Hi all,
First off, I realize this question has been asked here and elsewhere
before, but I can't seem to find any recent relevant numbers on this.
I am setting up a system with an Intel octo-core Avoton, which has AES-NI
support. After doing some crude benchmarking tests with dd, I am surprised
a
David Fuchs wrote:
> In short, the write speed plummets to around 160 MB/s, as opposed to 270
> MB/s on the naked partition; read speed is at 115 MB/s (slower than writing
> - no idea why), as opposed to 465 MB/s on the bare partition. (I've pasted
> the results below.)
I don't have an immediate a
On 11/16/2014 04:04 PM, David Fuchs wrote:
I am setting up a system with an Intel octo-core Avoton, which has AES-NI
support.
... The drive in question is a Samsung 840 pro SSD,
Which Debian release? Kernel? Motherboard make/ model? CPU model?
RAM module(s) make/ model? SSD exact model?
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014, David Fuchs wrote:
> I am setting up a system with an Intel octo-core Avoton, which has AES-NI
> support. After doing some crude benchmarking tests with dd, I am surprised
> about the huge performance penalty that full-disk encryption apparently has
> on read/write throughput.
On Sun, 2014-11-16 at 18:56 -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> That SSD appears to have hardware encryption. So, why dm-crypt?
So you can copy/backup/move disks and partitions without worrying about
whether you can get access to the result in the future? Because you
don't want to trust or rely on
> Which Debian release? Kernel? Motherboard make/ model? CPU model? RAM
module(s)
> make/ model? SSD exact model? Defaults? Customizations?
My initial post was indeed a little light on details, so here's more info:
I'm dealing with a pristine installation of Wheezy. It is running on a
Supermicro A1
6 matches
Mail list logo