Re: about 64bits time_t transition and deborphan

Hi, Patrice Duroux wrote: > Out of curiosity, I started this transition on some packages from > experimental and I observed that deborphan is not without > «disruption». > [...] > Is this something to be reported to deborphan as it could also be in > some other cases than this

about 64bits time_t transition and deborphan

Hi, Out of curiosity, I started this transition on some packages from experimental and I observed that deborphan is not without «disruption». Indeed, the added suffix t64 to their name means that the updated libraries are listed by deborphan even if they are required by other packages. I suspect

Re: deborphan

> By default it does remove automatically installed packages (but not their > configurations), see the manual page and [1]. So it's quite possible that > it did just that on your system. > > Next time you do an experiment like that, make sure to set up a suitable > control group[2] :-) > > [1]

Re: deborphan

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:06:03PM +, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > Peter Ludikovsky writes: > > > What was the output from aptitude purge? The reason I'm asking is that > > aptitude usually auto-removes packages where the one

Re: deborphan

ust removing , not those packages that were installed along with . Rodolfo > > On 12/01/2016 12:26 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote: >> I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `aptitude install >> ', and along with it a certain number of other packages were >> in

Re: deborphan

What was the output from aptitude purge? The reason I'm asking is that aptitude usually auto-removes packages where the one removed was the only one with dependencies. Regards. /peter On 12/01/2016 12:26 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `aptit

Re: deborphan

Am Donnerstag, 1. Dezember 2016, 11:49:20 CET schrieb Rodolfo Medina: > Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> writes: > > Le primidi 11 frimaire, an CCXXV, Rodolfo Medina a écrit : > Same result: none of them. > > Rodolfo Try aptitude purge `deborphan --guess-all`

Re: deborphan

Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> writes: > Le primidi 11 frimaire, an CCXXV, Rodolfo Medina a écrit : >> I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `aptitude install >> ', and along with it a certain number of other packages were >> installed. Then I did:

Re: deborphan

Le primidi 11 frimaire, an CCXXV, Rodolfo Medina a écrit : > I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `aptitude install > ', and along with it a certain number of other packages were > installed. Then I did: `aptitude purge ' followed by `deborphan' but > in the output o

deborphan

I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `aptitude install ', and along with it a certain number of other packages were installed. Then I did: `aptitude purge ' followed by `deborphan' but in the output of `deborphan' none of those packages that were installed along

Re: [deborphan]

Le 20/11/2011 20:16, zut...@laposte.net a écrit : Bonjour, Je viens de découvrir cette application. Comment savoir si les packages lister sont bien inutile? Salut, je combine en général deborphan et aptitude. Je regarde ce que deborphan me sort comme paquet orphelin et je vais

Re: [deborphan]

giggzounet a écrit : | Le 20/11/2011 20:16, zut...@laposte.net a écrit : | Bonjour, | | Je viens de découvrir cette application. | | Comment savoir si les packages lister sont bien inutile? | | | | Salut, | | je combine en général deborphan et aptitude. Je regarde ce que deborphan

[deborphan]

Bonjour, Je viens de découvrir cette application. Comment savoir si les packages lister sont bien inutile? -- On construit des maisons de fous pour faire croire à ceux qui n'y sont pas enfermés qu'ils ont encore la raison. -+- Michel de Montaigne -+- -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste

Re: [deborphan]

zut...@laposte.net wrote: Comment savoir si les packages lister sont bien inutile? En les supprimant ? =) Si apt veut virer autre chose avec, c'est qu'il est utile. Mais généralement, deborphan ne se trompe jamais. -- Aeris -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http

diff na saída do deborphan

Olá, Desde o feriado, o diff (pacote essencial) está constando da saída do comando deborphan. Não achei nada no google nem nos bugs do deborphan ou do diff. Será que é o caso de um bugreport? abraço, -- Gunther Furtado Curitiba - Paraná - Brasil gunfurt...@gmail.com ...agora, só nos sobrou o

Re: diff na saída do deborphan

: Olá, Desde o feriado, o diff (pacote essencial) está constando da saída do comando deborphan. Não achei nada no google nem nos bugs do deborphan ou do diff. Será que é o caso de um bugreport? abraço, -- Gunther Furtado Curitiba - Paraná - Brasil gunfurt...@gmail.com ...agora, só nos

