compiler in PATH ?

1999-05-18 Thread Pollywog
After reinstalling Linux, I get this: configure: error: no acceptable C++-compiler found in $PATH I am not sure what it wants. Does it want to see the path to gcc in /etc/profile? -- Andrew

RE: compiler in PATH ?

1999-05-18 Thread Pollywog
On 18-May-99 Pollywog wrote: After reinstalling Linux, I get this: configure: error: no acceptable C++-compiler found in $PATH I am not sure what it wants. Does it want to see the path to gcc in /etc/profile? Oh wait, gcc is for C not C++ right? Which compiler will I need to install, g

Re: compiler in PATH ?

1999-05-18 Thread David Z. Maze
Pollywog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Pollywog After reinstalling Linux, I get this: Pollywog configure: error: no acceptable C++-compiler found in $PATH Pollywog Pollywog I am not sure what it wants. Does it want to see the path Pollywog to gcc in /etc/profile? gcc isn't a C++ compiler, it's a C

Re: compiler in PATH ?

1999-05-18 Thread Pollywog
On 18-May-99 David Z. Maze wrote: gcc isn't a C++ compiler, it's a C compiler. You should have g++ somewhere in your $PATH (if you install the Debian g++ package, in /usr/bin). If you haven't yet, install the g++ package and its dependencies. I realized later that gcc is not for C++ so I

Re: compiler in PATH ?

1999-05-18 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
On 18-May-99 David Z. Maze wrote: gcc isn't a C++ compiler, it's a C compiler. You should have g++ somewhere in your $PATH (if you install the Debian g++ package, in /usr/bin). If you haven't yet, install the g++ package and its dependencies. I realized later that gcc is not

Re: compiler in PATH ?

1999-05-18 Thread Pollywog
On 18-May-99 E.L. Meijer \(Eric\) wrote: The 27 and 272 packages provide support for older versions of g++. You don't want to use these for compiling programs unless the program depends on the bugs in the 2.7.2 compiler. For slink, you need to get the following packages: g++