On Fri, Aug 28 2009, Celejar wrote:
> Assuming that you're building kernel packages with kernel-package, you
> may be being hit by this:
>
> "The image postinst no longer runs the initramfs creation commands.
> Instead, there are example scripts provided that will perform the task.
> These script
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:07:45 +0800
Niu Kun wrote:
> bdebreil 写道:
...
> > Now, with Lenny, I haven't so far been able to go any further in
> > recompiling usable kernels. 2.6.30.4 did compile without errors, but
> > then I found that I had no 'mkinitrd' on my new system. How am I to
> > generate
bdebreil 写道:
Hi to Everyone,
With my old SARGE system, as stated here last week, I was unable to boot
newly compiled kernels, most likely because of the faulty initrd.img
that I got using 'mkinitrd'. For this reason, I decided to install
Lenny.
Now, with Lenny, I haven't so far been able to go
Hi to Everyone,
With my old SARGE system, as stated here last week, I was unable to boot
newly compiled kernels, most likely because of the faulty initrd.img
that I got using 'mkinitrd'. For this reason, I decided to install
Lenny.
Now, with Lenny, I haven't so far been able to go any further in
Jens Simmoleit anymotion.de> writes:
> Does somebody know a really good Howto, which explains how
> to compile a kernel step by step?
Yes, check the Kernel Compiling How-to at the Newbiedoc project:
http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net
--M. Kirchhoff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
M
Subject: Re: Help on compiling new kernel
> Jens Simmoleit wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > there is one thing I never did before and that is compiling a kernel.
> >
> > I've got an old 266er dual board and would like to compile the kernel
> > that it will al
Jens Simmoleit wrote:
Hi list,
there is one thing I never did before and that is compiling a kernel.
I've got an old 266er dual board and would like to compile the kernel
that it will also use the second cpu, in addition to that I'd like to
use lvm-mod and the LVM10, so that I can build logic
Hi list,
there is one thing I never did before and that is compiling a kernel.
I've got an old 266er dual board and would like to compile the kernel that
it will also use the second cpu, in addition to that I'd like to use lvm-mod and
the LVM10, so that I can build logical volume groups.
Markku Kellberg wrote:
sön 2003-12-07 klockan 00.11 skrev H. S.:
Hi,
While doing a google search to read pages on who to compile a new Linux
kernel the Debian way, I see some of them mentioning that I should first
delete a symlink "linux" in /usr/src if it exists before I untar and
unzip a dow
sön 2003-12-07 klockan 00.11 skrev H. S.:
> Hi,
>
> While doing a google search to read pages on who to compile a new Linux
> kernel the Debian way, I see some of them mentioning that I should first
> delete a symlink "linux" in /usr/src if it exists before I untar and
> unzip a download kernel
Travis Crump wrote:
As I wrote above, some instructions suggest deleting it and recreating
it to my new kernel directory. So if I do not have it, I was wondering
if I should create it (of course I cannot "re"create it).
In any case, I was also expecting someone who says I *should* have
that li
"H. S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I guess I am missing something here. I have a file
> kernel-source-2.4.22.tar.bz2 in /usr/src, and when I do:
> {src}> tar -jtf kernel-source-2.4.22.tar.bz2
>
> I get the listing as:
> {src}> tar -jtf kernel-source-2.4.22.tar.bz2
> kernel-source-2.4.22/
> kern
H. S. wrote:
Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corsetti Dutra wrote:
Em Sat, 06 Dec 2003 18:11:13 -0500, H. S. escreveu:
some of them mentioning that I should first
delete a symlink "linux" in /usr/src if it exists before I untar and
unzip
a download kernel file, and then recreate it. Some pages do not s
Björn Lindström wrote:
"H. S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
While doing a google search to read pages on who to compile a new
Linux kernel the Debian way, I see some of them mentioning that I
should first delete a symlink "linux" in /usr/src if it exists before
I untar and unzip a download kernel
"H. S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While doing a google search to read pages on who to compile a new
> Linux kernel the Debian way, I see some of them mentioning that I
> should first delete a symlink "linux" in /usr/src if it exists before
> I untar and unzip a download kernel file, and then r
Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corsetti Dutra wrote:
Em Sat, 06 Dec 2003 18:11:13 -0500, H. S. escreveu:
some of them mentioning that I should first
delete a symlink "linux" in /usr/src if it exists before I untar and unzip
a download kernel file, and then recreate it. Some pages do not suggest
this. Is
Em Sat, 06 Dec 2003 18:11:13 -0500, H. S. escreveu:
> some of them mentioning that I should first
> delete a symlink "linux" in /usr/src if it exists before I untar and unzip
> a download kernel file, and then recreate it. Some pages do not suggest
> this. Is this a step crucial?
