2022-08-24 16:43, Belaïd a écrit :
Il me semble que c'est le sticky bit (chmod +t) qui fait ce que tu as
expliqué et non u+s
En effet, confusion de ma part… "Sticky", "+t", "+s"…
Merci d'avoir relevé.
Sébastien
Bonjour,
Il me semble que c'est le sticky bit (chmod +t) qui fait ce que tu as
expliqué et non u+s
Le mer. 24 août 2022 à 16:35, Sébastien NOBILI <
s-liste-debian-user-fre...@pipoprods.org> a écrit :
> Bonjour,
>
> Le 2022-08-24 15:10, Patrick ZAJDA a écrit :
> > Quelqu'u
Bonjour,
Le 2022-08-24 15:10, Patrick ZAJDA a écrit :
Quelqu'un pourrait-il, en des mots simple, m'expliquer à quoi sert le
mode s pour un dossier ?
Ça interdit la suppression d'éléments du dossier par quiconque autre que
le propriétaire.
C'est également utilisé dans le dossier /tmp
Tout
sous-répertoires de
celui-ci appartiendraient au même propriétaire.
En faisant chmod g+s j'ai bien le comportement que je pense, à savoir
que le groupe est conservé même si c'est un autre utilisateur qui crée
un sous-répertoire et le mode g+s est également mis sur le répertoire créé.
Mais
On 2015-11-20 15:56 +0100, Decstasy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> since there is systemd some things have changed... Anyway I hope
> someone here can help me :)
>
> I want to change the default chmod of /dev/pts/* from 620 to 660.
Are you sure you want to this? Reasonable valu
Hello,
since there is systemd some things have changed... Anyway I hope someone
here can help me :)
I want to change the default chmod of /dev/pts/* from 620 to 660. In the
past it can be changed by /etc/defaults/devpts
But it does not work at all. I could not find any entry in /etc/fstab
Cheers Bob :)
Uuummm - work files yes, system configs/settings not really.
Any top tips, like where are the permission file/s?
On 12 June 2015 at 22:07, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Julian Brooks wrote:
All seems well, valuable lesson(s) learnt.
Seriously thought it was terminal,
Julian Brooks wrote:
All seems well, valuable lesson(s) learnt.
Seriously thought it was terminal, appreciate the wisdom people.
Glad to hear you solved your problem. In the future with a similar
problem you would be able to restore your current system permissions
from your backup. Not the
perhaps I wasn't clear
enough. For example I could run 'find' down the backup tree and print
the file modes of the files there.
cd /path/to/backup
find . -type l -prune -o -printf chmod %m %p\n
There are no whitespace in most files in /usr and therefore the above
would print out a series
Many thanks for the replies.
(I did say I'm sketchy here)
I was attempting to alter permissions on a folder.
I then read that all folders leding up to it must also have permission
altered.
So I then mistakenly actually ran
'sudo chmod -755 /usr/lib/TheFolderIMeantToAlter'
and all folders
Hey all,
Yes I'm an idiot...
Not very experienced user here - 1st post:
I mistakenly ran 'chmod -755 /usr'.
How can I fix my permissions?
Haven't rebooted yet, too scared. Currently getting around as root.
Would prefer to avoid reinstall if possible.
Cheers,
Julian
Julian Brooks jbee...@gmail.com writes:
Hey all,
Yes I'm an idiot...
Not very experienced user here - 1st post:
I mistakenly ran 'chmod -755 /usr'.
How can I fix my permissions?
Run 'chmod 755 /usr'.
All your command did was remove permissions from the /usr directory. Just
set them back
Helllo Julian,
Should just be to revert the change with 'chmod 755 /usr'.
On 10 June 2015 at 05:40, Julian Brooks jbee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
Yes I'm an idiot...
Not very experienced user here - 1st post:
I mistakenly ran 'chmod -755 /usr'.
How can I fix my permissions?
