Re: etherchannel bonding problems, Something wicked happened

2001-03-07 Thread Rob Latham
Camm Maguire ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > Greetings! I'll be doing channel bonding here soon on our cluster as > well, and was thinking of packaging ifenslave. I've read somewhere > that on redhat boxes, this tool is not necessary. Is this still the > most 'modern' way of getting this done? In

Re: etherchannel bonding problems, Something wicked happened

2001-03-07 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! I'll be doing channel bonding here soon on our cluster as well, and was thinking of packaging ifenslave. I've read somewhere that on redhat boxes, this tool is not necessary. Is this still the most 'modern' way of getting this done? In any case, I hope to have more information with w

etherchannel bonding problems, Something wicked happened

2001-03-01 Thread Anders Lennartsson
Hi I'm setting up a Debian GNU/Linux based cluster, currently with 4 nodes, each a PPro 200 :( but there may be more/other stuff coming :). Considering the costs, we settled for Netgear 311 ethernet cards, for which there is support in 2.4.x kernels. Patches for 2.2.x, but since 2.4 is here... By