Re: diff na saída do deborphan

Oi, 2009/9/10 Flavio M Matsumoto fmats...@ufpr.br: Na última atualização notei que foi instalado o pacote novo diffutils. Será que o diff não fora apenas renomeado? Aparentemente, não. Parece que o diffutils provê o diff não o substitui. File comparison utilities The

Re: diff na saída do deborphan

Gunther Furtado gunfurt...@gmail.com writes: Oi, 2009/9/10 Flavio M Matsumoto fmats...@ufpr.br: Na última atualização notei que foi instalado o pacote novo diffutils. Será que o diff não fora apenas renomeado? Aparentemente, não. Parece que o diffutils provê o diff não o substitui. Olhe

deborphan is a wonderful utility

much thanks to whoever suggested deborphan recently to help me clean out unused libraries. i've been fairly conservative with it, getting rid of libs a bit at a time and making sure things still run. someone else locally suggested to just throw caution to the winds and run: # aptitude

Re: deborphan is a wonderful utility

Robert P. J. Day wrote: theoretically, i can see that it shouldn't cause any breakage. but i was curious when i noticed that libhal1 on this etch system is listed as an orphan. coming from a fedora universe, i always thought of the HAL layer as fairly fundamental, but i guess i've

Re: deborphan is a wonderful utility

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Mark Allums wrote: Robert P. J. Day wrote: theoretically, i can see that it shouldn't cause any breakage. but i was curious when i noticed that libhal1 on this etch system is listed as an orphan. coming from a fedora universe, i always thought of the HAL layer

Re: deborphan is a wonderful utility

On Tue,25.Aug.09, 05:00:07, Robert P. J. Day wrote: the minimal part appears to be correct. it's a back-room server, ssh-accessible only, no X. i've been removing things to the point where i'm now down below 450 packages. i'm a big believer in simplicity. You might want to disable

Re: deborphan is a wonderful utility

fslint and cruft are also helpful in keeping a system clean, by finding out duplicate files, broken links, etc. -- () ascii-rubanda kampajno - kontraŭ html-a retpoŝto /\ ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: deborphan is a wonderful utility

Robert P. J. Day wrote: much thanks to whoever suggested deborphan recently to help me clean out unused libraries. i've been fairly conservative with it, getting rid of libs a bit at a time and making sure things still run. p.s. starting with a server that had just over 600 packages, i'm

Re: deborphan is a wonderful utility

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:07:35 -0400 (EDT) Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: ... p.s. starting with a server that had just over 600 packages, i'm now down to 460, with no loss in functionality. hopefully, this will make that final upgrade as safe as possible. Just as a

deborphan 1.7.25

Hola. Para confirmar, antes de ver como reportar un bug, sí lo es. ¿Alguien que use debian Sid y deborphan tiene el siguiente mensaje? deborphan deborphan: The status file is in an improper state. One or more packages are marked as half-installed, half-configured, unpacked, triggers-awaited

Re: Using deborphan

Csányi Pál wrote: Is there an automated way to do this task out there? Try 'orphaner'. sudo orphaner Or sudo orphaner --purge Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Using deborphan

. No need the deborphan. For details check out: aptitude advantages http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/nix/distro/debian/deb10-AptitudeRelated/index.html#_aptitude_advantages What if I'm still using that program? I don't *want* it deleted. Just because it's not being maintained is no reason to delete

Re: Using deborphan

Mumia W.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 08/16/2007 05:45 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote: On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 08:23:12AM +1000, Wei Wang wrote: I recommend you always use Aptitude as your primary package manager. It automatically delete orphaned packages. What if I'm still using that program? I

Using deborphan

Hello! I purge the orphaned packages on a Debian system: sudo deborphan | less and then copy / paste to the aptitude search, and then purge in aptitude. Is there an automated way to do this task out there? man deborphan and man aptitude dont shows any suggestion about that. I try: sudo

Re: Using deborphan

Csányi Pál wrote: Hello! I purge the orphaned packages on a Debian system: sudo deborphan | less and then copy / paste to the aptitude search, and then purge in aptitude. Is there an automated way to do this task out there? man deborphan and man aptitude dont shows any suggestion

Re: Using deborphan

Csányi Pál [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I purge the orphaned packages on a Debian system: sudo deborphan | less and then copy / paste to the aptitude search, and then purge in aptitude. Is there an automated way to do this task out there? man deborphan and man aptitude dont shows any