Haven't
Caros,
Tenho uma máquina aqui onde acidentalmente foi feito um
chmod -R 777 /var
e
chown -R 777 /var (isso mesmo. chown. fazer as coisas com presa é uma
merda. mas depois o cabra foi corrigindo)
eu fiz um ls -lR /var desta máquina e de outra máquina e comparei os
dois com o kdiff3, mas tem
escreveu:
Caros,
Tenho uma máquina aqui onde acidentalmente foi feito um
chmod -R 777 /var
e
chown -R 777 /var (isso mesmo. chown. fazer as coisas com presa é uma
merda. mas depois o cabra foi corrigindo)
eu fiz um ls -lR /var desta máquina e de outra máquina e comparei os
dois com o
. mas tem alguma diferença?
Fabiano
Enviado via iPhone
Em 10/12/2012, às 16:55, Fred Maranhão fred.maran...@gmail.com escreveu:
Caros,
Tenho uma máquina aqui onde acidentalmente foi feito um
chmod -R 777 /var
e
chown -R 777 /var (isso mesmo. chown. fazer as coisas com presa é uma
merda
:
Merhaba arkadaşlar
Bir nokta koymayı unuttum ve yanlışlıkla aşağıdaki komutu root olarak
çalıştırdım;
chmod -R 777 /*
Hata yaptıgımı ekranda birçok yazının hızlıca geçmesinden sonra
anladım ve komutu durdurdum. Tabii jetonun düşmesi biraz geç oldu.
Şimdi sudo yapınca şu hata çıkıyor;
y@debian:~$ sudo
yazdı:
Merhaba arkadaşlar
Bir nokta koymayı unuttum ve aşağıdaki komutu root olarak çalıştırdım;
chmod -R 777 /*
Hata yaptıgımı ekranda birçok yazının hızlıca geçmesinden sonra
anladım ve komutu durdurdum. Tabii jetonun düşmesi biraz geç oldu.
Şimdi sudo yapınca şu hata çıkıyor;
y@debian
yapabilirsin.
root olmak icinde acilista
single mode yada gruba parametre olarak init=/bin/bash
faydalanabilirsin.
Gecmis olsun.
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 05:24 AM, yalçın karagöz wrote:
Merhaba arkadaşlar
Bir nokta koymayı unuttum ve yanlışlıkla aşağıdaki komutu root olarak
çalıştırdım;
chmod
Hi.
I have got Ubuntu 11.04 installed on my pendrive. In /ME folder I have got
some files.bin to upgrade the BIOS an so.
The problem is that I can't execute them. It says I have no
permissions.These are 7001 (last number refers back to the sticky bit)
I'm trying to set 'sudo chmod 777 *', but I
Go to the parent directory. Run
sudo chmod -R 777 *
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Gorka gorkali...@yahoo.es wrote:
Hi.
I have got Ubuntu 11.04 installed on my pendrive. In /ME folder I have got
some files.bin to upgrade the BIOS an so.
The problem is that I can't execute them. It says I
Parent directory is /
Aparently it changes permissions to 777, but suddenly they turn into 7001
again. There is some kind of persistency. Chown works well, but chmod works so.
De: Kousik Maiti [mailto:kousiks...@gmail.com]
Enviado el: martes, 10 de mayo de 2011 13:17
Para: Gorka
CC
to set 'sudo chmod 777 *', but I can't.
What filesystem have you put on the pendrive?
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/tmqn98xii6
.
The problem is that I can't execute them. It says I have no
permissions.These are 7001 (last number refers back to the sticky bit)
I'm trying to set 'sudo chmod 777 *', but I can't.
What filesystem have you put on the pendrive?
Chris
I have formated with FAT32 and then followed these instructions
have
got some files.bin to upgrade the BIOS an so.
The problem is that I can't execute them. It says I have no
permissions.These are 7001 (last number refers back to the sticky bit)
I'm trying to set 'sudo chmod 777 *', but I can't.
What filesystem have you put on the pendrive?
Chris
On 05/10/2011 05:18 AM, Gorka wrote:
Parent directory is /
Aparently it changes permissions to 777, but suddenly they turn into
7001 again. There is some kind of persistency. Chown works well, but
chmod works so.
