Re: duplicate package

2023-02-19 Thread John Darrah
On Sat, 2023-02-18 at 16:56 -0800, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 08:50:01AM +0800, winnie hw wrote: > > When I ping from a debian system to a host destination, sometimes I > > get the > > duplicated package. What does this mean? > > I believe you mean "duplicate packet". > > One

Re: duplicate package

2023-02-18 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 08:50:01AM +0800, winnie hw wrote: > When I ping from a debian system to a host destination, sometimes I get the > duplicated package. What does this mean? I believe you mean "duplicate packet". One of the possible causes for that would be having two hosts with the same

duplicate package

2023-02-18 Thread winnie hw
Hello When I ping from a debian system to a host destination, sometimes I get the duplicated package. What does this mean? Thank you. winnie.

Re: Is is legal to have duplicate package names? (We got two)

1999-12-29 Thread Martin Schulze
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: At the moment there are two in the archive. One is xgmod, which is in both contrib and main, with the main one being newer. Looks like the package was moved but not deleted out of old area. Accident probably. The other is ircii, which exists in both main and

Is is legal to have duplicate package names? (We got two)

1999-12-28 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
At the moment there are two in the archive. One is xgmod, which is in both contrib and main, with the main one being newer. Looks like the package was moved but not deleted out of old area. Accident probably. The other is ircii, which exists in both main and non-US/main. Almost the same version

Re: Is is legal to have duplicate package names? (We got two)

1999-12-28 Thread Richard Braakman
On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 04:44:45AM +1100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: At the moment there are two in the archive. One is xgmod, which is in both contrib and main, with the main one being newer. Looks like the package was moved but not deleted out of old area. Accident probably. Indeed.