Re: Using deborphan

Hello, On [Thu, 16.08.2007 08:19], Csányi Pál wrote: I try: sudo deborphan | aptitude purge dpkg --purge `deborphan` executed as root will do the job. Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Using deborphan

On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 08:19 +0200, Csányi Pál wrote: Hello! Hi, I purge the orphaned packages on a Debian system: One line/instruction with debfoster. apt-get autoremove also does some interesting things. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Re: Using deborphan

I purge the orphaned packages on a Debian system: One line/instruction with debfoster. apt-get autoremove also does some interesting things. But not in the Etch with apt version 0.6.. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Using deborphan

I recommend you always use Aptitude as your primary package manager. It automatically delete orphaned packages. Regards On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 08:19 +0200, Csányi Pál wrote: Hello! I purge the orphaned packages on a Debian system: sudo deborphan | less and then copy / paste

Re: Using deborphan

On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 08:23:12AM +1000, Wei Wang wrote: I recommend you always use Aptitude as your primary package manager. It automatically delete orphaned packages. What if I'm still using that program? I don't *want* it deleted. Just because it's not being maintained is no reason to

Re: Using deborphan

On 08/16/2007 05:45 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote: On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 08:23:12AM +1000, Wei Wang wrote: I recommend you always use Aptitude as your primary package manager. It automatically delete orphaned packages. What if I'm still using that program? I don't *want* it deleted. Just because

Re: deborphan

On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:00 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 03.02.07 17:21, Greg Folkert wrote: Funny, I was under the impression Deborphan was deprecated. Aptitude supposedly gives you similar functionality. oh, no. I don't like aptitude and still use dselect, I hope i won't

Re: deborphan

On 03.02.07 17:21, Greg Folkert wrote: Funny, I was under the impression Deborphan was deprecated. Aptitude supposedly gives you similar functionality. oh, no. I don't like aptitude and still use dselect, I hope i won't be pushed into using aptitude ... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL

Re: deborphan

On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:00 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 03.02.07 17:21, Greg Folkert wrote: Funny, I was under the impression Deborphan was deprecated. Aptitude supposedly gives you similar functionality. oh, no. I don't like aptitude and still use dselect, I hope i won't

Re: deborphan

On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:00 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 03.02.07 17:21, Greg Folkert wrote: Funny, I was under the impression Deborphan was deprecated. Aptitude supposedly gives you similar functionality. oh, no. I don't like aptitude and still use dselect, I hope i won't

Re: deborphan

Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 05:01:08PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote: On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:21:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: From: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: deborphan Mail-Followup-To: Roberto C. Sanchez

Re: deborphan

Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 05:01:08PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote: On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:21:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: From: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: deborphan Mail-Followup

deborphan

Hello, my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50. dist: etch. deborphan gives: libgmp3c2 libpisync0 libopal-2.2.0 libident libtextwrap1 liblzo2-2 libmagick9 libc6-i386 libieee1284-3 libosp5 libpt-plugins-v4l libgnome-pilot2 libjaxp1.2-java libnm-glib0 libsigc++-1.2-5c2 libpt-plugins-alsa libldap

Re: deborphan

On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 03:34:10PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote: can I remove merely this packages ? That depends. Do you use any of them? Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: deborphan

On (03/02/07 15:34), Gerard Robin wrote: Hello, my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50. dist: etch. deborphan gives: libgmp3c2 libpisync0 libopal-2.2.0 libident libtextwrap1 liblzo2-2 libmagick9 libc6-i386 libieee1284-3 libosp5 libpt-plugins-v4l libgnome-pilot2 libjaxp1.2-java

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: deborphan

--- Clive Menzies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On (03/02/07 15:34), Gerard Robin wrote: Hello, my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50. dist: etch. deborphan gives: libgmp3c2 libpisync0 libopal-2.2.0 libident libtextwrap1 liblzo2-2 libmagick9 libc6-i386 libieee1284-3

Re: deborphan

On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:21:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: From: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: deborphan Mail-Followup-To: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED], On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 03:34:10PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote: can I

Re: deborphan

Gerard Robin schrieb: On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:21:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: From: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: deborphan Mail-Followup-To: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED], On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 03:34:10PM +0100, Gerard

