As per the Debian FAQ [1] I am building packages from source using:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b
However, some source packages produce multiple binary packages, is there
a way of just rebuilding the specific binary package I'm interested in?
(I've tried this out in man pages and using
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:04:51AM +, Tixy wrote:
As per the Debian FAQ [1] I am building packages from source using:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b
However, some source packages produce multiple binary packages, is there
a way of just rebuilding the specific binary package I'm
Tixy writes:
As per the Debian FAQ [1] I am building packages from source using:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b
However, some source packages produce multiple binary packages, is there
a way of just rebuilding the specific binary package I'm interested in?
(I've tried this out in man
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:05 +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote:
Tixy writes:
As per the Debian FAQ [1] I am building packages from source using:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b
However, some source packages produce multiple binary packages, is there
a way of just rebuilding the
Hi,
I'd like to be able to compile a package from source (ghemical, FWIW) so
that I can add so additional parameters not normally included which will
enhance the app for my purposes. The enhancements are part of the
upstream distribution (an interface with GAMESS).
Is there a way to do this
Kenward Vaughan ha scritto:
Hi,
I'd like to be able to compile a package from source (ghemical, FWIW) so
that I can add so additional parameters not normally included which will
enhance the app for my purposes. The enhancements are part of the
upstream distribution (an interface with GAMESS).
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 01:06 +0100, Davide Mancusi wrote:
Kenward Vaughan ha scritto:
Hi,
I'd like to be able to compile a package from source (ghemical, FWIW) so
that I can add so additional parameters not normally included which will
enhance the app for my purposes. The enhancements
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:31:06 -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to be able to compile a package from source (ghemical, FWIW) so
that I can add so additional parameters not normally included which will
enhance the app for my purposes. The enhancements are part of the
upstream
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 02:29 +, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:31:06 -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to be able to compile a package from source (ghemical, FWIW) so
that I can add so additional parameters not normally included which will
enhance the
Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 02:19:49AM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
Ok, i started again, but i still get the md5sum error. Could the
downloaded debian package be in error?
With the errors you're getting, this seems unlikely.
I've downloaded it twice from the bottom of this page:
Hi,
I'm trying to build gtk2.0-dbg .deb from source.
I downloaded:
gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.dsc
gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.diff.gz
gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
then:
tar -xzvf gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
gunzipgtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.diff.gz
patch -p0 gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.diff
cd gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig
~/SRC/GTK2
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:26:13PM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
I'm trying to build gtk2.0-dbg .deb from source.
I downloaded:
gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.dsc
gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.diff.gz
gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
then:
tar -xzvf gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
gunzipgtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.diff.gz
Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:26:13PM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
I'm trying to build gtk2.0-dbg .deb from source.
I downloaded:
gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.dsc
gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.diff.gz
gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
then:
tar -xzvf gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
gunzipgtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.diff.gz
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:19:42AM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
That's a ... convoluted (and wrong) way to extract a source package.
Remove that gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig directory, and try this instead:
dpkg-source -x gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.dsc
I thought there was an easier way! So
Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:19:42AM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
That's a ... convoluted (and wrong) way to extract a source package.
Remove that gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig directory, and try this instead:
dpkg-source -x gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.dsc
I thought there was an
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 02:19:49AM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
Ok, i started again, but i still get the md5sum error. Could the
downloaded debian package be in error?
With the errors you're getting, this seems unlikely.
I've downloaded it twice from the bottom of this page:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 02:39:13PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:26:13PM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
I'm trying to build gtk2.0-dbg .deb from source.
I downloaded:
gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.dsc
gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.diff.gz
gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
then:
tar
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:39:59PM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 02:39:13PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:26:13PM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
tar -xzvf gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
gunzipgtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.diff.gz
patch -p0
Hi,
Hopefully this will be a quick question: is it possible to build a woody
debian package on a testing machine? My server is at woody, but I don't
really want to build packages on a production machine.
Any information you can provide would be helpful.
-- Robert
--
This one time, at band camp, Robert James Kaes said:
Hi,
Hopefully this will be a quick question: is it possible to build a woody
debian package on a testing machine? My server is at woody, but I don't
really want to build packages on a production machine.
Any information you can provide
Robert James Kaes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-06 11:57:11 -0500]:
Hopefully this will be a quick question: is it possible to build a woody
debian package on a testing machine? My server is at woody, but I don't
really want to build packages on a production machine.
Because of the words used I
On Wed, 06 Nov 2002, Stephen Gran wrote:
Look into pbuilder - it's designed for doing stuff exactly like this. I
have a testing machine as my day to day desktop machine (it's also the
fastest of my non-server boxes) so I use it compile things for the other
boxes. pbuilder sets up a chroot
This one time, at band camp, Robert James Kaes said:
Thanks for the information. I'll give it a try. One last question: how
much space does the chroot environment consume on the hard drive? Take
the woody distribution as an example, if you could.
-- Robert
stevegashuffer:~$ du -H
On Sat, 6 Oct 2001, Pontus Edvardsson wrote:
Hi,
I believe I need to use 'dpkg -b /sourcedir packagename' but when trying
to build a package of the current iptables-1.2.3, it fails with an error
about not finding '../DEBIAN/control'... I then tried the option '--nocheck'
to no avail.
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:45:39AM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Then (in /usr/local/src/gsl/gsl-0.9.3) issue dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc
-rfakeroot. You will need to do all this as root.
fakeroot exists so that you don't have to do any of this as root. Since
you've already recommended -rfakeroot,
Although I successfully created a powerpc deb of qmail, I have
several questions about my methods.
I knew I need to start with the source, so using apt-get and the
following sources.list line:
#deb-src ftp://ftp.eecs.umich.edu/debian stable main contrib non-free
I retrieved (If i remember
I downloaded the source package (and dsc and diff) for Licq and then modified
debian/rules and then built Licq with my own config options.
The problem is that I have QT installed from source, and no Debian packages for
QT were found:
dh_fixperms
dh_installdeb
dh_shlibdeps
dpkg:
Hi pollywog!
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, pollywog wrote:
I downloaded the source package (and dsc and diff) for Licq and then modified
debian/rules and then built Licq with my own config options.
The problem is that I have QT installed from source, and no Debian packages
for
QT were found:
Each
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000 18:22:14 +0200, Peter Palfrader said:
As you see, you don't need libqt2 to build it, you need libqt2__-dev__.
In most cases you need the -dev packages of libraries if you want to
build stuff against them.
Yes, I do have that installed, but not as a Debian package.
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000 16:27:40 +, Peter Palfrader said:
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000 18:22:14 +0200, Peter Palfrader said:
As you see, you don't need libqt2 to build it, you need libqt2__-dev__.
In most cases you need the -dev packages of libraries if you want to
build stuff
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000 18:33:01 + (UTC), pollywog said:
I installed the packages, but when I start Licq, it says it cannot find the
qt
plugin, which is right were Licq says it is not. I ran ldd on the plugin but
it also says the plugin is not there. The plugins have world-readable
31 matches
Mail list logo
