On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 05:56:15AM +0800, Rino Mardo wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 08:46:24AM -0700, John wrote:
> > I upgraded my son's dual booting box from win98 to win2k expecting the
> > upgrade to wipe out lilo on the mbr, but when rebooted, the lilo prompt
> > was still there.
> > Win2k
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 08:46:24AM -0700, John wrote:
> I upgraded my son's dual booting box from win98 to win2k expecting the
> upgrade to wipe out lilo on the mbr, but when rebooted, the lilo prompt
> was still there.
> Win2k not as jealous/possesive of the mbr as win98?
>
keyword - install, n
As a point of interest, When I used the same
configuration that you have for your Windows partation
"other=/dev/hda1" on a HP Pavilion 5450 my Windows Me
would not boot up.. It gave the error message that It
was missing the command.com file. When I realized
what was wrong I changed it to "other=/d
On Wed, 03 Oct 2001 16:40:38 -0500
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sitting in front of a W2K-Debian dual-boot system now, and I have a
> laptop set up that way also. I don't remember any particular
> tricks/problems, other than to install W2K first.
I just thought I'd post a working
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 06:32:33PM +0800, Rino Mardo wrote:>
> i use debian2.2r0 and the stock lilo. i don't have problems installing
> or using lilo or linux with win2k. only thing you have to remember is
> install the jealous os first on the first partition, then linux on the
> remaining parti
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 10:23:37PM -0400, dman wrote:
> I too have set up GRUB to effortlessly dual-boot win2k and linux. I
> breifly skimmed some of the other replies and saw suggestions
> reminiscent of the docs on linuxdoc.org : do this with lilo, then do
> this with the windows loader, then f
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 03:06:35PM -0700, Dmitriy wrote:
| On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 04:02:38PM -0500, Lance Heller wrote:
| > X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
| > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
| > Subject: dual boot with Win 2000?
| > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 04:02:38PM -0500, Lance Heller wrote:
> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: dual boot with Win 2000?
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc:
>
> Work requires I use Windblows 2000. Other li
Lance Heller wrote:
Subject:
dual boot with Win 2000?
To:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Work requires I use Windblows 2000. Other linux users with whom I
work report that while they've successfully built dual
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 04:02:38PM -0500, Lance Heller wrote:
> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: dual boot with Win 2000?
> Cc:
>
> Work requires I use Windblows 2000. Other linux users with whom I
> w
inux.com/howto/mini/Linux+NT-Loader.html
Hope this helps.
Pete
Lance Heller wrote:
>
> Subject: dual boot with Win 2000?
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> Work requires I use Windblows 2000. Other linux users with whom I
> work report t
--- Begin Message ---
Work requires I use Windblows 2000. Other linux users with whom I
work report that while they've successfully built dual boot W95/W98
boxen, they've had no success with W2000, apart from a separate boot
disk of course. I expect shortly to begin a linux install into
virg
12 matches
Mail list logo