marks
over them.
Sorry forgot to mention that after running mate-appearances
it hangs around after being closed soaking up almost 100%
cpu time.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
I am running Mate desktop on an updated Debian Sid.
Today when I attempted to change themes, I noticed
nearly all the themes had big question marks on top
of theme in the appearances manager. In addition
when I tried to customize a theme all the windows
controls, icon themes etc all had question
Hi,
We have observed a strange behaviour on our compute-nodes after the
upgrade to squeeze and on new nodes freshly installed with squeeze.
All processes running longer than 24.8 days lead to "nonsense"
cpu-time. Below is an example output of "ps -u username f" over time:
HI,
Juan Sierra Pons wrote:
2011/7/8 Mitchell Laks :
ps aux|grep find
I think it is /etc/cron.daily/mlocate wichi internally runs updatedb -
"update a database for mlocate"
Check your /etc/cron.daily/mlocate.
If it is mlocate, then you may want to exclude areas from the database.
For insta
2011/7/8 Mitchell Laks :
>
> Dear Gurus,
>
> this morning my computer is very sluggish and top says find is running.
>
> I did
>
> ps aux|grep find
>
> with this output
>
> root 25307 0.0 0.0 11132 652 ? SN 07:42 0:00 /bin/sh
> /usr/bin/updatedb.findutils
> root 25315 0.0
Dear Gurus,
this morning my computer is very sluggish and top says find is running.
I did
ps aux|grep find
with this output
root 25307 0.0 0.0 11132 652 ?SN 07:42 0:00 /bin/sh
/usr/bin/updatedb.findutils
root 25315 0.0 0.0 11136 352 ?SN 07:42 0:00 /
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:17:59AM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:54 AM, lee wrote:
> > BTW, I've given up attaching the game to a particular CPU and trying
> > to mess with the priority/scheduling. That doesn't seem to make it
> > faster, but more unresponsive to ke
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:54 AM, lee wrote:
> BTW, I've given up attaching the game to a particular CPU and trying
> to mess with the priority/scheduling. That doesn't seem to make it
> faster, but more unresponsive to keyboard inputs. I guess LGP just
> needs to fix the game. The Windoze vers
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 01:15:57PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >I doesn't matter much if other processes are running. When the RAID-1
> >is resyncing, it slows it down some, but I can compile a kernel while
> >the game is running.
>
> It sounds like your problem is I/O, not CPU. You mi
e -20 command
>>
>> Sorry that's mildly spoken wrong. A normal user can only reduce
>> his share of CPU time using nice and you don't want to propose
>> running a game as root I hope.
>
>I can start the game as user and then renice it as root. But renic
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:25:40AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 07:38 +, Joel Roth wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:14:31PM -0600, lee wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > simple question:
> > >
> > > How do I
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 07:38 +, Joel Roth wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:14:31PM -0600, lee wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > simple question:
> >
> > How do I provide a particular process with as much CPU time as
> > possible?
> [snip]
> > I only
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:14:31PM -0600, lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> simple question:
>
> How do I provide a particular process with as much CPU time as
> possible?
[snip]
> I only want that game I'm playing to run faster.
1. Start the program using 'nice':
Hi,
simple question:
How do I provide a particular process with as much CPU time as
possible?
Use schedtool and assign it to a particular CPU (core)? Fine, but how
do I keep this core free from other tasks?
Read /Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt --- fine, this tells me that I
can create
Feb 01, 2007 at 09:22:08AM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
I accidentally discovered this morning that Xorg is taking up
25 percent of cpu time when at idle. Is this normal or should
I file a bug?
I'm running Etch.
Gnome Panel Monitors (you know animations for load average and so
on) have thi
> >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:22:08AM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I accidentally discovered this morning that Xorg is taking up
> > > > > 25 percent of cpu time when at idle. Is this normal or should
> >
at Xorg is taking up 25
> > > > percent of cpu time when at idle. Is this normal or should I
> > > > file a bug?
> > > >
> > > > I'm running Etch.
> > >
>
> Gnome Panel Monitors (you know animations for load average and so o
te:
> >
> > > I accidentally discovered this morning that Xorg is taking up 25
> > > percent of cpu time when at idle. Is this normal or should I file a bug?
> > >
> > > I'm running Etch.
> >
> > I suppose it depends on what kind of box you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:33:05 -0500
Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:22:08AM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> > I accidentally discovered this morning that Xorg is taking up 25
> >
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:22:08AM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
> I accidentally discovered this morning that Xorg is taking up 25
> percent of cpu time when at idle. Is this normal or should I file a bug?
>
> I'm running Etch.
I suppose it depends on what kind of box y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I accidentally discovered this morning that Xorg is taking up 25
percent of cpu time when at idle. Is this normal or should I file a bug?
I'm running Etch.
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/
I've noticed that every day (around evening time) famd
starts using up lots of CPU time (e.g. 95%, according to top) and it does this for a long time.
Is this normal? What's it doing?
I do not think so. Restart the daemon and everything is okay. Or stop
the daemon. That is what
Hello Yasir!
