On Thursday 16 October 2003 07:25, Travis Crump wrote:
How much of an idiot do you think the former admin was? It seems
insane that anyone would upgrade libc6 for no good reason.
Hehe, or a complete newbie, who only two weeks after woody was released
realized that he had written testing and
-In response to your message-
--received from Travis Crump--
How much of an idiot do you think the former admin was? It seems insane
that anyone would upgrade libc6 for no good reason. I have a feeling
that downgrading libc6 is going to break something in /usr/local/...
I realized after
Well, for the record, with not getting anyone else's opinion on this, I
finally gave things a try and ran
dpkg -i libc6_2.2.5-11.5_i386.deb libc6-dev_2.2.5-11.5_i386.deb
and the only warning (other than the obvious fact that I was
downgrading packages) was that such a downgrade would
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 20:30, Paul Yeatman wrote:
Well, for the record, with not getting anyone else's opinion on this, I
finally gave things a try and ran
dpkg -i libc6_2.2.5-11.5_i386.deb libc6-dev_2.2.5-11.5_i386.deb
and the only warning (other than the obvious fact that I was
insane
that anyone would upgrade libc6 for no good reason. I have a feeling
that downgrading libc6 is going to break something in /usr/local/...
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi, I've inherited a Debian system that primarily uses the stable
distribution and yet on which the previous manager must have upgraded
libc6, libc6-dev and locales to, likely, the testing distribution as
they are higher versions than available from stable. Now that it is in
my hands, I'd prefer
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 11:27:42 +1100
Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or you could just wait a few days for it to filter into testing.
I thought it already had.
- Richard.
--
Richard Kimber
http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hiya,
im running apt against the testing-source. With the latest upgrade of libc6
the dependencies broke for php4 which I need for my workstation. Ive seen
why and so on and now I wonder if there is any way you can downgrade a package?
I need to go down a level on libc6, and want all the
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 07:59:03AM -0600, Michael J. Denton wrote:
I need to go down a level on libc6, and want all the dependencie-packages
that libc6 brought with it to follow and downgrade to the next level
aswell. Doable? Or is a re-install faster.
I had the same problem - in my case
Hiya,
the SID-version?
Regards,
Niclas
At 16:11 2003-03-17, you wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 07:59:03AM -0600, Michael J. Denton wrote:
I need to go down a level on libc6, and want all the dependencie-packages
that libc6 brought with it to follow and downgrade to the next level
aswell.
Please don't CC me, I obviously read the list, since I answered your
original question :-)
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 05:33:20PM +0100, Niclas S?derlund wrote:
Hiya,
the SID-version?
Sid is Debian Unstable. Search on http://packages.debian.org/ for the
'libc6' package in 'unstable', then
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 02:11:20AM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
Gah, that's horribly extreme. Just install the sid version of php4.
A better question is why either of you let apt remove it to begin with
Because neither one of them has a clue, of course, as to how apt actually
works. Actually
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 23:12:06 +, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:21:28PM +, Pigeon wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:58:18 -0800 (PST), nate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if libc6 is the ONLY thing he installed it may be possible to force
downgrade. one of my
the former
.deb). A conflict with libdb1-compat .
I read in an old forum (August 2001) that downgrading libc6 is not
supported. Is that true?
if libc6 is the ONLY thing he installed it may be possible to force
downgrade. one of my friends installed the unstable of libc6 version
on a potato system about
encountered some problems trying to downgrade (installing the former
.deb). A conflict with libdb1-compat .
I read in an old forum (August 2001) that downgrading libc6 is not
supported. Is that true?
if libc6 is the ONLY thing he installed it may be possible to force
downgrade. one of my
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:21:28PM +, Pigeon wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:58:18 -0800 (PST), nate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if libc6 is the ONLY thing he installed it may be possible to force
downgrade. one of my friends installed the unstable of libc6 version
on a potato system about 8
) that downgrading libc6 is not
supported. Is that true?
Jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(August 2001) that downgrading libc6 is not
supported. Is that true?
if libc6 is the ONLY thing he installed it may be possible to force
downgrade. one of my friends installed the unstable of libc6 version
on a potato system about 8 months ago because he thought he could do
this to run the new mailman
with libdb1-compat .
I read in an old forum (August 2001) that downgrading libc6 is not
supported. Is that true?
if libc6 is the ONLY thing he installed it may be possible to force
downgrade. one of my friends installed the unstable of libc6 version
on a potato system about 8 months ago because he
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:45:56PM +0100, Jerome Lacoste (Frisurf) wrote:
A question for a friend of mine: is it possible to downgrade libc6. he
upgraded libc6 on his stable machine using the unstable's version. He
encountered some problems trying to downgrade (installing the former
.deb). A
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:38:51AM +1030, Tom Cook wrote:
On 0, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would backup any data you really want if possible before attempting
this, technically I don't think its supported, but it is possible at
least in my experience.
I've successfully downgraded a
apt-get install libc6/testing
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Selected version 2.2.5-6 (Debian:3.0/stable, Debian:testing) for libc6
The following packages will be REMOVED:
[omito la retaila de paquetes...]
The following held packages will be changed:
22 matches
Mail list logo
