On Saturday 17 January 2004 03:12, Carl Fink wrote:
[...]
They're both partial knockoffs of WordStar, [...]
One of the things I love about this list is these attacks of
nostalgia...
Wordstar... and giving up 8 floppies for those miniature 5 1/4
ones...
--
richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 2004-01-16, Pigeon penned:
I hate both of 'em. If all I've got is the standard tools, I use ed.
I find it *much* less painful than using vi. Or emacs. Seriously.
What's your preferred choice?
I'm just now reading the chapter comparing editors (A Tale of Five
Editors) in ESR's new book,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
What's your preferred choice?
I use both vim and XEmacs daily. Been using vi/vim for 7+ years and
XEmacs for the last 14 months or so. There was some annoyance for about
four or five weeks as I'd use vi commands in emacs and emacs commands in
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:21:09PM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
On 2004-01-16, Pigeon penned:
I hate both of 'em. If all I've got is the standard tools, I use ed.
I find it *much* less painful than using vi. Or emacs. Seriously.
What's your preferred choice?
My first exposure to a
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:33:18AM +, Pigeon wrote:
My first exposure to a full-screen editor other than vi or emacs was the
Borland Turbo C 1.0 IDE. It wasn't modal, and the cursor keys worked. It
was more or less love at first keystroke. (For those who haven't come
across it: DOS's
5 matches
Mail list logo