[...]
> clean, th
Hi,
While doing a google search to read pages on who to compile a new Linux
kernel the Debian way, I see some of them mentioning that I should first
delete a symlink "linux" in /usr/src if it exists before I untar and
unzip a download kernel file, and then recreate it. Some pages do not
sugges
Alex Malinovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been rolling my own kernel using make-kpkg and the other wonderful
> tools we Debianites have at our disposal for over a year now, yet
> something just occured to me. Is it possible to compile individual
> kernel modules outside of the actual kern
Alex Malinovich wrote:
I've been rolling my own kernel using make-kpkg and the other wonderful
tools we Debianites have at our disposal for over a year now, yet
something just occured to me. Is it possible to compile individual
kernel modules outside of the actual kernel compilation? I still have
I've been rolling my own kernel using make-kpkg and the other wonderful
tools we Debianites have at our disposal for over a year now, yet
something just occured to me. Is it possible to compile individual
kernel modules outside of the actual kernel compilation? I still have
the full source director
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 4:22 AM
Subject: Re: weird problem with init after compiling new kernel
Did you ever find a solution to this problem? I'm having a similar
problem with a Pentium system. If you did find a solution, could you
please let me know what it was? Thanks,
Peter
> "Wouter" == Wouter Bakker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wouter> to try and make things a little more clear: the kernel boots!
Wouter> Lilo works fine! it is the init part where all activity halts
Wouter> at the point where normally the supplementary hardware (sound,
Wouter> network, mice, spec
led with kernel but not yet
with system configuration.
??que?? I'm confused of this.
Help!
Mythiq.
- Original Message -
From: ktb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: weird problem with init after compiling new kernel
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 a
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 12:45:03AM +0200, Mythiq wrote:
> hello everyone,
>
> I have compiled a new kernel for an 486 which was going to be a filtering
> firewall. Not for a while I'm afraid, because it won't boot up anymore. (btw:
> I started with a clean freshly installed system with debian 2.
hello everyone,
I have compiled a new kernel for an 486 which was
going to be a filtering firewall. Not for a while I'm afraid, because it won't
boot up anymore. (btw: I started with a clean freshly installed system with
debian 2.2.18pre21)
Lilo works fine; it boots the kernel;
after the ke
hi
it worked thanks
Yes I had to enable CONFIG_EKSPERIMENTAL
/jens
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Erik Steffl wrote:
> seach for dmfe.c in dirver/net/Makefile, you'll find that it is
> compiled if CONFIG_DM9102 is set. Then (in kernel source root):
>
> find . -name Makefile -print|xargs grep CONFIG_D
seach for dmfe.c in dirver/net/Makefile, you'll find that it is
compiled if CONFIG_DM9102 is set. Then (in kernel source root):
find . -name Makefile -print|xargs grep CONFIG_DM9102
and you'll find that ./drivers/net/Config.in says:
if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" = "y" ]; then
tristat
I'm using make menuconfig and thats working fine, but I cant find dmfe
under the netcard drivers, all though I can find the file
/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.17/drivers/net/dmfe.c
So its there, so how do I include it, when I'm compiling.
with potato, 2.2.17-compact it works fine!
what is wrong??
use make-kpkg, read the docs (it's quite simple). at one point it asks
you to configure kernel - do it by run make config (command line), make
menuconfig (ncurses required, text based gui), make xconfig (x windows
interface, I think you need tk and wish for this). there you have a
chance to decid
hi
I'm about to recompile my potato 2.2.17 kernel.
