Re: colorized ls

2010-05-10 Thread Mart Frauenlob
On 09.05.2010 22:26, Rick Pasotto wrote: > What did I update recently that caused me to lose ls coloring with this > error message: > > ls: unrecognized prefix: hl > ls: unparsable value for LS_COLORS environment variable > > How should I fix it? > Using lenny here, but it has been set in .bashr

Re: colorized ls

2010-05-10 Thread godo
On 05/09/2010 10:26 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote: What did I update recently that caused me to lose ls coloring with this error message: ls: unrecognized prefix: hl ls: unparsable value for LS_COLORS environment variable How should I fix it? Hi, looks like coreutils bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

Re: colorized ls

2010-05-09 Thread Chris
Just type source .bashrc Sent from my BlackBerry® -Original Message- From: Rick Pasotto Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 17:48:56 To: Subject: Re: colorized ls On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 04:44:08PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 05/09/2010 03:26 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote: > >What did I update

Re: colorized ls

2010-05-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 05/09/2010 04:48 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote: On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 04:44:08PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: On 05/09/2010 03:26 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote: What did I update recently that caused me to lose ls coloring with this error message: What exactly (Stable, Testing, Sid) did you update, and w

Re: colorized ls

2010-05-09 Thread Rick Pasotto
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 04:44:08PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 05/09/2010 03:26 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote: > >What did I update recently that caused me to lose ls coloring with this > >error message: > > What exactly (Stable, Testing, Sid) did you update, and what command > did you use to update i

Re: colorized ls

2010-05-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 05/09/2010 03:26 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote: What did I update recently that caused me to lose ls coloring with this error message: What exactly (Stable, Testing, Sid) did you update, and what command did you use to update it? ls: unrecognized prefix: hl ls: unparsable value for LS_COLORS en

Re: colorized ls

2010-05-09 Thread Rick Pasotto
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 10:33:23PM +0200, d.sastre.med...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 04:26:36PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote: > > What did I update recently that caused me to lose ls coloring with this > > error message: > > > > ls: unrecognized prefix: hl > > ls: unparsable value for

Re: colorized ls

2010-05-09 Thread Alexander Batischev
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 04:26:36PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote: > What did I update recently that caused me to lose ls coloring with this > error message: > > ls: unrecognized prefix: hl > ls: unparsable value for LS_COLORS environment variable > > How should I fix it? In academic interest you can

Re: colorized ls

2010-05-09 Thread d . sastre . medina
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 04:26:36PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote: > What did I update recently that caused me to lose ls coloring with this > error message: > > ls: unrecognized prefix: hl > ls: unparsable value for LS_COLORS environment variable > > How should I fix it? If you are using system-wide

colorized ls

2010-05-09 Thread Rick Pasotto
What did I update recently that caused me to lose ls coloring with this error message: ls: unrecognized prefix: hl ls: unparsable value for LS_COLORS environment variable How should I fix it? -- "I am only one. But I am one. I cannot do everything but I can do something. And I will not let wha

Re: Colorized ls problem

2005-01-06 Thread Jon Dowland
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 07:49:01PM -0600, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > And the other problem there is that /usr/doc/fileutils and > the info pages don't seem to give me any clue where to report bugs > to. The debian BTS in the first instance (e.g. via reportbug) - then the bug can be sent upstream

Colorized ls problem

2005-01-05 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
The default setup seems to alias ls to ls --color. When this is run in an emacs shell window (on a character cell terminal in my test; though I think it does the same thing under X), the output comes out colorized -- even though the terminal type is set to DUMB there, and DUMB isn't on the list of