--deleted other suggestions for brevity--
Try creating a new
to set 'sudo chmod 777 *', but I can't.
Gorka gorkali...@yahoo.es wrote:
I have formated with FAT32 and then followed these instructions ...
http://www.ubuntu.com/download/ubuntu/download
There's nothing in there, that I can see, that refers to upgrading the BIOS.
The filesystem containing /ME
Em Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:51:43 -0200
gunix gustavo.gru...@gmail.com escreveu:
Porem se eu de uma maquina linux ou até mesmo no serivodr se eu
mandar criar um arquivo com o comando toutch e permissão não é dada
para o grupo. O grupo fica com direito apenas de leitura, sendo que
preciso que fique
Galera,
tenho um servidor de arquivos, com samba e NFS rodando.
Tenho um diretorio comum a um grupo de trabalho e com permissão, 770.
drwsrws--- 13 root G_TI 4096 Jan 11 23:33 public_ti
Setei o bit +s para que ao gravar o arquivo seja respeitado o grupo do
diretorio e nao o grupo
Alguém sabe de alguma forma para dar um chmod em uma lista de arquivos
resultante de um ls?
Queria fazer isso em linha de comando sem jogar o resultado do ls em
um arquivo temporário.
Abs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
Olá,
2009/4/16 Fernando Xavier fernando.xav...@gmail.com:
Alguém sabe de alguma forma para dar um chmod em uma lista de arquivos
resultante de um ls?
Não sei se funciona no seu caso mas você já deu uma olhada no xargs?
Queria fazer isso em linha de comando sem jogar o resultado do ls em
Perfeito! Era isso que precisava. Executei algo mais ou menos assim:
find diretorio -mtime -1 -type f -print | xargs chmod 755
Muito obrigado!
abs
2009/4/16 Gunther Furtado gunfurt...@gmail.com:
Olá,
2009/4/16 Fernando Xavier fernando.xav...@gmail.com:
Alguém sabe de alguma forma para dar
Em 16/4/2009 10:46, Fernando Xavier escreveu:
Alguém sabe de alguma forma para dar um chmod em uma lista de arquivos
resultante de um ls?
Queria fazer isso em linha de comando sem jogar o resultado do ls em
um arquivo temporário.
Abs
Você pode usar os coringas do shell se for algo
Ainda prefiro um jeito mais fácil:
chmod -vR 755 DIRETORIO
tudo que tiver dentro desse diretório vaireceber os parâmetros tb.
depois é só aplicar permissões especiais pra algumas pastas específicas
2009/4/16 Fernando Xavier fernando.xav...@gmail.com
Perfeito! Era isso que precisava
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 12:22:49AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
bretnewworkstation:~# ls -l /data
total 780
-rw-r--r-- 1 bret bret 382652 2009-04-03 00:03 *.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 bret bret 382652 2009-04-03 00:04 WonkyAcerWebPage_Iceape.jpg
That looks a bit suspicious.
--
Chris.
==
I contend that
I have created a new data partition for a Ubuntu/Debian dual boot
system, using gparted from the Debian 4 installation.
Now I have to figure out how to make the new data partition accessible.
chmod (from the Debian system) seems to be designed to frustrate.
it used to be that using a syntax
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 07:55:59PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
I have created a new data partition for a Ubuntu/Debian dual boot
system, using gparted from the Debian 4 installation.
[snip]
chmod 777 /data
I think when you use octects you have to prefix with 0 so try chmod 0777
/data
Bret Busby wrote:
I have created a new data partition for a Ubuntu/Debian dual boot
system, using gparted from the Debian 4 installation.
Now I have to figure out how to make the new data partition accessible.
chmod (from the Debian system) seems to be designed to frustrate.
it used
Bret Busby wrote:
I have created a new data partition for a Ubuntu/Debian dual boot
system, using gparted from the Debian 4 installation.
Now I have to figure out how to make the new data partition accessible.
chmod (from the Debian system) seems to be designed to frustrate.
it used
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Bret Busby b...@busby.net wrote:
I know that is how the syntax used to be, because I remember a person (on a
UNIX system) losing his account, when he accidentally entered
chmod .
