Re: df reports wrong partition sizes?

2000-06-05 Thread Ron Farrer
Marc O. Sandlus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Yes, you should change it, but be careful: > All your files in /usr/src actually reside on /dev/sdb5 (yes, the same as > /usr). > /dev/sda7 will be empty! You have wasted 595952 kB till now (maybe you will > find > some old files on /dev/sda7, from a

Re: df reports wrong partition sizes?

2000-06-04 Thread Marc O. Sandlus
Ron Farrer wrote: > Marc O. Sandlus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > It appears from this list, that /usr/src was mounted *before* /usr > > I guess that this causes your problems, since the mount point /usr/src > > didn't > > exist (yet) at the time /dev/sda7 was mounted. > > Quite possible! Here

Re: df reports wrong partition sizes?

2000-06-04 Thread Ron Farrer
Marc O. Sandlus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > It appears from this list, that /usr/src was mounted *before* /usr > I guess that this causes your problems, since the mount point /usr/src didn't > exist (yet) at the time /dev/sda7 was mounted. Quite possible! Here is my fstab: # /etc/fstab: static

Re: df reports wrong partition sizes?

2000-06-04 Thread Marc O. Sandlus
Ron Farrer wrote: > I have two 2GB disks (SCSI-2 narrow) and this is what 'df' reports: > Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/sda8 1189183632032495712 56% / > /dev/sda7 2029267 1694526229834 88% /usr/src > /dev/sdb5

df reports wrong partition sizes?

2000-06-02 Thread Ron Farrer
I have two 2GB disks (SCSI-2 narrow) and this is what 'df' reports: Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda8 1189183632032495712 56% / /dev/sda7 2029267 1694526229834 88% /usr/src /dev/sdb5 2029267 169452