Re: domain name: internet vs. intra-net

2001-04-18 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 11:15:03PM -0500, will trillich wrote: > how do you manage the migration? Somewhat painfully... Basically, I've set up the firewall to route between the three internal IP ranges in use and (once I've got the kinks worked out of that) my plan is to, as each user machine nee

Re: domain name: internet vs. intra-net

2001-04-18 Thread Patrick Colbeck
The recommended way to cope with DNS on a LAN using private addressing that is connected to the internet somehow eg via NAT is to use a thing called "splt primary DNS". Basically what you do is this. 1. Have a DNS server on the publically addressed side that lists the stuff that the internet shou

Re: domain name: internet vs. intra-net

2001-04-17 Thread will trillich
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 04:54:48PM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 03:19:40PM -0500, will trillich wrote: > > and can you give an example or two on how to use /etc/bind/* to > > set that up? (all my attempts give dlint conniptions, though > > things seem to work-though-they-w

Re: domain name: internet vs. intra-net

2001-04-17 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 03:19:40PM -0500, will trillich wrote: > and can you give an example or two on how to use /etc/bind/* to > set that up? (all my attempts give dlint conniptions, though > things seem to work-though-they-wobble, with exceptions.) (This had better not be a sly attempt to colle

Re: domain name: internet vs. intra-net

2001-04-17 Thread will trillich
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:24:00AM -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 03:17:00AM -0600, will trillich wrote: > > at the risk of exposing another 'religious' issue-- > > > > let's say you have a static IP 12.34.56.78 and a public domain > > name 'mydomain.org' attached to it. >

Re: domain name: internet vs. intra-net

2001-03-27 Thread will trillich
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:21:56AM -0800, Pann McCuaig wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 03:17, will trillich wrote: > > let's say you have a static IP 12.34.56.78 and a public domain > > name 'mydomain.org' attached to it. > > > > now you add a private internal lan using 192.168.*.* so your > > sp

Re: domain name: internet vs. intra-net

2001-03-26 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 03:17:00AM -0600, will trillich wrote: > at the risk of exposing another 'religious' issue-- > > let's say you have a static IP 12.34.56.78 and a public domain > name 'mydomain.org' attached to it. > > now you add a private internal lan using 192.168.*.* so your > spouse a

Re: domain name: internet vs. intra-net

2001-03-26 Thread Pann McCuaig
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 03:17, will trillich wrote: > at the risk of exposing another 'religious' issue-- > > let's say you have a static IP 12.34.56.78 and a public domain > name 'mydomain.org' attached to it. > > now you add a private internal lan using 192.168.*.* so your > spouse and kids can

Re: domain name: internet vs. intra-net

2001-03-26 Thread Robert Waldner
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 03:17:00 MDT, will trillich writes: >what kind of naming setup do you use for the intRAnet? something >totally different from the public access point ("timmy.my.lan" >for example) or do you branch off the original public name >("timmy.private.mydomain.org" for example)? Well,

domain name: internet vs. intra-net

2001-03-26 Thread will trillich
at the risk of exposing another 'religious' issue-- let's say you have a static IP 12.34.56.78 and a public domain name 'mydomain.org' attached to it. now you add a private internal lan using 192.168.*.* so your spouse and kids can surf for bomb recipes and porn... what kind of naming setup do y