> I've got a current version of Etch and I've noticed that every day (around
> evening time) famd
> starts using up lots of CPU time (e.g. 95%, according to top) and it does
> this for a long time.
>
> Is this normal? What's it doing?
I do not
I've got a current version of Etch and I've noticed that every day
(around evening time) famd starts using up lots of CPU time (e.g. 95%,
according to top) and it does this for a long time.
Is this normal? What's it doing?
Thanks,
Yasir
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 15:17, Greg Folkert wrote:
> Vi, even then it might just not be noticed. I am thinking that you are
> not clear as to what FAMD just is.
>
> ---
> Description: File Alteration Monitor
> FAM monitors files and directories, notifying interested applications
> >
> > Famd on my system sometimes hogged all my CPU time and system
> > monitor shows
> > it takes about 99% of the cycles.
> >
I've seen this too, now I use gamin on sid as an alternative to fam and I don't
have this problem anymore.
also, that'
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 14:39 -0500, Vi Arguelles wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 August 2005 05:46, Saverio Trioni wrote:
> >
> > Hi. I have the same problem. I don't dare to kill famd but it runs as
> > my user. I think it should run as root...
Saverio, if it ran as root for managing your stuff... hmm that
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 05:46, Saverio Trioni wrote:
>
> Hi. I have the same problem. I don't dare to kill famd but it runs as
> my user. I think it should run as root...
>
Mmm, I did it once. I didn't kill it kill it. I just restarted the daemon and
all was well. I had no problems, but YMMV. If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saverio Trioni wrote:
> I just observed it happens when I open big documents with evince. Does
> it happen to you also? Maybe it's a bug in Evince and should be filed.
I don't use Evince (anyway, what's this?) and had encountered that bug
one or two
El 25/07/2005, a las 11:27, phyrster escribió:
Hi Debianers,
Famd on my system sometimes hogged all my CPU time and system
monitor shows
it takes about 99% of the cycles.
I just observed it happens when I open big documents with evince.
Does it happen to you also? Maybe it's a b
El 25/07/2005, a las 11:27, phyrster escribió:
Hi Debianers,
Famd on my system sometimes hogged all my CPU time and system
monitor shows
it takes about 99% of the cycles.
My system configuration is Sarge (mixed with Sid) on an Athlon Tbird.
What has caused this problem and how to pin it
Hi Debianers,
Famd on my system sometimes hogged all my CPU time and system monitor shows
it takes about 99% of the cycles.
My system configuration is Sarge (mixed with Sid) on an Athlon Tbird.
What has caused this problem and how to pin it down?
regards
bxuef
--
dhammapada says
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:45:25PM +0100, Andreas Ehn wrote:
> I used debconf to configure ddclient and did not change the delay, which
> defaults to one minute. There is no "daemon=1m" line
> in /etc/ddclient.conf, but /etc/init.d/ddclient runs ddclient with this
> command line, which should do it
Wed 2004-12-08 at 16:27 +1100, Sam Watkins wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 07:17:46PM +0100, Andreas Ehn wrote:
>
> > I'm using ddclient 3.6.2-3 in Debian Sarge in daemon mode to keep my
> > DynDNS.org hostname updated. I have configured it to check the IP
> > address of eth0 every minute, but fo
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 07:17:46PM +0100, Andreas Ehn wrote:
> I'm using ddclient 3.6.2-3 in Debian Sarge in daemon mode to keep my
> DynDNS.org hostname updated. I have configured it to check the IP
> address of eth0 every minute, but for some reason ddclient uses 10 to
> 20 % of the CPU all the t
tis 2004-12-07 klockan 13:50 -0500 skrev Ben Bettin:
> I'm using Sarge as well, and have a DynDNS.org custom domain. I've
> only been using it for a few days, but the package I'm using is
> "ez-ipupdate". It was very easy to setup, and seems to be working
> fine.
I used ez-ipupdate before I reg
I'm using Sarge as well, and have a DynDNS.org custom domain. I've
only been using it for a few days, but the package I'm using is
"ez-ipupdate". It was very easy to setup, and seems to be working
fine.
Ben
On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 19:17:46 +0100, Andreas Ehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
Hi,
I'm using ddclient 3.6.2-3 in Debian Sarge in daemon mode to keep my
DynDNS.org hostname updated. I have configured it to check the IP
address of eth0 every minute, but for some reason ddclient uses 10 to
20 % of the CPU all the time.
Is there anything that can be done about it? I don't know
Hi...
I'm running KDE 3.1.2 from unstable and the artsd that's coming along. The
problem is that when running noatun, artsd is eating 15 to 30% CPU time,
depending on what type of file I'm playing (generally, high-quality OGG files
use more that 128kbit MP3s) and skips badly whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Pere Camps wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there any way to do that? I've read ulimit(1), but that only
> applies to bash(1) and it's sons (and it can also be changed). Another
> option would be automatically nicing p
Hi!
Is there any way to do that? I've read ulimit(1), but that only
applies to bash(1) and it's sons (and it can also be changed). Another
option would be automatically nicing proceses that use more CPU time than
their quota.
TIA!
-- p.
How is the cpu time of a process calculated?
Thanks
-Paul
42 matches
Mail list logo