Re: deborphan

Gerard Robin wrote: Hello, my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50. dist: etch. deborphan gives: and mine gives: liblzo2-2 libttf-dev libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 libdivxdecore0 libsigc++-1.2-5c2 libstdc++5 libgnutls11 libldap-2.3-0 which is funny because I just installed the Sid system from

Re: deborphan

On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 15:34 +0100, Gerard Robin wrote: Hello, my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50. dist: etch. deborphan gives: libgmp3c2 libpisync0 libopal-2.2.0 libident libtextwrap1 liblzo2-2 libmagick9 libc6-i386 libieee1284-3 libosp5 libpt-plugins-v4l libgnome-pilot2

Re: deborphan

deborphan | xargs dpkg --purge On 2/3/07, Gerard Robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50. dist: etch. deborphan gives: libgmp3c2 libpisync0 libopal-2.2.0 libident libtextwrap1 liblzo2-2 libmagick9 libc6-i386 libieee1284-3 libosp5 libpt-plugins-v4l libgnome

Re: deborphan

On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 05:01:08PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote: On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:21:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: From: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: deborphan Mail-Followup-To: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED], On Sat

Re: Reliability of deborphan?

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:07:24 +0100, Rob Bochan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you what's safe to delete. In one instance, the Opera browser has (had?) motif dependencies. However, because Opera is not a Debian package, and doesn't actually fail to install without the libmotif package, deborphan

Re: Reliability of deborphan?

On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:54:55AM +, andy wrote: Hey all I've stumbled across references to deborphan to help maintain my system. I've installed it and read the man so think that I have a reasonable basic knowledge for what it is meant to do, so have run deborphan -zs and have been

Re: Reliability of deborphan?

On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 08:33:15PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote: On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:54:55AM +, andy wrote: Hey all I've stumbled across references to deborphan to help maintain my system. I've installed it and read the man so think that I have a reasonable basic knowledge

Reliability of deborphan?

Hey all I've stumbled across references to deborphan to help maintain my system. I've installed it and read the man so think that I have a reasonable basic knowledge for what it is meant to do, so have run deborphan -zs and have been given a list of files. In theory, I should be able to zap

Re: Reliability of deborphan?

On 12.12.06 11:54, andy wrote: I've stumbled across references to deborphan to help maintain my system. I've installed it and read the man so think that I have a reasonable basic knowledge for what it is meant to do, so have run deborphan -zs and have been given a list of files. In theory

Re: Reliability of deborphan?

On Tuesday 12 December 2006 06:54, andy wrote: Hey all I've stumbled across references to deborphan to help maintain my system. I've installed it and read the man so think that I have a reasonable basic knowledge for what it is meant to do, so have run deborphan -zs and have been given

Re: deborphan

Hallo Marco, Marco Estrada Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas Pakulat schrieb: On 01.07.06 17:18:59, Marco Estrada Martinez wrote: kann ich die ausgegebenen Pakete von deborphan ohne Bedenken entfernen? Wenn du sie nicht brauchst: Ja. Mh, dass habe ich mir gedacht

deborphan

Hi @ all, kann ich die ausgegebenen Pakete von deborphan ohne Bedenken entfernen? Momentane Ausgabe: libtasn1-0 libident libalsaplayer0 xlibosmesa4 libsqldbc7.5.00 libsablot0c102 libldap-2.2-7 freetype2 libpng3 libevent1 libnfsidmap1 libsmpeg0 libsdp2 libdvdnav4 libwxgtk2.6 unixodbc

Re: deborphan

On 01.07.06 17:18:59, Marco Estrada Martinez wrote: kann ich die ausgegebenen Pakete von deborphan ohne Bedenken entfernen? Wenn du sie nicht brauchst: Ja. Andreas -- You'll feel devilish tonight. Toss dynamite caps under a flamenco dancer's heel. -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten

Re: deborphan

Andreas Pakulat schrieb: On 01.07.06 17:18:59, Marco Estrada Martinez wrote: kann ich die ausgegebenen Pakete von deborphan ohne Bedenken entfernen? Wenn du sie nicht brauchst: Ja. Mh, dass habe ich mir gedacht, aber gibt es irgendeine Möglichkeit herauszubekommen ob ich sie

Re: deborphan

On 01.07.06 17:54:42, Marco Estrada Martinez wrote: Andreas Pakulat schrieb: On 01.07.06 17:18:59, Marco Estrada Martinez wrote: kann ich die ausgegebenen Pakete von deborphan ohne Bedenken entfernen? Wenn du sie nicht brauchst: Ja. Mh, dass habe ich mir gedacht, aber gibt es

deborphan defaults?

