On Thursday 28 July 2005 07:41, Anonymous wrote:
> Tom Vier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm the author of wipe, btw (the one at wipe.sf.net). Meta-data
> > journaling alone isn't a problem (except for wiping filenames), but full
> > data journaling is, and some journaled fs (like reiser) don't n
Tom Vier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm the author of wipe, btw (the one at wipe.sf.net). Meta-data journaling
> alone isn't a problem (except for wiping filenames), but full data
> journaling is, and some journaled fs (like reiser) don't necessarily place
> data on the same blocks when you over
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 01:10:43PM +0200, Anonymous wrote:
> I'm thinking of switching from ext3 back to ext2 because the wiping
> utilities (shred, srm) aren't supposed to work on journaled
> filesystems. But I'm also thinking of mounting ext2 synchronously to
> reduce the risk of data loss (power
I'm thinking of switching from ext3 back to ext2 because the wiping
utilities (shred, srm) aren't supposed to work on journaled
filesystems. But I'm also thinking of mounting ext2 synchronously to
reduce the risk of data loss (power cuts, etc).
What will I screw up if I do this?
I notice that t
4 matches
Mail list logo