, which changed his . file permissions to zero, and not even the sysadmin
could
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Alex Samad wrote:
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 07:55:59PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
I have created a new data partition for a Ubuntu/Debian dual boot
system, using gparted from the Debian 4 installation.
[snip]
chmod 777 /data
I think when you use octects you have
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
If I use the format above, no error is returned; it just doesn't do
anything.
chmod 777 /data
You're changing the permissions of the directory...
bretnewworkstation:~# ls -l /data
total 16
drwx-- 2 root root 16384 2009-04-02 17:34 lost
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Bret Busby b...@busby.net wrote:
I know that is how the syntax used to be, because I remember a person (on a
UNIX system) losing his account, when he accidentally entered
chmod .
, which changed his . file
of the
account, he had effectively made his account, totally inaccessible to
everyone, including the superuser.
Outside of enhanced access controls like SELinux and AppArmor, processes
with the euid of 0 ignore permission bits. Even if you chmod 000 a file on
purpose, a superuser can chmod
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 09:42:38AM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Bret Busby wrote:
[snip]
... but looking at the contents of the directory. To check the
permissions on /data itself, try
ls -l -d /data
how easy it is to miss the simple things ...
[snip]
--
You can't cheat the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dexter Filmore wrote:
Won't do me good, lots of subdirs where I need to copy selections. Will mount
on another machine and copy over 100MBit, will have to do. Filed a bug
report, we'll see.
In the meantime you could have a look at rsync. It has
Dexter Filmore wrote:
I use these options to mount an NTFS partition:
users,gid=fuse,umask=0002,silent,utf8,locale=de_DE.utf8
Now silent is supposed to suppress warnings on chmod/chown errors, each time
a copy operation is completed I get couldn't change permissions on XY
I need to copy
Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 09:02:03 schrieb Raj Kiran Grandhi:
Dexter Filmore wrote:
I use these options to mount an NTFS partition:
users,gid=fuse,umask=0002,silent,utf8,locale=de_DE.utf8
Now silent is supposed to suppress warnings on chmod/chown errors, each
time a copy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dexter Filmore wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 09:02:03 schrieb Raj Kiran Grandhi:
Whatever is wrong with good old 'cp'? You can just add a redirect to
/dev/null if the warnings bother you.
What's wrong with the driver working as supposed
Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 20:02:33 schrieb Johannes Wiedersich:
Dexter Filmore wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 09:02:03 schrieb Raj Kiran Grandhi:
Whatever is wrong with good old 'cp'? You can just add a redirect to
/dev/null if the warnings bother you.
What's wrong with the
I use these options to mount an NTFS partition:
users,gid=fuse,umask=0002,silent,utf8,locale=de_DE.utf8
Now silent is supposed to suppress warnings on chmod/chown errors, each time
a copy operation is completed I get couldn't change permissions on XY
I need to copy a pretty big range of files
Jochen Schulz wrote:
The only idea that pops into my mind would be chroots for every user.
But I don't see a point in doing that.
Maybe just one chroot with absolute minimal software available for all users
or perhaps use ${YOUR_FAVOURITE_VIRTUALIZATION_SOFTWARE_HERE}?
--
Juha Tuuna
--
To
Shams Fantar wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to know if it's very fine and clean to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
can't access/read any file which isn't in their own home directory.
Regards,
Isn't it enough to just secure the home dirs? You
Hi all,
I'd like to know if it's very fine and clean to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
can't access/read any file which isn't in their own home directory.
Regards,
--
http://snurf.info
Civil Engineering section project : http://civil-e
Shams Fantar:
I'd like to know if it's very fine and clean to chmod -R 700 / ;
This will prevent non-root users from reading *any* file on the system.
If user 'shams' wants to list his home directory /home/shams, he has to
have permissions to list / and /home as well.
Or are there any
Shams Fantar wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to know if it's very fine and clean to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
can't access/read any file which isn't in their own home directory.