But how do I include dmfe (netcard driver) so I can load it
as a module???
thanks in advance
---
Jens Lauterbach
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roskilde University
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> procps has what you need. To get the versions 2.2.15 wants, you need to
> upgrade your system to debian 2.2 (potato). potato is currently frozen and in
not necessarily. on my system:
ii procps 2.0.6-6The /proc file system utilities.
ii util-linux
>
> package dselect version recommended version
> == ==
> Procps 1.2.9-3 2.0.3
> Util-linux 2.9g-6 2.9z
>
> I have updated my dselect packages list, and it appears that no newer
> versions are available. Do I ne
I have just installed Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 with kernel 2.0.36 and wanted to
update the kernel to 2.2
I downloaded the source code for the Linux kernel 2.2.15
I was reading the Documentation/Changes document to make sure I had the
necessary versions of the various software packages. I found that t
Hello,
Before anything else, I'd like to thank the people who have helped
me before. This has been really nice... And so far, support here in
this list has been really efficient. Thank you all.
Ok - now, to my little problem:
I have a Pentium II 400Mh with 64Mb RAM; my motherboard an
well, some people ( myself included ) rarely if ever use dselect
and should not be bound to do so just get this "standard" package
installed.
i've compiled enough kernels and done enough installs and could argue
that i myself would install this package by rote but that has yet to
be the case and
First thing I did after my install was remove all unused packages that didn't
cause dselect to have kittens. bin86 was one of them. found that out quick
enough. The second thing I tried to do after install was recompile he kernel.
Bryan
> I can't understand how so many people seem to "lose" bi
Quoting Nick Barron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> ok, so we everyone is clear
>
> i am trying to get the make bzImage command to write this
>
> /usr/src/linux-2.2.x/arch/i386/boot/bzImage
>
> but it doesn't, it gives me an error
>
> make[1]: as86: Command not found
> make[1]: *** [bbootsect.o] Error
Once upon a time, I heard Nick Barron say
> ok, so we everyone is clear
>
> i am trying to get the make bzImage command to write this
>
> /usr/src/linux-2.2.x/arch/i386/boot/bzImage
>
> but it doesn't, it gives me an error
>
> make[1]: as86: Command not found
^^
He means:
Nick Barron wrote:
> second, translate this into english please:
>
> #dpkg -S as86
as the root user (# prompt) run the command 'dpkg -S as86'
> bin86: /usr/share/doc/bin86/examples/as86_encap
> bin86: /usr/bin/as86
> bin86: /usr/share/man/man1/as86.1.gz
This is the output of the dpk
Nick Barron wrote:
>
> ok first off, it is 'I heard Beavis say' not said u nerd!
>
> second, translate this into english please:
>
> #dpkg -S as86
> bin86: /usr/share/doc/bin86/examples/as86_encap
> bin86: /usr/bin/as86
> bin86: /usr/share/man/man1/as86.1.gz
>
> pretend I am a newbie, which i a
Once upon a time, I heard Nick Barron say
> ok first off, it is 'I heard Beavis say' not said u nerd!
Terribly sorry for my bad English, I hope that I get it right this time!
> second, translate this into english please:
I'm not sure whether I could translate this into a good English or not.
> #
ok first off, it is 'I heard Beavis say' not said u nerd!
second, translate this into english please:
#dpkg -S as86
bin86: /usr/share/doc/bin86/examples/as86_encap
bin86: /usr/bin/as86
bin86: /usr/share/man/man1/as86.1.gz
pretend I am a newbie, which i am.please don't tell anybody!
how would
.2.14/arch/i386/boot'
make: *** [bzImage] Error 2
and doesn't create the bzImage file
why?
- Original Message -
From: John Leget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Beavis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: compiling new kernel
> U
486/33 8MB 2.0.36
> "Daniel" == Daniel Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello there, On 7 Mar 2000, Marshal Wong wrote:
>> If I may inquire, why are you trying to compile a 2.2.x kernel
>> for a i386? That's going to hurt. I compiled a 2.0.x kernel
>> on my old 486 and
Hello there,
On 7 Mar 2000, Marshal Wong wrote:
> If I may inquire, why are you trying to compile a 2.2.x kernel for a
> i386? That's going to hurt. I compiled a 2.0.x kernel on my old 486
> and it took over 5 hours!
