Re: Re (2): docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-26 Thread Lisi
On Monday 25 April 2011 16:25:40 peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: > Definitely a sarcastic example; to accompany my remark > about the computer being a sorcerer's apprentice for > most users. Sorry, Peter - I always did take things too literally. The first French I learnt was "Vous prenez les choses au

Re: docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-26 Thread Lisi
On Monday 25 April 2011 12:01:58 Camaleón wrote: > Oh, well, if you put it that way... there is no need to make a document > for that, just send an e-mail or upload a new twitter ;-) Quite. Another poster in fact suggested email. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debia

Re (2): docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-25 Thread peasthope
Camaleon & Lisi, From: Camaleon Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:01:58 + (UTC) > I took the above just as a sarcastic example... Definitely a sarcastic example; to accompany my remark about the computer being a sorcerer's apprentice for most users. At a social event such as an office party,

Re: Re (3): docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-25 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:19:35 -0800, peasthope wrote: > From: Camaleon > Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:28:01 + (UTC) >> What you are getting is a common/documented error, don't worry. To >> solve it you have to edit the XML file and remove the line at the top >> that links the XML with a stylesheet

Re: docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-25 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:10:10 +0100, Lisi wrote: > On Sunday 24 April 2011 18:34:55 Camaleón wrote: >> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:28:29 +0100, Lisi wrote: >> > On Sunday 24 April 2011 16:38:23 Camaleón wrote: >> >> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:27:33 -0800, peasthope wrote: >> >> > MS invented docx.  Now when

Re (3): docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-24 Thread peasthope
From: Camaleon Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:28:01 + (UTC) > What you are getting is a common/documented error, don't worry. To solve > it you have to edit the XML file and remove the line at the top that > links the XML with a stylesheet (XSL). > > For example: > > > > ... > > Just rem

Re: docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-24 Thread Lisi
On Sunday 24 April 2011 18:34:55 Camaleón wrote: > On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:28:29 +0100, Lisi wrote: > > On Sunday 24 April 2011 16:38:23 Camaleón wrote: > >> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:27:33 -0800, peasthope wrote: > >> > MS invented docx.  Now when John Doe wants to say "Summer Vacation > >> > Planning

Re: Re (2): docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-24 Thread Greg Madden
On Sunday 24 April 2011 09:05:34 am peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: > I get that. But the function of a browser is to interpret > a text in an XML language, into a form for input to a human. > I just don't see how to make Iceweasel recognize the structure > of this document. The style is there but Ic

Re: docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-24 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:28:29 +0100, Lisi wrote: > On Sunday 24 April 2011 16:38:23 Camaleón wrote: >> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:27:33 -0800, peasthope wrote: >> > MS invented docx.  Now when John Doe wants to say "Summer Vacation >> > Planning Meeting.  Bring your coffee mug to the boardroom at 3:00.

Re: docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-24 Thread Lisi
On Sunday 24 April 2011 16:38:23 Camaleón wrote: > On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:27:33 -0800, peasthope wrote: > > MS invented docx.  Now when John Doe wants to say "Summer Vacation > > Planning Meeting.  Bring your coffee mug to the boardroom at 3:00." he > > can send an archive containing a hierarchy of

Re: Re (2): docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-24 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 09:05:34 -0800, peasthope wrote: > From: Camaleon > Subject: Re: docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice >> No, indeed. To avoid that tell (instruct) "Mr. Doe" to deliver a PDF >> document instead and problem solved ;-) > > Or

Re (2): docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-24 Thread peasthope
From: Camaleon Subject:Re: docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice > No, indeed. To avoid that tell (instruct) "Mr. Doe" to deliver a PDF > document instead and problem solved ;-) Or send an email containing a message of about 82 ASCII characters.

Re: docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-24 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:27:33 -0800, peasthope wrote: (Uf... a very old thread, I've completely forgotten the full context :-P) > MS invented docx. Now when John Doe wants to say "Summer Vacation > Planning Meeting. Bring your coffee mug to the boardroom at 3:00." he > can send an archive contai

docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice

2011-04-24 Thread peasthope
MS invented docx. Now when John Doe wants to say "Summer Vacation Planning Meeting. Bring your coffee mug to the boardroom at 3:00." he can send an archive containing a hierarchy of a dozen or so files. Several kB in total. * From: brownh * Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 07:11:47 -0400