No, this is definitely wrong approach - risk to get broken
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 03:56:09PM +0200, Shams Fantar wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to know if it's very fine and clean to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
can't access/read any file which isn't in their own home directory.
Most likely
Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 03:56:09PM +0200, Shams Fantar wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to know if it's very fine and clean to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
can't access/read any file which isn't in their own home
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Shams Fantar wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to know if it's very fine and clean to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
can't access/read any file which isn't in their own home directory.
No, this is definitely
Jochen Schulz wrote:
Shams Fantar:
I'd like to know if it's very fine and clean to chmod -R 700 / ;
This will prevent non-root users from reading *any* file on the system.
If user 'shams' wants to list his home directory /home/shams, he has to
have permissions to list / and /home
Shams Fantar writes:
I'd like to know if it's very fine and clean to chmod -R 700 /
That would be a very, very, very bad idea. It would cripple your system
and you would probably end up reinstalling.
My purpose beeing that local users can't access/read any file which isn't
in their own home
On 10/12/08 08:56, Shams Fantar wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to know if it's very fine and clean to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
can't access/read any file which isn't in their own home directory.
As others have said, this is pretty much
John Hasler wrote:
Shams Fantar writes:
My purpose beeing that local users can't access/read any file which isn't
in their own home directory.
Then they would not be able to run any programs. What are you trying to
achieve? You can easily arrange for them not to be able to access
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 03:56:09PM +0200, Shams Fantar wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to know if it's very fine and clean to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
can't access/read any file which isn't in their own home directory.
So they can't ls
Hi!
I'm running a local setup using Debian Etch 4.0, Apache 2.2, PHP 5.2.0
(suPHP+Suhosin) - all are the default Debian Packages, as my development
system. The problem I'm having is that all files created by PHP Skript are only
chmoded to 600, so only the user who created them has read access
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:25:35PM -0300, Patricio Rojo wrote:
- If you try 'ls', then its contents are shown
Yes, because you have read permission.
- If you try 'cd' to it, you get permission denied.
Yes, because you do not have search (x) permission.
- If you try 'ls -l', you get many
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:08:12PM +1100, Owen Townend wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 12:49 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
.
can you provide the exact output from ls -l? Usually, ???
indicates some kind of filesystem damage.
.
I'm running Ubuntu 7.10 and was able to
Hi,
I don't know whether this is a bug or it is expected behavior. If
this is a bug I would appreciate someone telling me who to report it
to:D...
I recently noticed that strange things happen if you do 'chmod 670' on
a directory that you own, and whose group is set to one you belong
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 13:25 -0300, Patricio Rojo wrote:
Hi,
I don't know whether this is a bug or it is expected behavior. If
this is a bug I would appreciate someone telling me who to report it
to:D...
I recently noticed that strange things happen if you do 'chmod 670
recently noticed that strange things happen if you do 'chmod 670' on
a directory that you own, and whose group is set to one you belong.
- If you try 'ls', then its contents are shown
- If you try 'cd' to it, you get permission denied.
- If you try 'ls -l', you get many interrogation signs
Patricio Rojo wrote:
Hi,
I don't know whether this is a bug or it is expected behavior. If
this is a bug I would appreciate someone telling me who to report it
to:D...
I recently noticed that strange things happen if you do 'chmod 670' on
a directory that you own, and whose group is set
appreciate someone telling me who to report it
to:D...
I recently noticed that strange things happen if you do 'chmod 670' on
a directory that you own, and whose group is set to one you belong.
- If you try 'ls', then its contents are shown
- If you try 'cd' to it, you
Owen Townend [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 13:25 -0300, Patricio Rojo wrote:
I recently noticed that strange things happen if you do 'chmod 670' on
a directory that you own, and whose group is set to one you belong.
- If you try 'ls', then its contents are shown
Raj Kiran Grandhi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there some reason why you would chmod 670 and not chmod 770?
To cause filesystem breakage? :-) It's not a bright thing to do.
Users do a lot of not bright things. We should know what's going to
happen when they do this.