In my continuing effort to remove unneeded packages from my system I ran deborphan and came up with the following list of orphaned libs: libruby libdvdread3 liba52-0.7.4 libzzip-0-12 libfaad2-0 libhal0 libxosd2 libdirectfb-0.9-20 libstartup-notification0 libsigc++-1.2-5c102 libpostproc0

Re: deborphan defaults?

Marc Shapiro wrote: Can I reasonably assume that it is safe to uninstall these packages? I normally believe in deborphan's output, so I'd say it is. However, if you want to be sure, just check the rdepends. Most probably you'll see some package you installed sometime, but then later removed it.

Re: deborphan

Şöyle söyleyelim: Söylediği kütüphaneleri, sisteminizdeki hiç bir .deb paketi kullanmıyordur. Ancak kaynak koddan paketler derlemişseniz veya un-offical bir arşivden, yeterince dikkatli hazırlanmayan bir .deb paketini kurmuşsanız (kullandığı kütüphane paketlerinin hepsini paket içerisine

deborphan

Selamlar, deborphan'a güvenebilirmiyim acaba ? Söylediği kütüphaneleri hiç bir yazılım kullanmıyordur değil mi? Mehmet Türker http://www.turker.name.tr GIZLILIK NOTUBu e-posta mesaji gizli, hassas bilgi ve/ya da ekler icerebilir. Bu mesaj, mesajin alici kisminda belirtilen

On the use of deborphan (was: Re: woody-sarge failed: out pf disk space)

On 06/12/05 22:43, Tom Allison wrote: A thousand pardons. It found version 10 that was replaced by version 11. I was looking at version 11 being in use, not 10. You're right, I'm wrong. Sorry for the waste in bandwidth. No problems. BTW, here is the command that I use with deborphan: apt-get

[DEBORPHAN] Faire une dépendence fictive...

Bonjour, Je sais que mon titre peux paraitre bizarre... Je cherche un moyen pour ne pas faire apparaire certains packages dans la sortie de la commande deborphan (qui liste les packages qui ne sont pas réclamés par d'autres). En fait, j'ai installé ruby et libruby. Or j'ai besoin de libruby pour

Re: [DEBORPHAN] Faire une dépendence fictive...

Selon yves piel [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | Bonjour, Salut, | Je sais que mon titre peux paraitre bizarre... Aucunement. | Je cherche un moyen pour ne pas faire apparaire certains packages | dans | la sortie de la commande deborphan (qui liste les packages qui ne | sont | pas réclamés par

Re: [DEBORPHAN] Faire une dpendence fictive...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Selon yves piel [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | Bonjour, Salut, | Je sais que mon titre peux paraitre bizarre... Aucunement. | Je cherche un moyen pour ne pas faire apparaire certains packages | dans | la sortie de la commande deborphan (qui liste les packages qui ne | sont

Re: deborphan ile listelenen paketleri kaldirmak (kaldirmali mi?)

* Emre Sevinc [2004-10-03 13:22:52+0300] Birkac gün önce unstable SID'e güncelledigim Debian sistemime synaptic kurdum, kurulurken suggested paketler arasinda deborphan da vardi. Bunu da kurdum. deborphan'i herhangi bir parametre vermeden calistirinca 53 satirlik bir bilgi döndürüyor. Bu

Re: deborphan ile listelenen paketleri kaldirmak (kaldirmali mi?)

* Recai Oktas [2004-10-04 12:23:05+0300] [...] Muhtemel programlama hatalarini goz ardi edersek bu islem guvenli gozukuyor. Deborphan dokumantasyonundan gorebildigim kadariyla programa herhangi bir secenek belirtilmediginde bir paketin oksuz kalip kalmadigini belirlemek icin ontanimli olarak

RE: deborphan ile listelenen paketleri kaldirmak (kaldirmali mi?)

Title: RE: deborphan ile listelenen paketleri kaldirmak (kaldirmali mi?) Detayli bilgi icin cok tesekkür ederim. deborphan'in belirttigin paketlerin cogunu kaldirdim. Herhangi bir sorun cikarsa bildirecegim. Bu arada elle yapmak zorunda kaldim cünkü --force-yes opsiyonunu denememe

deborphan ile listelenen paketleri kaldirmak (kaldirmali mi?)

