On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 12:24:37PM -0400, hawk wrote:
>
> > Thanks to both for my banner-free browsing.
>
> > GAT - Gif Animation Toggle - is another great browsing plus.
>
> Is there one of these for linux, or do you mean as a browser feature?
> so far, the only way I've encountered on linux
> Thanks to both for my banner-free browsing.
> GAT - Gif Animation Toggle - is another great browsing plus.
Is there one of these for linux, or do you mean as a browser feature?
so far, the only way I've encountered on linux is to edit the
executable to change the name of the string that cau
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 10:52:22PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:37:51PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> > If your advertisers want me to look at their ads all they need to do is
> > come up with content that interests me. So far none have.
>
> and present them in a reasona
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:37:51PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> > If we don't look at the ads the advertisers won't pay anyone to put them
> > there and the sites will all go away.
>
> It will no doubt come as a shock to you to learn that there are Web sites
> that do not depend on banner ads for s
Jeff Green writes:
> Of course this is really a very good idea if you don't actually want to
> use the internet.
The Web is not the Net.
> If we don't look at the ads the advertisers won't pay anyone to put them
> there and the sites will all go away.
It will no doubt come as a shock to you to l
On 30-Aug-2000 hawk wrote:
>
> It's also great for dealing with cookies. You can specifiy which
> domains *are* allowed to set cookies.
I don't mind ads, but I resent cookies very much, so I use Junkbuster.
Every once in a while I do find that I have cookies from disallowed sites.
--
Andrew
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 12:33:21PM -0400, Owen G. Emry wrote:
> Also, there's one ad system I haven't figured out how to block: I've seen
> many ads that have URLs "ads.admonitor.net" but nslookup claims this is a
> nonexiststant host/network, so I can't add it to my firewalling rules. Any
>
David dithered,
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 12:33:21PM -0400, Owen G. Emry wrote:
> > Interested in hearing different strategies for blocking ads. Presently I
> > use a mixture of input-chain firewall rules and redirection in my
> > /etc/hosts file.
> > Since I'm running DNS for my LAN, is ther
Of course this is really a very good idea if you don't actually want to
use the internet. If we don't look at the ads the advertisers won't pay
anyone to put them there and the sites will all go away.
Jeff
David Karlin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 12:33:21PM -0400, Owen G. Emry wro
Hi Owen!
Why don't you use junkbuster as filtering proxy? There you'll have a blockfile
that works with regular expressions (ad*.*.* for example):
dpkg -s junkbuster:
Package: junkbuster
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: web
Installed-Size: 284
Maintainer: Paul Haggart <[
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 12:33:21PM -0400, Owen G. Emry wrote:
> Interested in hearing different strategies for blocking ads. Presently I
> use a mixture of input-chain firewall rules and redirection in my
> /etc/hosts file.
>
> Since I'm running DNS for my LAN, is there a way to set it up
Interested in hearing different strategies for blocking ads. Presently I
use a mixture of input-chain firewall rules and redirection in my
/etc/hosts file.
Since I'm running DNS for my LAN, is there a way to set it up to block ads?
Also, there's one ad system I haven't figured out how to bloc
12 matches
Mail list logo
