Shams Fantar wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to know if it's very fine and "clean" to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
can't access/read any file which isn't in their own home directory.
Regards,
Isn't it enough to just secure the home dirs? You pr
Jochen Schulz wrote:
> The only idea that pops into my mind would be chroots for every user.
> But I don't see a point in doing that.
Maybe just one chroot with absolute minimal software available for all users
or perhaps use ${YOUR_FAVOURITE_VIRTUALIZATION_SOFTWARE_HERE}?
--
Juha Tuuna
--
T
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 03:56:09PM +0200, Shams Fantar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know if it's very fine and "clean" to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
> are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
> can't access/read any file which isn't in their own home directory.
So they can
John Hasler wrote:
> Shams Fantar writes:
>
>> My purpose beeing that local users can't access/read any file which isn't
>> in their own home directory.
>>
>
> Then they would not be able to run any programs. What are you trying to
> achieve? You can easily arrange for them not to be able
On 10/12/08 08:56, Shams Fantar wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to know if it's very fine and "clean" to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
can't access/read any file which isn't in their own home directory.
As others have said, this is pretty much
Shams Fantar writes:
> I'd like to know if it's very fine and "clean" to chmod -R 700 /
That would be a very, very, very bad idea. It would cripple your system
and you would probably end up reinstalling.
> My purpose beeing that local users can't access/read any file which isn't
> in their own h
Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Shams Fantar:
>
>> I'd like to know if it's very fine and "clean" to chmod -R 700 / ;
>>
>
> This will prevent non-root users from reading *any* file on the system.
>
> If user 'shams' wants to list his home directory /home/shams, he has to
> have permissions to list
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Shams Fantar wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to know if it's very fine and "clean" to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
>> are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
>> can't access/read any file which isn't in their own home directory.
>>
> No, th
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 03:56:09PM +0200, Shams Fantar wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to know if it's very fine and "clean" to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
>> are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
>> can't access/read any file which isn't in their own
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 03:56:09PM +0200, Shams Fantar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know if it's very fine and "clean" to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
> are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
> can't access/read any file which isn't in their own home directory.
Most likely
Shams Fantar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know if it's very fine and "clean" to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
> are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
> can't access/read any file which isn't in their own home directory.
No, this is definitely wrong approach - risk to get br
Shams Fantar:
>
> I'd like to know if it's very fine and "clean" to chmod -R 700 / ;
This will prevent non-root users from reading *any* file on the system.
If user 'shams' wants to list his home directory /home/shams, he has to
have permissions to list / and /home as well.
> Or are there any b
Hi all,
I'd like to know if it's very fine and "clean" to chmod -R 700 / ; Or
are there any better solutions ? My purpose beeing that local users
can't access/read any file which isn't in their own home directory.
Regards,
--
http://snurf.info
"Civil Engineering section" project : http://civil-e
13 matches
Mail list logo
