Don Armstrong wrote:
That's basically because the policy wasn't fixed in time for the jessie
release (see #756729 and #771484). If you're using selinux on Debian, it
would probably be good to participate in the development of the default
policy and refpolicy packages.
Yes please
On Wed, 07 Sep 2016, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> setenforce 0 works, there is no need to reboot the whole system. On
> the other hand, I cannot upgrade selinux policy from jessie because
> there is no selinux-policy-default in jessie, although there is in
> testing.
That's basically because the pol
On Wed, 07 Sep 2016 18:24:29 +0200
Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2016-09-07 17:13 +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 07 Sep 2016 15:17:23 +0200
> > Sven Joachim wrote:
> >
> >> File a bug against dpkg. In the meantime, rebooting with the
> >> "selinux=0" kernel parameter should give you
On 2016-09-07 17:13 +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Sep 2016 15:17:23 +0200
> Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> File a bug against dpkg. In the meantime, rebooting with the
>> "selinux=0" kernel parameter should give you a working dpkg.
>
> After rebooting with 'selinux=0' I reinstalled dpkg
On Wed, 07 Sep 2016, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> I have mixed wheezy/jessie system. When tried to upgrade cmake from
> jessie, apt pulled other packages including dpkg which gave error
> during configure:
[...]
> dpkg (subprocess): cannot set security execution context for maintainer
> script: Inva
On Wed, 07 Sep 2016 15:17:23 +0200
Sven Joachim wrote:
> File a bug against dpkg. In the meantime, rebooting with the
> "selinux=0" kernel parameter should give you a working dpkg.
After rebooting with 'selinux=0' I reinstalled dpkg with success:
dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_deb
H
On Wed, 07 Sep 2016 15:17:23 +0200
Sven Joachim wrote:
> This might be a bug in dpkg or in one of the libraries it depends on
> (libselinux1 comes to mind). What are the versions of libselinux1 and
> libpcre3 on your system?
They are both latest jessie versions.
--
http://markorandjelovic.hop
On 2016-09-07 10:16 +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> I have mixed wheezy/jessie system.
This is not really recommended, since your particular combination of
packages might not have been tested by anyone. Having all packages
from the same distribution avoids this source of problems.
> When trie
I have mixed wheezy/jessie system. When tried to upgrade cmake from
jessie, apt pulled other packages including dpkg which gave error
during configure:
root@debian:~# apt-get -t jessie install cmake
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Th
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
My Sid upgraded dpkg from 1.15.8.6->1.15.8.7 and now apt-get
dist-upgrade no longer asks if I want to proceed, but starts the upgrade
immediately.
Anybody else notice this, or is it just me?
One day later: everything normal:
/Tue Dec 28-08:17:13# apt-get dist-u
On Mon 27 Dec 2010 at 10:29:02 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My Sid upgraded dpkg from 1.15.8.6->1.15.8.7 and now apt-get
> dist-upgrade no longer asks if I want to proceed, but starts the upgrade
> immediately.
>
> Anybody else notice this, or is it just me?
apt, dpkg versions as B
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> My Sid upgraded dpkg from 1.15.8.6->1.15.8.7 and now apt-get
> dist-upgrade no longer asks if I want to proceed, but starts the
> upgrade immediately.
>
> Anybody else notice this, or is it just me?
I have:
ii apt0.8.10 Advanced front-end for dpkg
Hi,
My Sid upgraded dpkg from 1.15.8.6->1.15.8.7 and now apt-get
dist-upgrade no longer asks if I want to proceed, but starts the upgrade
immediately.
Anybody else notice this, or is it just me?
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 10:25:39AM -0700, Daniel Farnsworth Teichert wrote:
> > When I looked at the preinst script, it seemed to be choking because
> > /usr/share/doc/libdb2-util wasn't a soft link. I think it may not
> > have even existed. I created a t
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 10:25:39AM -0700, Daniel Farnsworth Teichert wrote:
> When I looked at the preinst script, it seemed to be choking because
> /usr/share/doc/libdb2-util wasn't a soft link. I think it may not
> have even existed. I created a temporary directory, made
> /usr/share/doc/libdb2-u
Daniel Farnsworth Teichert wrote:
>When I looked at the preinst script, it seemed to be choking because
>/usr/share/doc/libdb2-util wasn't a soft link. I think it may not
>have even existed. I created a temporary directory, made
>/usr/share/doc/libdb2-util a soft-link to it, tried it again, and
>
When I looked at the preinst script, it seemed to be choking because
/usr/share/doc/libdb2-util wasn't a soft link. I think it may not
have even existed. I created a temporary directory, made
/usr/share/doc/libdb2-util a soft-link to it, tried it again, and
everything went fine. It deleted the soft
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 01:03:06AM +0100, David Gardi wrote:
> Preparing to replace libdb2-util 2:2.7.7.0-2 (using
> .../libdb2-util_2%3a2.7.7.0-3_i386.deb) ...
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libdb2-util_2%3a2.7.7.0-3_i386.deb (--unpack):
> subprocess pre-installation script
Hi,
I've just done an apt-get upgrade, and this is the error.
Unpacking replacement gkrellmms ...
Preparing to replace libdb2-util 2:2.7.7.0-2 (using
.../libdb2-util_2%3a2.7.7.0-3_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libdb2-util_2%3a2.7.7.0-3_i386.deb (--unpack):
subpro
Subject: dpkg upgrade
Date: Mon, May 07, 2001 at 10:58:35AM +0600
In reply to:V.Suresh
Quoting V.Suresh([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> I often get lots of segfaults when dpkg works - particularly
> when i use apt-get, and apt-get inturn calls dpkg, then dpkg
> segfaul
I often get lots of segfaults when dpkg works - particularly
when i use apt-get, and apt-get inturn calls dpkg, then dpkg
segfaults. Though a reboot sets it right sometimes, I think that is not the
way. My dpkg --version shows 1.6.15 for i386.
I read somewhere that dpkg 1.9 is available. Is it p
21 matches
Mail list logo
