I'm trying to configure exim for a satellite (option #3) and keep getting the
following errors in my logs:
lookup of host mail.mydomain.tld failed in smarthost router.
I can ping this same address, so I assumed that the DNS was working correctly...
I entered the IP address for the mail server
I have a question regarding exim:
running eximconfig I was asked the 'visible mail name', and entered
'solnet.ch' and everything seems to run ok, well, quite:
If I want to test my mail configuration sending a mail to myself, I cant:
mailq
0m 1.3K 18l4sB-D5-00 *** frozen
finalmente consegui enviar e-mail pelo mutt!!!
o problema era no /etc/exim.conf
a linha do script que vem configurada como :
qualify-domain = debian
o correto eh
qualify-domain = provedor.com.br
gostaria de um ajuda para configurar o eximconfig .
qual e a sequencia de configuraçao para quem tem acesso a internet por
linnha telefonica???
desde ja agradeço ajuda
[]s
Marcos
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 06:39:14PM -0300, caio ferreira wrote:
[snip]
Estou utilizando a versao unstable do debian.
Bem-vindo ao mundo da unstable. Você deve consultar o BTS[0] sempre que
encontrar algum problema quando estiver usando unstable para verificar
se outro usuário já se
com ele, e executei o comando
eximconfig, e apareceu as seguintes mensagens de erro :
debian:/home/cosmo# eximconfig
syntax error at /usr/sbin/eximconfig line 955, near )
(Might be a runaway multi-line string starting on line 948)
Execution of /usr/sbin/eximconfig aborted due to compilation
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 02:57:57PM +0100, Martin Rowe wrote:
Setting up exim (3.36-1) ...
syntax error at /usr/sbin/eximconfig line 955, near )
(Might be a runaway multi-line string starting on line 948)
Yes, this looks like a bug to me. Actually it's bug #159213.
A workaround should
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:25:28AM +, Robin Gerard wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 08:04:59PM -0500, ktb wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:24:33AM +0100, Brian Potkin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:12:40PM -0500, ktb wrote:
You can also cheat and put something similar in your
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 08:04:59PM -0500, ktb wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:24:33AM +0100, Brian Potkin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:12:40PM -0500, ktb wrote:
You can also cheat and put something similar in your ~/.muttrc -
my_hdr From: ktb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kent
I
Hello,
I have a problem with the headers of my
messages: ( my user agent = mutt-1.3.17i,my MTA = exim)
If my_login_on_my_machine is toto
my header is :
L1: 14tZ65-Tn-00-H
L2: toto 1000 1000
L3: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
L4: 9888481133 0
L5: -ident toto
L6: -received protocol local
L7: -body
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 07:36:59PM +, Robin Gerard wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with the headers of my
messages: ( my user agent = mutt-1.3.17i,my MTA = exim)
If my_login_on_my_machine is toto
my header is :
L1: 14tZ65-Tn-00-H
L2: toto 1000 1000
L3: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:10:31PM -0500, ktb wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 07:36:59PM +, Robin Gerard wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with the headers of my
messages: ( my user agent = mutt-1.3.17i,my MTA = exim)
If my_login_on_my_machine is toto
my header is :
L3:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 12:54:21AM +, Robin Gerard wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:10:31PM -0500, ktb wrote:
Take a look at the bottom of /etc/exim.conf
the 'rewrite configuration' section.
Put the info for user in -
/etc/email-addresses
Thanks for your reply.
ok I puted
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 12:54:21AM +, Robin Gerard wrote:
ok I puted [EMAIL PROTECTED] in /etc/email-addresses
but the result is identical.
It is amazing that my emails reach their destinations.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] don't exist on my machine and don't exist
on my ISP ?
You can also cheat
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:12:40PM -0500, ktb wrote:
You can also cheat and put something similar in your ~/.muttrc -
my_hdr From: ktb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kent
I would say that the response in your previous email is more
appropriate. That method can be used to rewrite the envelope From
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:24:33AM +0100, Brian Potkin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:12:40PM -0500, ktb wrote:
You can also cheat and put something similar in your ~/.muttrc -
my_hdr From: ktb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kent
I would say that the response in your previous email is more
I'm in the process of setting up exim/fetchmail/procmail/mutt on Debian
2.2. I've used eximconfig option 2, for which outgoing mail is sent via a
smarthost and incoming mail is picked up from one or more POP servers.
Getting incoming mail from POP servers makes sense, since I'm only
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 09:01:18AM -1000, Griffith Feeney wrote:
...
Getting incoming mail from POP servers makes sense, since I'm only
intermittantly connected, but why not have exim send mail directly? What is
gained or saved by going through the smarthost?
I think you are mixing two distinc
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Griffith Feeney wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up exim/fetchmail/procmail/mutt on Debian
2.2. I've used eximconfig option 2, for which outgoing mail is sent via a
smarthost and incoming mail is picked up from one or more POP servers.
Getting incoming mail from
Carel Fellinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) direct delivery:
Depending on your exim configuration outgoing mail is sent directly to your
ISP via SMTP or [...]
To the ISP? Outgoing mail is sent directly to the DNS MX records of
the given host (if the DNS MX lookup succedes).
Griffith Feeney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up exim/fetchmail/procmail/mutt on Debian
2.2. I've used eximconfig option 2, for which outgoing mail is sent via a
smarthost and incoming mail is picked up from one or more POP servers.
Getting incoming mail from POP servers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) writes:
Apart from the other reasons mentioned already, a lot of people reject
mail coming from known dial-up IP addresses, since it's a technique
often used by spammers. Thus using your ISP's smarthost generally
increases the likelihood of your mail being
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 09:54:04PM +0100, Moritz Schulte wrote:
Carel Fellinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) direct delivery:
Depending on your exim configuration outgoing mail is sent directly to
your
ISP via SMTP or [...]
To the ISP? Outgoing mail is sent directly to the
I had to back out of exim 1.90-2 because the eximconfig script
bombed. I don't know why, but when I installed 1.89.1-1, the script
ran perfectly.
This is by leaps and bounds the easiest mail transport agent I have
yet to install. I don't know yet whether it works: I'm encouraged.
Eximon
On Tue, Apr 07, 1998 at 08:19:10PM +1000, Alan Eugene Davis wrote:
I had to back out of exim 1.90-2 because the eximconfig script
bombed. I don't know why, but when I installed 1.89.1-1, the script
ran perfectly.
eximconfig shouldn't run on upgrades, so I'm surprised it tried to run
25 matches
Mail list logo
