on Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:16:46PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
satan$ dpkg -p exim
(snip)
Description: Exim Mailer
This MTA is rather easier to configure than smail or sendmail.
It is a drop-in replacement for sendmail/mailq/rsmtp.
Advanced features include the
* Karsten M. Self (kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
on Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:16:46PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
satan$ dpkg -p exim
(snip)
Description: Exim Mailer
This MTA is rather easier to configure than smail or sendmail.
It is a drop-in replacement for
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 07:37:29PM -0800, Kurt Lieber wrote:
On Thursday 29 November 2001 07:05 pm, cmasters wrote:
Hope you don't mind the interruption. You may have noticed my slew of
postings about difficulties with sorting mail. I read your reponse to mean
that I may not even require
On Thursday 29 November 2001 10:03 pm, cmasters wrote:
Well now I'm confused yet again. All the documentation that I've read
states that some sort of mail-transport-agent is required in order to
send/receive mail. Sendmail was ornery in setup, so I installed exim (which
in turn removed
cmasters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fetchmail can use procmail as the MDA -- just put:
mda procmail
If your mta is exim then I don't think you need t tell fetchmail
_anything_ about procmail, exim takes care of that. Try scrubbing the
procmail reference in .fetchmailrc
Glyn
--
On Friday 30 November 2001 12:24 am, Glyn Millington wrote:
Fetchmail can use procmail as the MDA -- just put:
mda procmail
If your mta is exim then I don't think you need t tell fetchmail
_anything_ about procmail, exim takes care of that. Try scrubbing the
procmail reference in
satan$ dpkg -p exim
(snip)
Description: Exim Mailer
This MTA is rather easier to configure than smail or sendmail.
It is a drop-in replacement for sendmail/mailq/rsmtp.
Advanced features include the ability to reject connections from
known spam sites, and an extremely efficient queue
On Thursday 29 November 2001 10:41 am, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
exim doesn't have a spam reject file that i can drop IP addresses into.
It doesn't? Then what is host_reject for? Or the ability to use local
rbl-type files?
what exactly are some of these advanced features then?
Did you even
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 11:25:09AM -0800, Kurt Lieber wrote:
* filtering (it would be cruel to liken it to procmail filtering, but it's in
the same general ballpark in that you can reject/drop/delete/forward based on
header information)
That's something I've wondered about for a while...
On Thursday 29 November 2001 11:22 am, Dave Sherohman wrote:
That's something I've wondered about for a while... I've found
exim's .forward filtering to be more than adequate for anything I've
ever wanted to do (and a lot more human-readable to boot), but you
seem to be implying that it's
satan$ dpkg -p exim
(snip)
Description: Exim Mailer
This MTA is rather easier to configure than smail or sendmail.
It is a drop-in replacement for sendmail/mailq/rsmtp.
Advanced features include the ability to reject connections from
known spam sites, and an extremely efficient queue
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 11:42:14AM -0800, Kurt Lieber wrote:
On Thursday 29 November 2001 11:22 am, Dave Sherohman wrote:
That's something I've wondered about for a while... I've found
exim's .forward filtering to be more than adequate for anything I've
ever wanted to do (and a lot more
On Thursday 29 November 2001 07:05 pm, cmasters wrote:
Hope you don't mind the interruption. You may have noticed my slew of
postings about difficulties with sorting mail. I read your reponse to mean
that I may not even require the services of procmail, as I ~am~ using exim
as my MTA. Is this
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 11:05:05PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
...
| Hope you don't mind the interruption. You may have noticed my slew of
| postings about difficulties with sorting mail. I read your reponse to mean
Yes ;-).
| that I may not even require the services of procmail, as I ~am~ using exim
satan$ dpkg -p exim
(snip)
Description: Exim Mailer
This MTA is rather easier to configure than smail or sendmail.
It is a drop-in replacement for sendmail/mailq/rsmtp.
Advanced features include the ability to reject connections from
known spam sites, and an extremely efficient queue
Thus spake cmasters:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 11:42:14AM -0800, Kurt Lieber wrote:
On Thursday 29 November 2001 11:22 am, Dave Sherohman wrote:
That's something I've wondered about for a while... I've found
exim's .forward filtering to be more than adequate for anything I've
ever
16 matches
Mail list logo