Title: deborphan ile listelenen paketleri kaldirmak (kaldirmali mi?) Birkac gün önce unstable SID'e güncelledigim Debian sistemime synaptic kurdum, kurulurken suggested paketler arasinda deborphan da vardi. Bunu da kurdum. deborphan'i herhangi bir parametre vermeden calistirinca 53

Re: Deborphan zeigt mir nicht alle ueberfluessigen Pakete!?

suchst. Das analysiert die Du meinst also, debfoster kann mehr als deborphan? Andere Meinungen!? Ich sehe es eher als Ergaenzung zu deborphan. Debfoster's Vorteil sich die Antworten zu merken ist manchmal auch ein Nachteil, wenn man ein Paket mal nicht mehr braucht, aber nicht dran denkt, dass

Re: Deborphan zeigt mir nicht alle ueberfluessigen Pakete!?

Hallo Dirk Salva ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [Deborphan zeigt nicht benötigte -dev-Pakete nicht an] man deborphan -n, --nice-mode --guess-* --guess-dev --guess-all Mit deborphan -a -n --guess-all sollte wirklich alles anhezeigt werden können. Grüße Andreas Janssen -- Andreas

Re: Deborphan zeigt mir nicht alle ueberfluessigen Pakete!?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dirk Salva) wrote: ich habe gerade durch Zufall etwas seltsames festgestellt: aptitude hat im Zuge eines updates auf einem meiner Rechner libssl-dev upgedated. Verwundert hat mich das deshalb, weil -dev doch Dinge sind, die ich als normaler User eigentlich nicht

Re: Deborphan zeigt mir nicht alle ueberfluessigen Pakete!?

Hallo Andreas, [Deborphan zeigt nicht benötigte -dev-Pakete nicht an] man deborphan Da steht hierzu: This method is in no way perfect or even reliable, so beware when using this!. Das hat mich halt erstmal von using this abgehalten. deborphan -a -n --guess-all sollte wirklich alles

Re: Deborphan zeigt mir nicht alle ueberfluessigen Pakete!?

ist auch, dass es ziemlich muehselig ist, die Ausgabe von deborphan bei 10 Paketen noch von Hand in aptitude einzugeben. Gibt es eine Moeglichkeit, dass - nach vorheriger persoenlicher Sichtkontrolle - zu automatisieren?! Wenn mich da jemand anleiten koennte, wie ich das bewerkstellige

Re: Deborphan zeigt mir nicht alle ueberfluessigen Pakete!?

Hallo Andreas, Ich glaube debfoster ist genau das was du suchst. Das analysiert die Du meinst also, debfoster kann mehr als deborphan? Andere Meinungen!? ciao, Dirk Mailantworten bitte an dsalva AT nutrimatic.ping.de Antworten an andere im Header stehende Adressen koennen verlorengehen

Re: Deborphan zeigt mir nicht alle ueberfluessigen Pakete!?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Dirk Salva wrote: Du meinst also, debfoster kann mehr als deborphan? Andere Meinungen!? naja, die beiden Tools haben einen klein wenig Überschneidung im Sinn aber nicht _sehr viel_. debfoster fragt Dich, was Du behalten willst und entfernt den

Deborphan zeigt mir nicht alle ueberfluessigen Pakete!?

ich die (scheinbar ueberfluessigen -dev) alle 'raus und purge sie (nach Sichtkontrolle) einfach (es koennten scheinbar durchaus mehrere sein)? (c) bediene ich deborphan falsch? Ich dachte, der zeigt mir unnuetze Pakete an!? Mit Parameter -aH zeigt er mir dagegen so ziemlich alles

Re: Interaction deborphan/syslinux ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED], le 2 septembre 2003 à 17h50 : [...] je me rend compte que le paquet syslinux ne me sert à rien, # apt-get remove syslinux [...] Je revérifie une dernière fois : # deborphan -a Segmentation fault [...] Quelqu'un a-t-il une idée, une piste que je

Interaction deborphan/syslinux ?

Bonjour à tous, Je viens d'installer un système Debian/testing avec les paquets de base, un noyau 2.4.21 customisé plus quelques utilitaires dont j'ai besoin. Ensuite, j'installe le paquet deborphan pour vérifier les paquets qui ne me servent à rien. Je désinstalle quelques uns de ces paquets

Re: Interaction deborphan/syslinux ?

