Re: dual boot with Win 2000?

2001-10-04 Thread John
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 05:56:15AM +0800, Rino Mardo wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 08:46:24AM -0700, John wrote: > > I upgraded my son's dual booting box from win98 to win2k expecting the > > upgrade to wipe out lilo on the mbr, but when rebooted, the lilo prompt > > was still there. > > Win2k

Re: dual boot with Win 2000?

2001-10-04 Thread Rino Mardo
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 08:46:24AM -0700, John wrote: > I upgraded my son's dual booting box from win98 to win2k expecting the > upgrade to wipe out lilo on the mbr, but when rebooted, the lilo prompt > was still there. > Win2k not as jealous/possesive of the mbr as win98? > keyword - install, n

Re: dual boot with Win 2000?

2001-10-04 Thread D.
As a point of interest, When I used the same configuration that you have for your Windows partation "other=/dev/hda1" on a HP Pavilion 5450 my Windows Me would not boot up.. It gave the error message that It was missing the command.com file. When I realized what was wrong I changed it to "other=/d

Re: dual boot with Win 2000?

2001-10-04 Thread Sean Morgan
On Wed, 03 Oct 2001 16:40:38 -0500 Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm sitting in front of a W2K-Debian dual-boot system now, and I have a > laptop set up that way also. I don't remember any particular > tricks/problems, other than to install W2K first. I just thought I'd post a working

Re: dual boot with Win 2000?

2001-10-04 Thread John
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 06:32:33PM +0800, Rino Mardo wrote:> > i use debian2.2r0 and the stock lilo. i don't have problems installing > or using lilo or linux with win2k. only thing you have to remember is > install the jealous os first on the first partition, then linux on the > remaining parti

Re: dual boot with Win 2000?

2001-10-04 Thread Rino Mardo
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 10:23:37PM -0400, dman wrote: > I too have set up GRUB to effortlessly dual-boot win2k and linux. I > breifly skimmed some of the other replies and saw suggestions > reminiscent of the docs on linuxdoc.org : do this with lilo, then do > this with the windows loader, then f

Re: dual boot with Win 2000?

2001-10-03 Thread dman
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 03:06:35PM -0700, Dmitriy wrote: | On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 04:02:38PM -0500, Lance Heller wrote: | > X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 | > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org | > Subject: dual boot with Win 2000? | > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: dual boot with Win 2000?

2001-10-03 Thread Dmitriy
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 04:02:38PM -0500, Lance Heller wrote: > X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: dual boot with Win 2000? > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: > > Work requires I use Windblows 2000. Other li

Re: dual boot with Win 2000?

2001-10-03 Thread Kent West
Lance Heller wrote: Subject: dual boot with Win 2000? To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Work requires I use Windblows 2000. Other linux users with whom I work report that while they've successfully built dual

Re: dual boot with Win 2000?

2001-10-03 Thread Sam Varghese
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 04:02:38PM -0500, Lance Heller wrote: > X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: dual boot with Win 2000? > Cc: > > Work requires I use Windblows 2000. Other linux users with whom I > w

Re: dual boot with Win 2000?

2001-10-03 Thread Pete Willemsen
inux.com/howto/mini/Linux+NT-Loader.html Hope this helps. Pete Lance Heller wrote: > > Subject: dual boot with Win 2000? > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Work requires I use Windblows 2000. Other linux users with whom I > work report t

dual boot with Win 2000?

2001-10-03 Thread Lance Heller
--- Begin Message --- Work requires I use Windblows 2000. Other linux users with whom I work report that while they've successfully built dual boot W95/W98 boxen, they've had no success with W2000, apart from a separate boot disk of course. I expect shortly to begin a linux install into virg