What kind of kernel did you compile, and on what kind of machine?
I compil
You are missing the assembler. Install bin86.
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 03:55:08PM -0800, Beavis wrote:
> i am trying to compile the kernel 2.2.14 on to my i386 machine
> please help if u can, thnakx
>
> update:
>
> after doing make bzImage, it starts to compile, which takes about 10 mins or
> so
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 03:18:52PM -0800, Beavis wrote:
> this is what i am doing:
>
>
> >Once that is all done and you choose "Exit" and save your config file, you
> must >run make dep followed by make clean. And now the fun begins, type make
> >bzImage to build your kernel. This will take awhil
> "Beavis" == Beavis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i am trying to compile the kernel 2.2.14 on to my i386 machine
> please help if u can, thnakx
> update:
> after doing make bzImage, it starts to compile, which takes
> about 10 mins or so right. then at the end it say
Once upon a time, I heard Beavis said
> as86 -0 -a -o bbootsect.o bbootsect.s
> make[1]: as86: Command not found
> make[1]: *** [bbootsect.o] Error 127
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-2.2.14/arch/i386/boot'
> make: *** [bzImage] Error 2
> >
> >
>
Ughh, just run an additional command ( after youve installed bin86 re previous
email)
make install
does the work of copying and running lilo at the end.
Id suggest you modify "/etc/lilo.conf" to also point to a known working kernel
and
have a resue disk and maybe even a boot disk handy.
Th
Youre missing a package on your system
( Well what do you know im actually learning this stuff )
did a "dpkg -S as86"
you need to install the "bin86" package
cheers
Beavis wrote:
> i am trying to compile the kernel 2.2.14 on to my i386 machine
> please help if u can, thnakx
>
> update:
>
> a
> i am trying to compile the kernel 2.2.14 on to my i386 machine
> please help if u can, thnakx
>
> update:
>
> after doing make bzImage, it starts to compile, which takes about 10 mins or
> so right.
> then at the end it says:
>
> as86 -0 -a -o bbootsect.o bbootsect.s
> make[1]: as86: Command
i am trying to compile the kernel 2.2.14 on to my i386 machine
please help if u can, thnakx
update:
after doing make bzImage, it starts to compile, which takes about 10 mins
or
so right.
then at the end it says:
>
as86 -0 -a -o bbootsect.o bbootsect.s
make[1]: as86: Command not found
make[1]:
i am trying to compile the kernel 2.2.14 on to my i386 machine
please help if u can, thnakx
update:
after doing make bzImage, it starts to compile, which takes about 10 mins or
so right.
then at the end it says:
as86 -0 -a -o bbootsect.o bbootsect.s
make[1]: as86: Command not found
make[1]: ***
this is what i am doing:
>Once that is all done and you choose "Exit" and save your config file, you
must >run make dep followed by make clean. And now the fun begins, type make
>bzImage to build your kernel. This will take awhile (15mins+) so go browse
>our site a little and send us some feedbac
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Pollywog wrote:
> After compiling kernel 2.2.10 and trying to install new software, I got:
>
> make all-recursive
> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/pollywog/ksnuffle-0.2'
> Making all in libpcap-0.4
> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/pollywog/ksnuffle-0.2/libpcap-0.4'
>
Pollywog wrote:
> After compiling kernel 2.2.10 and trying to install new software, I got:
...
> ./pcap-linux.c:31: net/if.h: No such file or directory
...
> Why does this happen? Am I doing something wrong? It seems I frequently
> "lose" if.h
In the 2.2.x kernels, if.h is in include/linux/, so
After compiling kernel 2.2.10 and trying to install new software, I got:
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/pollywog/ksnuffle-0.2'
Making all in libpcap-0.4
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/pollywog/ksnuffle-0.2/libpcap-0.4'
gcc -g -I. -Ilinux-include -DHAVE_MALLOC_H=1 -DHA
59 matches
Mail list logo
