Re: ext3 Partition 6GB less than underlying logical volume even after resizing using resize2fs

2007-04-06 Thread Greg Folkert
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 22:54 +0530, Siju George wrote: > Thankyou so much :-) That is good news. > How about JFS's Speed compared to ext3, ReiserFS. XFS etc in your observation? ext3 is fast, but mainly is slower than ReiserFS, JFS and XFS. JFS is very fast. It has some problem when working with

Re: ext3 Partition 6GB less than underlying logical volume even after resizing using resize2fs

2007-04-06 Thread Siju George
On 4/6/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 10:54:28PM +0530, Siju George wrote: > On 4/6/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about JFS's Speed compared to ext3, ReiserFS. XFS etc in your > observation? > I din't try XFS; I forget the sp

Re: ext3 Partition 6GB less than underlying logical volume even after resizing using resize2fs

2007-04-06 Thread Douglas Allan Tutty
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 10:54:28PM +0530, Siju George wrote: > On 4/6/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about JFS's Speed compared to ext3, ReiserFS. XFS etc in your > observation? > I din't try XFS; I forget the specifics but there seem to have been problems. Even on my

Re: ext3 Partition 6GB less than underlying logical volume even after resizing using resize2fs

2007-04-06 Thread Siju George
On 4/6/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 09:58:41PM +0530, Siju George wrote: > On 4/6/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:52:30PM +0530, Siju George wrote: > >> I got a Server Installed with LVM by a third part

Re: ext3 Partition 6GB less than underlying logical volume even after resizing using resize2fs

2007-04-06 Thread Douglas Allan Tutty
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 09:58:41PM +0530, Siju George wrote: > On 4/6/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:52:30PM +0530, Siju George wrote: > >> I got a Server Installed with LVM by a third party. > >> the /var/www is on LV /dev/vg1/www > >> df -h Shows

Re: ext3 Partition 6GB less than underlying logical volume even after resizing using resize2fs

2007-04-06 Thread Siju George
On 4/6/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:52:30PM +0530, Siju George wrote: > Hi, > > I got a Server Installed with LVM by a third party. > > the /var/www is on LV /dev/vg1/www > > df -h Shows /var/www is only 394 GB > whereas lvdisplay shows /dev/vg1/w

Re: ext3 Partition 6GB less than underlying logical volume even after resizing using resize2fs

2007-04-06 Thread Douglas Allan Tutty
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:52:30PM +0530, Siju George wrote: > Hi, > > I got a Server Installed with LVM by a third party. > > the /var/www is on LV /dev/vg1/www > > df -h Shows /var/www is only 394 GB > whereas lvdisplay shows /dev/vg1/www to be 400 GB > I use JFS for everything, running Etc

ext3 Partition 6GB less than underlying logical volume even after resizing using resize2fs

2007-04-06 Thread Siju George
Hi, I got a Server Installed with LVM by a third party. the /var/www is on LV /dev/vg1/www df -h Shows /var/www is only 394 GB whereas lvdisplay shows /dev/vg1/www to be 400 GB == websrv-1:/var/www# df -h Filesystem