* Daniel Dupont [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-01 17:50] : Bonjour à tous, [...] je me rend compte que le paquet syslinux ne me sert à rien, # apt-get remove syslinux [...] Je revérifie une dernière fois : # deborphan -a Segmentation fault [...] Quelqu'un a-t-il une idée, une

automatisation de l'execution de deborphan

Bonjour a tous, Je voudrai automatier l'execution de deborphan puis apt-get remove etc... Comment faire pour créer une liste (chaines de caractères séparées par des espaces) a partir de la sortie de la commande deborphan... En fait il suffirait de supprimer les espaces en fin de ligne

Re: automatisation de l'execution de deborphan

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sébastien) wrote: Bonjour a tous, Je voudrai automatier l'execution de deborphan puis apt-get remove etc... Par exemple : deborphan | xargs apt-get -y remove --purge

Re: automatisation de l'execution de deborphan

Selon Sébastien [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bonjour a tous, Je voudrai automatier l'execution de deborphan puis apt-get remove etc... a) Tn toute généralité, je déconseillerai d'automatiser intégralement ... (cron aveugle) Si tu installe une appli A non debianisée qui dépend d'un paquet debian P

Re: automatisation de l'execution de deborphan

Le Jeudi 21 Août 2003 09:43, Georges Mariano a écrit : Selon Sébastien [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bonjour a tous, Je voudrai automatier l'execution de deborphan puis apt-get remove etc... a) Tn toute généralité, je déconseillerai d'automatiser intégralement ... (cron aveugle) Si tu installe

Re: automatisation de l'execution de deborphan

On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:31:46AM +0200, Sébastien wrote: Comment faire pour créer une liste (chaines de caractères séparées par des espaces) a partir de la sortie de la commande deborphan... En fait il suffirait de supprimer les espaces en fin de ligne... Ne pas chercher midi à quatorze

Re: automatisation de l'execution de deborphan

Le Jeudi 21 Août 2003 09:42, Yves Rutschle a écrit : On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:31:46AM +0200, Sébastien wrote: Comment faire pour créer une liste (chaines de caractères séparées par des espaces) a partir de la sortie de la commande deborphan... En fait il suffirait de supprimer les

Re: automatisation de l'execution de deborphan

Le Jeudi 21 Août 2003 09:37, Tuyen DINH a écrit : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sébastien) wrote: Bonjour a tous, Je voudrai automatier l'execution de deborphan puis apt-get remove etc... Par exemple : deborphan | xargs apt-get -y remove --purge ben tout a fait ça... c'est étonant tout

deborphan -a

Salut ! J'ai essayé un 'deborphan -a' sur mon système et j'aimerais savoir sur quels critères il se base pour m'afficher ou pas un package. Merci. -- Manu

Re: deborphan -a

Le vendredi 07 mars 2003 à 18:25, Emmanuel Dubois écrivait : Salut ! Bonsoir, J'ai essayé un 'deborphan -a' sur mon système et j'aimerais savoir sur quels critères il se base pour m'afficher ou pas un package. Il se base sur le fait que le paquet en question nécessite des d'autres paquets

Kuddel-Muddel gelst (Was: Verstndnisproblem mit deborphan)

On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 19:32:24 +0100 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 01:02:19PM +0100, Jörg Schütter wrote: Hallo Adrian, Hallo Joerg, On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 12:27:48 +0100 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: deborphan funktioniert korrekt. deborphan sagt

Verstndnisproblem mit deborphan

Hallo Liste, deborphan (sid) hat mir unter anderem die Pakete libofx0c102 libwmf0.2-2 als unnötig vorgeschlagen. Also ein beherztes apt-get remove libofx0c102 libwmf0.2-2 welches auch ohne Murren durchgeführt wurde. Wenn ich aber jetzt apt-get dist-upgrade -u aufrufe, sagt er mir, dass diese eben

Re: Verständnisproblem mit deborphan

On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:48:17AM +0100, Jörg Schütter wrote: Hallo Liste, Hallo Joerg, deborphan (sid) hat mir unter anderem die Pakete libofx0c102 libwmf0.2-2 als unnötig vorgeschlagen. Also ein beherztes apt-get remove libofx0c102 libwmf0.2-2 welches auch ohne Murren durchgeführt

  1   2   >