It's interesting phenomena
Thank Wei Chen,
you solved all my doubts.
I am using Drupal as CMS, it is great. I recommend you to use it.
So long, and thanks very much
Jordi R Cardona
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just one last question Wei Chen:
And the files inside that folders are ok chmoded that way?
Jordi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19 Mar 2007 04:18:27 -0700, Jordi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just one last question Wei Chen:
And the files inside that folders are ok chmoded that way?
Thanks for your recommendation.
Yes. All files can be set 644 and all directories can be set 755
except that the upload directory should
Thanks Wei Chen!!
Jordi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
I have a web server in my PC. I need to chmod the files correctly so I
don't have a security risk.
I am using a CMS for the website.
I have full access to my pc, as it is in my house, and I can
manipulate it through keyboard, so I have no problem to change the
chmod to the most restrictive
On 18 Mar 2007 09:16:35 -0700, Jordi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I have a web server in my PC. I need to chmod the files correctly so I
don't have a security risk.
I am using a CMS for the website.
I have full access to my pc, as it is in my house, and I can
manipulate it through keyboard
Hi Wei Chen,
Thanks for that excelent info.
I think 755 is all right. The execute bit for a directory means the
permission of going into the directory.
And what about setting the files to chmod 744 ? That way will be
better? Or not?
Jordi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 18 Mar 2007 13:24:54 -0700, Jordi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Wei Chen,
Thanks for that excelent info.
I think 755 is all right. The execute bit for a directory means the
permission of going into the directory.
And what about setting the files to chmod 744 ? That way will be
better
Hi:
I know it's already pretty late to try to provide some hints on this
issue, but didn't like to miss the chance in case some other people
might hit same issue in the future.
Provided plugin for Squirrelmail + Cyrus + SASL uses, as per code, a call to saslpasswd2 binary. In fact, it's
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 08:25:03PM +0200, Eugenio Jordán González wrote:
Hi:
I know it's already pretty late to try to provide some hints on this issue,
but
didn't like to miss the chance in case some other people might hit same issue
in the future.
Provided plugin for Squirrelmail +
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:38:12PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 08:25:03PM +0200, Eugenio Jordán González wrote:
Hi:
I know it's already pretty late to try to provide some hints on this issue,
but
didn't like to miss the chance in case some other people might hit
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:51:03PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
snip
Hmm. I am part of the cyrus-sasl maintenance team and we are
desperately trying to get away from the current packages since they have
essentially been unmaintained for over two years. We just uploaded the
But would I be
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 12:22:47AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:51:03PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
snip
Hmm. I am part of the cyrus-sasl maintenance team and we are
desperately trying to get away from the current packages since they have
essentially been
de Laia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 11:07 AM
Subject: [OT] Executar CHMOD via gFTP
Pessoal,
Estamos ajustando um servidor web em um freeBSD com essas configuracoes:
FreeBSD 6.1-RC FreeBSD 6.1-RC #0
Apache/2.0.55 (FreeBSD) PHP
Paulo Estrela - UNIFACS wrote:
Olá,
Muito provavelmente alguém fez alterações na configuração do servidor FTP
não permitindo que você altere a permissões dos arquivos. Procure o
administrador desse servidor e pergunte a ele se ele não modificou algo.
Ola Paulo e demais,
Com relacao a
pasta root do site por meio do gFTP. Mas, hoje, quando loguei la, nao
consegui mais. Da erro:
SITE CHMOD 777 phpinfo.php
550 phpinfo.php: Permission denied
Alguem teria alguma sugestao sobre o assunto?
O que eu teria feito no meu gFTP para que isso tornasse impossivel de
realizar?
Ou seria
Pessoal,
Tenho uma partição com 24G de arquivos em vários diretórios que está a
maior bagunça em relação a permissões de acesso.
Gostaria de dar um chmod 755 para todos os diretórios/subdirs e chmod 644
para todos os arquivos, mas não tenho idéia de como fazer.
--
Fabio.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
1 - 100 of 450 matches
Mail list logo
