Re: dpkg and ownership of a file

2004-01-09 Thread Lucas Bergman
That is called trolling. Please don't. But it more appropriately should have been called a badly worded question from a previous staunch supporter of Red Hat before they became what they are today. That's fair enough. I rescind my accusation of trolling... :) Lucas -- Lucas Bergman

Re: dpkg and ownership of a file

2004-01-08 Thread Brad Stockdale
Hello all, I am a newbie to Debian and I made a booboo.. While prepping a system for production use, I accidentally overwrote /usr/include/unix.h with the unix.h that comes from the imap2002e library (used by PHP to enable it to use POP and IMAP protocols)... So, now I cant get some

Re: dpkg and ownership of a file

2004-01-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 01:32:36PM -0500, Brad Stockdale wrote: I am a newbie to Debian and I made a booboo.. While prepping a system for production use, I accidentally overwrote /usr/include/unix.h with the unix.h that comes from the imap2002e library (used by PHP to enable it to use

Re: dpkg and ownership of a file

2004-01-08 Thread Brad Stockdale
Man... Hmmm. If there's not then I really hosed up php somehow. Lol... I'll give it another whirl to see what happens. Thanks for the quick reply!! Brad At 01:47 PM 1/8/2004, you wrote: On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 01:32:36PM -0500, Brad Stockdale wrote: I am a newbie to Debian and I made a

Re: dpkg and ownership of a file

2004-01-08 Thread Lucas Bergman
I am a newbie to Debian and I made a booboo.. While prepping a system for production use, I accidentally overwrote /usr/include/unix.h with the unix.h that comes from the imap2002e library (used by PHP to enable it to use POP and IMAP protocols)... I'm a little bit confused, since neither of

Re: dpkg and ownership of a file

2004-01-08 Thread Michael D Schleif
Brad Stockdale [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004:01:08:13:32:36-0500] scribed: Hello all, I am a newbie to Debian and I made a booboo.. While prepping a system for production use, I accidentally overwrote /usr/include/unix.h with the unix.h that comes from the imap2002e library (used by PHP to

Re: dpkg and ownership of a file

2004-01-08 Thread Brad Stockdale
That is called trolling. Please don't. But it more appropriately should have been called a badly worded question from a previous staunch supporter of Red Hat before they became what they are today. Trolling, AFAIK is a comment used specifically to instigate an altercation of some type. That

Re: dpkg and ownership of a file

2004-01-08 Thread Monique Y. Herman
On 2004-01-08, Brad Stockdale penned: That is called trolling. Please don't. But it more appropriately should have been called a badly worded question from a previous staunch supporter of Red Hat before they became what they are today. Trolling, AFAIK is a comment used specifically to

Re: dpkg and ownership of a file

2004-01-08 Thread Brad Stockdale
Once again, I do apologize for the wrongly worded question... I can see now in retrospect how it could be an annoying question... I'll be more careful in the future. Sorry, Brad -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: dpkg and ownership of a file

2004-01-08 Thread Paul Morgan
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 16:37:32 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote: I think that most of us would much rather see a question phrased as, I would like to do X. How can I do so using Debian [stable|testing|unstable]? than, RedHat did X for me. Why can't Debian? Well, unless it's something